LITT
Try LITT free
The Management Corporation Strata Plan No. 3602 v DECLAN PEARSE MACFADDEN
circumstances, the STB held that there was no inordinate delay on the part of the MCST in establishing the cause of the leak and in repairing the pipe.3 5 The STB, however, held that it mattered not that the MCST could not have known of the existence of the pipe4 – if it did not maintain a pipe th
KRISTIN ANNUS v JEKATERINA ANNUS & 2 Ors
HELD OVER UNTIL THE DETERMINATION OF THE ESTONIAN PROCEEDINGS..................................................................................................7 Version No 1: 25 Apr 2023 (08:22 hrs) This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction purs
Chantell Glenville v Quek Swee Chong & Anor
(“SUM 4004”). I held that by virtue of O 3 r 3 of the Rules of Court (2014 Rev Ed) (“ROC”), the Writ of Summons had not expired when served on the following Monday. As there does not appear to be any local decision on this point, I set out my reasons below. Version No 1: 26 Oct 2021 (12:03 hrs) G
SOEMARTO SULISTIO V STUKAN YETTY FANG & 4 ORS
Singapore as an investment. At the date of purchase, they were held under 6 UOB Gold Certificates (“the Original Gold Certificates”) bearing the serial numbers 00272, 00273, 00274, 00275, 00276 and 00277 and dated 11 February 2 Certified Transcript (29.09.2020) at p 8, lines 11 – 17. Version No
PARVATY D/O RAJU & Anor v NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (S) PTE LTD & Anor
on 18 May 2023 at p 2. Version No 1: 12 Jan 2026 (17:18 hrs) Parvaty d/o Raju v National University Hospital (S) Pte Ltd [2026] SGHC 7 6 claimant. In the interests of accuracy, however, I will refer only to the “Claimant” in these grounds of decision, on the understanding that this refers to Mdm
TAY QUAN LI, LEON
place from 24 November to 3 December 2020, were held remotely. The SILE which administers the Part B Exams, subsequently determined that at least 11 students who sat for the 2020 Part B Exams had cheated. Those students re-took and passed the Part B Exams in 2021 and then applied to be admitted t
The "Emma Maersk"
a valid certificate of competency as master of a foreign-going ship issued by the Government of India. 22 The ship arrived in Singapore on 17 April 2002. Prior to her arrival in port, the gangways, both port and starboard sides, and the pilot ladders were rigged and in place, checked and were ready
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Kishor Kumar A/L Raguan & Anor
SUMMARY ON DEFENCE OF KNOWLEDGE.......................................................66 POSSESSION OF THE DRUGS FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRAFFICKING....................66 CONCLUSION ON THE CHARGE AGAINST PUNG..............................................67 SENTENCE .......................................
The "An Ji Jiang"
ong) for the plaintiffs; Toh Kian Sing with Chia Song Yeow (Rajah & Tann) for the defendants Parties : — Admiralty and Shipping – Carriage of goods by sea – Voyage charterparties – Terms of charterparty – Whether terms of Asbatankvoy charterparty incorporated into parties' charterparty by agreement
HAJIME SHINJI
lution Act 2018 And In the matter of the Third Schedule of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 And In the matter of Rams Challenge Shipping Pte Ltd Hajime Shinji … Claimant Originating Application No 251 of 2022 In the matter of Ocean (Semi-Open) Pte Ltd Hajime Shinji … Claima
NALLI KUPPUSWAMI CHETTI and NALLI RAMANATHAN & Anor v NALLI PTE LTD & 2 Ors
hetty (2) Nalli Chinnasami Chetty Pte Ltd … Plaintiffs And (1) Nalli Pte Ltd (2) Dasarathan Madhavan (3) Alluri Mahalakshmi Madhavan … Defendants JUDGMENT [Contract — Contractual terms — Express terms — Interpretation of deeds of settlement] [Limitation of Actions — Particular causes of
The "Cherry" and others
that a party suing on a bill of lading as holder must be in possession of the bill at the time of the commencement of the action. The decision was of little assistance to the defendants’ contention because the questions whether possession for that purpose means physical possession and whether posses
AHMAD KASIM BIN ADAM (suing as Administrator of the Estate of Adam Bin Haji Anwar, deceased) v SINGAPORE LAND AUTHORITY & 2 Ors
) … Applicant And (1) Singapore Land Authority (2) Collector of Land Revenue (3) Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore … Respondents JUDGMENT [Administrative Law] — [Judicial review] — [Leave to commence judicial review] — [Limitation period] [Administrative Law] — [Natural justice] [A
ANG XING YAO, LIONEL & Anor v LEW MUN HUNG, JOSEPH & 2 Ors
in RDR to Ang for $1. This share transfer was registered with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (“ACRA”) on or around 25 February 2018.16 12 In early April 2018, Ang and Lew discussed the prospect of Yu investing in RDR. Ang arranged for Yu and Yu’s fiancée to meet Lew at RDR’s o
The "Aquarius III"
its hands with a view to enabling the owners to settle claims. 43. Secondly, although Colin Ng & Partners were aware of the proposed advertisement on 4 January 2002, they did nothing until mid-January 2002 to ascertain whether the advertisement had in fact been published. 44. Thirdly, Gulf Agency ha
KEPPEL FELS LIMITED v Owner of the vessel(s) SONGA VENUS (IMO No. 8755613)
at 240, that: The ship is liable for wages and costs. The costs are as much due as the sors principalis. 13 Although The Margaret did not involve competing claimants with claims of different priorities, it was cited and followed by the Federal Court of Australia in Patrick Stevedores No 2 Pty Lt
RIDA GLOBAL PTE. LTD. v JONATHAN LIM CHUAN REN
in that case that the saving of costs in keeping the ECT proceedings distinct from the High Court proceedings would have been “overwhelming” because the claim there was made against 12 defendants, and thus, allowing the transfer for the defendant would mean that 11 other defendants would have to
WEE LAI SOON & Anor v ONG JIAN MIN (WANG JIANMIN)
g Jian Min … Defendant JUDGMENT [Damages — Measure of damages — Personal injuries cases] [Damages — Assessment] Version No 1: 11 May 2022 (11:50 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 1 BACKGROUN
3N INVESTMENTS GROUP LIMITED & Anor v LIM BOON CHYE VICTOR & 2 Ors
(and continue to hold, in the cases of Mr Lim and Mr Srinivasan) shares in ROS through companies incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”). Mr Chia’s company, 3N Investments Group Limited (“3N”) (of which Mr Chia is the sole shareholder and director) is the first plaintiff. 3 Through t
KUOH HAO TENG
161) And In the Matter of Rule 25 of the Legal Profession (Admission) Rules 2011 Re Kuoh Hao Teng GROUNDS OF DECISION [Legal Profession] — [Admission] Version No 1: 09 Apr 2021 (12:31 hrs) This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the
PAKIRISAMY RAJOO & Anor v SHEILA DEVI D/O PAKIRISAMY RAJOO
nd Sheila Devi d/o Pakirisamy Rajoo … Defendant GROUNDS OF DECISION [Civil Procedure — Setting aside — Dismissal of claim — Absence of plaintiff at trial] [Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Duties and responsibilities] Version No 1: 09 Nov 2022 (14:52 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..
SHEIKH PARVEZ ZUNUAS BIN SHAIK RAHEEM v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
a genuine mistaken belief was rejected as it was neither innocent nor based on reasonable Version No 2: 16 Jun 2022 (10:35 hrs) Sheik Parvez Zunuas bin Shaik Raheem v PP [2022] SGHC 138 7 grounds. Instead, it was a contrived effort on the part of the appellant to avoid the consequences of his act
The "Arktis Fighter"
ng SC and Chan Leng Sun (Ang & Partners) for the plaintiffs; Navinder Singh (Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo) for the defendants Parties : — Admiralty and Shipping – Admiralty jurisdiction and arrest – Arrest of vessel – Whether ex parte application for inspection of vessel and discovery appropriate
ATTORNEY-GENERAL v RAVI S/O MADASAMY & Anor
ociety of Singapore … Defendants GROUNDS OF DECISION [Legal Profession — Disciplinary proceedings — Application for review of Disciplinary Tribunal’s decision] [Legal Profession — Disciplinary proceedings — Whether review application brought out of time] Version No 1: 28 Jul 2022 (11:56 hrs) i TAB