LITT
Try LITT free
Tjong Very Sumito and others v Chan Sing En and others [2011] SGCA 40
In Tjong Very Sumito and others v Chan Sing En and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Interim orders.
Sun Jin Engineering Pte Ltd v Hwang Jae Woo [2011] SGCA 4
In Sun Jin Engineering Pte Ltd v Hwang Jae Woo, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Go Dante Yap v Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG [2011] SGCA 39
In Go Dante Yap v Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Banking, Tort.
Tang Hai Liang v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 38
In Tang Hai Liang v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences.
Bian Xiaofan v Changheng (Singapore) Engineering Pte. Ltd & Anor
The Claimant failed to prove the factual basis of his negligence claim, specifically that his co-workers suddenly released their hold on the glass panel without warning, causing his injury.
Asia Pacific Publishing Pte Ltd v Pioneers & Leaders (Publishers) Pte Ltd [2011] SGCA 37
Court of Appeal allows appeal, finding no copyright infringement or passing off. Appellant awarded damages for groundless threats.
Tan Chong Koay and another v Monetary Authority of Singapore [2011] SGCA 36
In Tan Chong Koay and another v Monetary Authority of Singapore, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Financial and Securities Markets — Fund management, Financial and Securities Markets — Regulatory requirements.
Dovechem Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) and others v Ng Joo Soon (alias Nga Ju Soon) [2011] SGCA 35
The court held that the Remuneration Plan did not require the director to retire upon reaching the age of 70, and that he remained a director entitled to inspect company records under s 199 of the Companies Act.
Ng Teck Sim Colin and another v Hat Holdings Pte Ltd and another and another appeal [2011] SGCA 34
The Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the Ngs, dismissing Hat Holdings' claims regarding title defects. The court found the defendants' arguments meritless and motivated by an attempt to force a price discount, affirming that the party best positioned to register title bears the responsibility.
CRW Joint Operation v PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK [2011] SGCA 33
In CRW Joint Operation v PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration.
Muhammad bin Kadar and another v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 32
In Muhammad bin Kadar and another v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing.
Lim Keenly Builders Pte Ltd v Tokio Marine Insurance Singapore Ltd [2011] SGCA 31
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in Lim Keenly Builders v Tokio Marine, ruling that the insurance policy's Operative Clause, read with the 'Name of the Insured' clause, provided the coverage sought. The court rejected restrictive interpretations of endorsements intended only for the LTA.
Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v Hashu Dhalomal Shahdadpuri and another [2011] SGCA 30
In Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v Hashu Dhalomal Shahdadpuri and another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure, Conflict of Laws.
Hsu Ann Mei Amy (personal representative of the estate of Hwang Cheng Tsu Hsu, deceased) v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd [2011] SGCA 3
In Hsu Ann Mei Amy (personal representative of the estate of Hwang Cheng Tsu Hsu, deceased) v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Banking.
Lin Jian Wei and another v Lim Eng Hock Peter [2011] SGCA 29
In Lin Jian Wei and another v Lim Eng Hock Peter, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs.
Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 28
In Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v AFR [2011] SGCA 27
In Public Prosecutor v AFR, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Shadrake Alan v Attorney-General [2011] SGCA 26
In Shadrake Alan v Attorney-General [2011] SGCA 26, the Court of Appeal affirmed the custodial sentence and fine for scandalising contempt. While finding two statements were not contemptuous, the court maintained the original penalty, emphasizing the gravity of the offence.
ZO v ZP and another appeal [2011] SGCA 25
The court affirmed the principles of joint parenting, holding that joint custody should be the norm rather than the exception, and that acrimony alone is insufficient to justify a sole custody order.
Kho Jabing and another v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 24
The Court of Appeal upheld Kho Jabing's murder conviction while setting aside Galing's, substituting it with robbery with hurt. The case clarifies the high evidentiary threshold for establishing common intention under section 34 of the Penal Code in joint enterprise crimes.
Koh Chai Kwang v Teo Ai Ling (by her next friend, Chua Wee Bee) [2011] SGCA 23
In Koh Chai Kwang v Teo Ai Ling (by her next friend, Chua Wee Bee), the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Damages — Measure of damages.
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ), Singapore Branch v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and another and another appeal [2011] SGCA 22
In Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ), Singapore Branch v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and another and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Agency, Banking.
Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) [2011] SGCA 21
In Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore), the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Insolvency law, Arbitration.
Astrata (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Portcullis Escrow Pte Ltd and another and other matters [2011] SGCA 20
The Singapore Court of Appeal ruled that triggering events under an escrow agreement had not occurred, clarifying that US Chapter 11 proceedings do not automatically qualify as 'reconstruction' or 'arrangements for the benefit of creditors' without explicit contractual language.