LITT
Try LITT free
Asplenium Land Pte Ltd v Lam Chye Shing and others [2019] SGHC 41
In Asplenium Land Pte Ltd v Lam Chye Shing and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Professional privileges.
Chua Whye Woon v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGHC 189
In Chua Whye Woon v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal law — Sentencing.
Liberty Sky Investments Ltd v Goh Seng Heng and another [2019] SGHC 40
In Liberty Sky Investments Ltd v Goh Seng Heng and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Credit and Security – Guarantees and indemnity.
Columbia Asia Healthcare Sdn Bhd and another v Hong Hin Kit Edward and another [2016] SGHC 188
In Columbia Asia Healthcare Sdn Bhd and another v Hong Hin Kit Edward and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Damages — Assessment.
Crescendas Bionics Pte Ltd v Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC 4
In Crescendas Bionics Pte Ltd v Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms, Contract — Formation.
Public Prosecutor v Chin Swee Chung [2016] SGHC 187
In Public Prosecutor v Chin Swee Chung, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal law — Offences.
Liberty Sky Investments Ltd v Goh Seng Heng and another [2019] SGHC 39
In Liberty Sky Investments Ltd v Goh Seng Heng and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Misrepresentation, Equity — Remedies.
L Manimuthu and others v L Shanmuganathan [2016] SGHC 186
In L Manimuthu and others v L Shanmuganathan, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Consideration, Contract — Illegality.
Jian Li Investments Holding Pte Ltd and others v Healthstats International Pte Ltd and others [2019] SGHC 38
In Jian Li Investments Holding Pte Ltd and others v Healthstats International Pte Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Oppression.
Soon Ah See and another v Diao Yanmei [2016] SGHC 185
In Soon Ah See v Diao Yanmei [2016] SGHC 185, the Court ruled that a marriage of convenience does not trigger the automatic revocation of a CPF nomination under the CPF Act. The Court upheld the nomination in favor of the plaintiffs, confirming that statutory protections apply only to genuine unions
Public Prosecutor v BUT [2019] SGHC 37
In Public Prosecutor v BUT, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Lam Kwok Leong and another v Yap Koe Siong [2016] SGHC 184
In Lam Kwok Leong and another v Yap Koe Siong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Credit and security — Money and moneylenders.
THE "MIN RUI" [2016] SGHC 183
In The Min Rui [2016] SGHC 183, the High Court ruled that beneficial ownership of a vessel passes to the buyer upon completion of delivery formalities. The court set aside the vessel's arrest, confirming that the Protocol of Delivery and Acceptance marks the shift of proprietary interests.
Qroi Ltd v Pascoe, Ian and another [2019] SGHC 36
The court held that a claim should not be struck out if there are genuine issues of fact and law that require trial, even if the claim appears weak.
Oro Negro Drilling Pte Ltd and others v Integradora de Servicios Petroleros Oro Negro, SAPI de CV and others [2019] SGHC 35
In Oro Negro Drilling Pte Ltd and others v Integradora de Servicios Petroleros Oro Negro, SAPI de CV and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Injunctions, Civil Procedure — Appeals.
Public Prosecutor v Ong Jack Hong [2016] SGHC 182
In Public Prosecutor v Ong Jack Hong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences.
Ozak Seiko Co Ltd v Ozak Seiko (S) Pte Ltd and another and other matters [2019] SGHC 34
The Singapore High Court dismissed an application for a derivative action under s 216A of the Companies Act, ruling that the applicant failed to meet notice requirements, lacked good faith due to unexplained delays, and failed to prove the litigation was in the company's best interests.
Sumoi Paramesvaeri v Fleury, Jeffrey Gerard and another [2016] SGHC 181
In Sumoi Paramesvaeri v Fleury, Jeffrey Gerard and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Equity — Defences, Equity — Estoppel.
Public Prosecutor v Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa and another [2019] SGHC 33
In Public Prosecutor v Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa [2019] SGHC 33, the High Court acquitted the second accused of joint possession and trafficking, ruling the Prosecution failed to prove common intention. The charge was amended to abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act due to insufficient evidence.
Public Prosecutor v Chow Chian Yow Joseph Brian [2016] SGHC 18
In Public Prosecutor v Chow Chian Yow Joseph Brian [2016] SGHC 18, the High Court allowed the prosecution's appeal, replacing a $4,500 fine with a 1.5-month custodial sentence, establishing a key sentencing framework for Enlistment Act defaulters based on default duration and mitigating factors.
Lim Poh Yeoh (alias Lim Aster) v TS Ong Construction Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 179
A statutory demand founded on an adjudication determination under the SOPA can be set aside if the debtor has a genuine cross-demand that raises triable issues, as the SOPA's 'pay first, argue later' policy does not override the insolvency regime's rules on cross-claims.
SULZER PUMPS SPAIN, S. A. v HYFLUX MEMBRANE MANUFACTURING (S) PTE LTD & Anor
The court held that a strong prima facie case of unconscionability is required to restrain a call on an unconditional first demand bond, and that a genuine dispute between parties does not constitute unconscionability.
Public Prosecutor v Suventher Shanmugam [2016] SGHC 178
In Public Prosecutor v Suventher Shanmugam, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences.
Lim Seng Wah and another v Han Meng Siew and others [2016] SGHC 177
The judgment in Lim Seng Wah and another v Han Meng Siew and others [2016] SGHC 177 serves as a definitive exploration of the procedural and substantive boundaries of minority shareholder oppression under section 216 of the Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed). The dispute centere