LITT
Try LITT free
Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 42
In Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Dispute resolution.
Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie v National University of Singapore [2015] SGCA 41
There is no absolute duty on the court to provide written grounds of decision for every interlocutory hearing; the duty to provide reasons is measured against a standard of explanation corresponding to the requirements of the case.
Chan Siew Lee v TYC Investment Pte Ltd and others and another appeal [2015] SGCA 40
In Chan Siew Lee v TYC Investment Pte Ltd and others and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Memorandum and articles of association.
ABU v Comptroller of Income Tax [2015] SGCA 4
In ABU v Comptroller of Income Tax, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Revenue Law — international taxation, Statutory Interpretation — construction of statute.
Kuek Siang Wei and another v Kuek Siew Chew [2015] SGCA 39
In Kuek Siang Wei and another v Kuek Siew Chew, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Deeds and Other Instruments — Deeds, Legal Profession — Conflict of interest.
DBL v DBM
A party challenging an arbitration award for breach of natural justice must show that the breach was connected to the making of the award and caused actual prejudice.
Joo Yong Co (Pte) Ltd and another v Gajentheran Marimuthu (by his mother and next friend Parai a/p Palaniappan) and others [2015] SGCA 38
In Joo Yong Co (Pte) Ltd and another v Gajentheran Marimuthu (by his mother and next friend Parai a/p Palaniappan) and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Tort — Negligence.
Freight Connect (S) Pte Ltd v Paragon Shipping Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 37
In Freight Connect (S) Pte Ltd v Paragon Shipping Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Admiralty and Shipping — Carriage of Goods by Sea, Contract — Remedies.
Mahidon Nichiar bte Mohd Ali and others v Dawood Sultan Kamaldin [2015] SGCA 36
In Mahidon Nichiar bte Mohd Ali and others v Dawood Sultan Kamaldin, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Mistake, Deeds and Other Instruments — Deeds.
The "STX Mumbai" and another matter [2015] SGCA 35
Analysis of [2015] SGCA 35, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2015-07-24.
ANJ v ANK [2015] SGCA 34
In ANJ v ANK, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Matrimonial Assets, Family Law — Maintenance.
Public Prosecutor v Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi [2015] SGCA 33
In Public Prosecutor v Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory Offences.
AHQ v Attorney-General and another appeal [2015] SGCA 32
In AHQ v Attorney-General and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure-Striking out.
Chua Boon Chye v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 31
In Chua Boon Chye v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Evidence — Admissibility of evidence.
PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2015] SGCA 30
The Singapore Court of Appeal in PT Perusahaan Gas Negara v CRW Joint Operation ruled that an interim award enforcing a DAB decision is provisional, not final, and therefore unenforceable under the International Arbitration Act.
Columbia Asia Healthcare Sdn Bhd v Hong Hin Kit Edward and another and another appeal [2015] SGCA 3
In Columbia Asia Healthcare Sdn Bhd v Hong Hin Kit Edward and another and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Breach, Contract — Remedies.
Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC and another v AEL and others [2015] SGCA 29
In Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC and another v AEL and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Tort — negligence, Succession and wills — revocation.
Guy Neale and others v Ku De Ta SG Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 28
In Guy Neale and others v Ku De Ta SG Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Trade Marks and Trade Names — Licensing.
Chiam Heng Hsien (on his own behalf and as partner of Mitre Hotel Proprietors) v Chiam Heng Chow (executor of the estate of Chiam Toh Say, deceased) and others [2015] SGCA 27
In Chiam Heng Hsien v Chiam Heng Chow [2015] SGCA 27, the Court of Appeal ruled that the 1st and 2nd Respondents were not partners of Mitre Hotel Proprietors, as their claims were time-barred. The court affirmed the partnership status of the 3rd and 4th Respondents and clarified partnership share ru
Re BKR [2015] SGCA 26
Analysis of [2015] SGCA 26, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2015-05-19.
Devendran a/l Supramaniam v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 25
In Devendran a/l Supramaniam v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal.
CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd v Asplenium Land Pte Ltd and another and another appeal and another matter [2015] SGCA 24
In CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd v Asplenium Land Pte Ltd and another and another appeal and another matter, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Credit and Security — Performance bonds.
BNS v BNT [2015] SGCA 23
In relocation applications, the welfare of the child is the paramount and overriding consideration, and there is no legal presumption in favour of allowing relocation even if the primary caregiver's desire to relocate is reasonable.
Xia Zhengyan v Geng Changqing [2015] SGCA 22
In Xia Zhengyan v Geng Changqing [2015] SGCA 22, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, upholding contractual claims while dismissing misrepresentation claims. The court ordered the restitution of $1.2 million and the return of shares, emphasizing the need for disciplined legal pleading.