LITT
Try LITT free
JBE Properties Pte Ltd v Gammon Pte Ltd [2010] SGCA 46
In JBE Properties Pte Ltd v Gammon Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Credit and Security.
Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd and others v Dafni Igal and others [2010] SGCA 45
In Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd and others v Dafni Igal and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Agency, Equity.
Chin Siew Seng v Quah Hun Kok Francis and another appeal [2010] SGCA 44
In Chin Siew Seng v Quah Hun Kok Francis and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of COMPANIES, EVIDENCE.
RecordTV Pte Ltd v MediaCorp TV Singapore Pte Ltd and others [2010] SGCA 43
In RecordTV Pte Ltd v MediaCorp TV Singapore Pte Ltd [2010] SGCA 43, the Court of Appeal ruled that MediaCorp’s threats of copyright infringement against RecordTV’s iDVR service were groundless, affirming that time-shifting technology does not constitute copyright infringement.
Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank AG [2010] SGCA 42
The Court of Appeal allowed the appellant's appeal, ruling that Deutsche Bank's promise of a 48-hour grace period for margin calls constituted a binding variation of the contract. The court held the bank liable for damages for prematurely closing the appellant's FX positions.
JIO Minerals FZC and others v Mineral Enterprises Ltd [2010] SGCA 41
In JIO Minerals FZC and others v Mineral Enterprises Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Conflict of Laws — Natural Forum, Conflict of Laws — Choice of Law.
Public Prosecutor v Rangasamy Subramaniam [2010] SGCA 40
In Public Prosecutor v Rangasamy Subramaniam, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Road Traffic.
George Raymond Zage III and another v Ho Chi Kwong and another [2010] SGCA 4
In George Raymond Zage III and another v Ho Chi Kwong and another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Equity, Trusts.
Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 v Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd [2010] SGCA 39
In Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 v Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Courts and Jurisdiction, Res Judicata.
Abdul Salam bin Musthafa v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGCA 38
In Abdul Salam bin Musthafa v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing.
Ong Pang Siew v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGCA 37
In Ong Pang Siew v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law.
MFM Restaurants Pte Ltd and another v Fish & Co Restaurants Pte Ltd and another appeal [2010] SGCA 36
In MFM Restaurants Pte Ltd and another v Fish & Co Restaurants Pte Ltd and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract, Damages.
Woo Koon Chee v Scandinavian Boiler Service (Asia) Pte Ltd and others [2010] SGCA 35
In Woo Koon Chee v Scandinavian Boiler Service (Asia) Pte Ltd and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Lee Shieh-Peen Clement and another v Ho Chin Nguang and others [2010] SGCA 34
In Lee Shieh-Peen Clement and another v Ho Chin Nguang and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan and others v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGCA 33
In Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP [2010] SGCA 33, the Court of Appeal set aside murder convictions for two appellants, substituting them with robbery with hurt under s 394, while upholding the murder conviction for the third appellant, Bala.
NK v NL [2010] SGCA 32
In NK v NL, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure, Family Law.
Chee Yoh Chuang and Another (as Liquidators of Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Progen Holdings Ltd [2010] SGCA 31
In Chee Yoh Chuang and Another (as Liquidators of Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Progen Holdings Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Insolvency Law — Avoidance of transactions.
Xing Rong Pte Ltd (Formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd) v Visionhealthone Corporation Pte Ltd [2010] SGCA 30
In Xing Rong Pte Ltd (Formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd) v Visionhealthone Corporation Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
CLAAS Medical Centre Pte Ltd (formerly known as Aesthetics Associates Pte Ltd) v Ng Boon Ching [2010] SGCA 3
Case Details * Citation: [2010] SGCA 3 * Case Number: Civil Appeal No 35 of 2009 * Decision Date: 01 February 2010 * Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore * Coram: Chao Hick Tin JA; Andrew Phang
Tay Jui Chuan v Koh Joo Ann (alias Koh Choon Teck) and other appeals [2010] SGCA 29
In Tay Jui Chuan v Koh Joo Ann [2010] SGCA 29, the Court of Appeal upheld the indefeasibility of title under the Land Titles Act. The court dismissed appeals against the registered proprietor, affirmed the removal of a caveat, and rejected unsubstantiated claims of beneficial ownership.
Cheok Doris v Commissioner of Stamp Duties [2010] SGCA 28
In Cheok Doris v Commissioner of Stamp Duties, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Revenue Law — Stamp Duties.
Chee Mu Lin Muriel v Chee Ka Lin Caroline (Chee Ping Chian Alexander and another, interveners) [2010] SGCA 27
In Chee Mu Lin Muriel v Chee Ka Lin Caroline (Chee Ping Chian Alexander and another, interveners), the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Probate and Administration, Succession and Wills.
Lim Eng Hock Peter v Lin Jian Wei and another and another appeal [2010] SGCA 26
In Lim Eng Hock Peter v Lin Jian Wei and another and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Tort — Defamation.
Bachoo Mohan Singh v Public Prosecutor and another matter [2010] SGCA 25
In Bachoo Mohan Singh v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGCA 25, the Court of Appeal set aside the conviction, ruling that lower courts misdirected themselves on section 209 of the Penal Code. The case clarifies the limits of a solicitor's duty of candour regarding client instructions.