LITT
Try LITT free
Cheong Woon Weng v Cheong Kok Leong [2016] SGHC 263
In Cheong Woon Weng v Cheong Kok Leong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Land — Interest in land.
Ong Swee Huat v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] SGHC 262
The court dismissed an appeal against a statutory demand, finding that the appellant's continued use of a credit facility after its transfer to the respondent bank established a contractual relationship.
Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan [2016] SGHC 261
In Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs, Civil Procedure — Offer to Settle.
Foo Jee Boo and another v Foo Jhee Tuang and others [2016] SGHC 260
In Foo Jee Boo and another v Foo Jhee Tuang and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Probate and Administration — Personal representatives, Legal profession — Express and implied retainer.
The Enterprise Fund II Ltd v Jong Hee Sen [2016] SGHC 259
In The Enterprise Fund II Ltd v Jong Hee Sen, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Evidence — Admissibility of evidence.
Re Landau, Toby Thomas QC [2016] SGHC 258
In Re Landau, Toby Thomas QC [2016] SGHC 258, the High Court dismissed the application for ad hoc admission, ruling that the applicant failed to prove a sufficient 'need' for foreign counsel. The court held that local counsel were competent to handle the arbitral award setting-aside proceedings.
Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Noor bin Abdullah [2016] SGHC 257
The court exercised its discretion under s 33B(1)(a) of the MDA to impose life imprisonment and caning instead of the death penalty, as the accused's role was limited to transporting, sending, or delivering the drugs.
Trung Nguyen Group Corp v Trung Nguyen International Pte Ltd and others [2016] SGHC 256
In Trung Nguyen Group Corp v Trung Nguyen International Pte Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Stay of Proceedings, Conflict of Laws — Natural Forum.
Asnah and another (trading as Beauty Hair) v Jin Ting [2016] SGHC 255
In Asnah and another (trading as Beauty Hair) v Jin Ting, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (Malaysia) v Ling Lee Soon [2016] SGHC 254
In Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (Malaysia) v Ling Lee Soon, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Insolvency law — Bankruptcy.
Koh Yong Chiah v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGHC 253
In Koh Yong Chiah v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff (administrator of the estates of Shaikah Fitom bte Ghalib bin Omar Al-Bakri and others) and others v Harun bin Syed Hussain Aljunied and others and other suits [2016] SGHC 252
In Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff (administrator of the estates of Shaikah Fitom bte Ghalib bin Omar Al-Bakri and others) and others v Harun bin Syed Hussain Aljunied and others and other suits, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Evidence — Proof of evidence, Landlord and ten
BAF v BAG and others [2016] SGHC 251
In BAF v BAG and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings.
Law Society of Singapore v Leong Pek Gan [2016] SGHC 250
In Law Society of Singapore v Leong Pek Gan, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Disciplinary Proceedings, Legal Profession — Professional Conduct.
BCY v BCZ [2016] SGHC 249
In BCY v BCZ, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Arbitral tribunal, Arbitration — Agreement.
Doka Formwork Pte Ltd v Grandbuild Construction Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 248
In Doka Formwork Pte Ltd v Grandbuild Construction Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Damages.
JFC Builders Pte Ltd v Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd [2016] SGHC 247
The definition of 'construction work' in s 3(1) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act does not import the common law on fixtures; the test is one of fact and degree regarding whether the works form part of the land.
CAA Technologies Pte Ltd v Newcon Builders Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 246
In CAA Technologies Pte Ltd v Newcon Builders Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Building and construction contracts, Building and construction law — Sub-contracts.
Public Prosecutor v Zainudin bin Mohamed and another [2016] SGHC 245
In Public Prosecutor v Zainudin bin Mohamed and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory Offences.
Tan Boon Hai v Tan Kia Kok and another [2016] SGHC 244
In Tan Boon Hai v Tan Kia Kok and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Unincorporated Associations and Trade Unions — Friendly Societies.
Seng Foo Building Construction Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGHC 243
In Seng Foo Building Construction Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Law Society of Singapore v Ravi s/o Madasamy [2016] SGHC 242
The court held that in disciplinary proceedings against solicitors, the paramount considerations are the protection of the public and upholding public confidence in the integrity of the legal profession, which may outweigh personal mitigating circumstances such as a mental condit
Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Firman bin Jumali Chew [2016] SGHC 241
In Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Firman bin Jumali Chew, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences.
Geocon Piling & Engineering Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) v Multistar Holdings Ltd (formerly known as Multi-Con Systems Ltd) and another suit [2016] SGHC 240
The court held that the subcontract between the parties was a lump sum contract subject to variations, not a reimbursement contract, and that the plaintiff's claims were not time-barred as the cause of action accrued upon finalisation of accounts.