LITT
Try LITT free
Re Harish Salve and another appeal [2018] SGCA 6
Analysis of [2018] SGCA 6, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2018-01-25.
Mui Jia Jun v Public Prosecutor [2018] SGCA 59
In Mui Jia Jun v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Charge.
Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Goel Adesh Kumar and another appeal [2018] SGCA 58
In Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Goel Adesh Kumar and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs, Civil Procedure — Offer to settle.
WRP Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd v Grant Thornton Singapore Pte Ltd
An arbitral tribunal does not breach the rules of natural justice by adopting a chain of reasoning that was not explicitly argued by the parties, provided the reasoning is based on evidence before the tribunal and does not constitute a dramatic departure from the parties' argumen
Mukherjee Amitava v DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd and others [2018] SGCA 57
In Mukherjee Amitava v DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Directors.
NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd v SIA Engineering Co Ltd and another [2018] SGCA 56
In NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd v SIA Engineering Co Ltd and another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure – Offer to settle.
BML v Comptroller of Income Tax [2018] SGCA 53
In BML v Comptroller of Income Tax, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Revenue Law — Income taxation.
Cicada Cube Pte Ltd v National University Hospital (Singapore) Pte Ltd and another appeal [2018] SGCA 52
In Cicada Cube Pte Ltd v National University Hospital (Singapore) Pte Ltd and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Patents and Inventions — Ownership.
Lee Chen Seong Jeremy v Official Assignee [2018] SGCA 51
The Court of Appeal ruled that a company's right of proof in a bankruptcy estate can be extinguished through intentional abandonment. By excluding the debt from accounts and declarations during striking-off, the creditor effectively abandoned the asset, rendering section 346 of the Companies Act ina
Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 [2018] SGCA 50
In Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Tort — Abuse of process, Tort — Malicious falsehood.
Ochroid Trading Ltd and another v Chua Siok Lui (trading as VIE Import & Export) and another [2018] SGCA 5
In Ochroid Trading Ltd and another v Chua Siok Lui (trading as VIE Import & Export) and another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Illegality and public policy, Credit and Security — Money and moneylenders.
TSF v TSE [2018] SGCA 49
In TSF v TSE, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Custody.
Low Heng Leon Andy v Low Kian Beng Lawrence (administrator of the estate of Tan Ah Kng, deceased) [2018] SGCA 48
In Low Heng Leon Andy v Low Kian Beng Lawrence (administrator of the estate of Tan Ah Kng, deceased), the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Damages — Assessment, Equity — Satisfaction.
The Wellness Group Pte Ltd v Paris Investment Pte Ltd and others [2018] SGCA 47
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in The Wellness Group Pte Ltd v Paris Investment Pte Ltd, ruling that specific performance is an appropriate remedy to enforce contractual rights to appoint a director, rejecting arguments that such appointments constitute unenforceable contracts of service.
Thio Syn Kym Wendy and others v Thio Syn Pyn and others and other appeals [2018] SGCA 46
In Thio Syn Kym Wendy and others v Thio Syn Pyn and others and other appeals, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Oppression.
Hamzah bin Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2018] SGCA 45
The Court of Appeal held that applications to adjourn criminal appeals at the eleventh hour will not be granted as a matter of course, and counsel must state precisely the deficiency in their client's understanding to justify such requests.
Muhammad Sutarno bin Nasir v Public Prosecutor [2018] SGCA 43
In Muhammad Sutarno bin Nasir v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Singapore Rifle Association v Singapore Shooting Association [2018] SGCA 42
An occupier does not owe a duty of care to a lawful entrant if the occupier has relinquished control over the premises to a third party during the period in which the alleged negligence occurred.
Adri Anton Kalangie v Public Prosecutor [2018] SGCA 40
In Adri Anton Kalangie v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal law — Statutory offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Audi Construction Pte Ltd v Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd [2018] SGCA 4
In Audi Construction Pte Ltd v Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Dispute resolution, Contract — Waiver.
Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Samsung CT Corp [2018] SGCA 39
Case Details * Citation: [2018] SGCA 39 * Case Number: Civil Appeal No 211 of 2017 * Decision Date: 9 July 2018 * Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore * Coram: Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang
Wibowo Boediono and another v Cristian Priwisata Yacob and another and other appeals [2018] SGCA 38
In Wibowo Boediono and another v Cristian Priwisata Yacob and another and other appeals, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Tort — Misrepresentation, Tort — Negligence.
PRAYUDH MAHAGITSIRI v NESTLE S.A.
The court held that an arbitral tribunal is not required to deal with every argument raised by parties, and silence on a submission does not necessarily imply a failure to consider it. The threshold for natural justice breaches is high and requires clear evidence of a failure to
Rohini d/o Balasubramaniam v HSR International Realtors Pte Ltd [2018] SGCA 37
The Court of Appeal ruled that HSR International Realtors breached its duty of care by failing to implement adequate internal monitoring to prevent salesperson fraud. While the appellant succeeded in her negligence claim, the court found her contributorily negligent, awarding her 30% of her claim.