LITT
Try LITT free
CNA v CNB & Anor
In CNA v CNB & Anor, the international_commercial_court addressed issues of .
APBA Pte Ltd v Seah Shiang Ping and others [2019] SGHC 229
The High Court dismissed an application under s 182 of the Companies Act to convene an inquorate EGM to remove directors. The Court ruled that s 182 cannot override substantive rights to participate in management and that derivative actions under s 216A are the proper remedy for breach of duty.
Seah Chee Wan and another v Connectus Group Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC 228
In Seah Chee Wan and another v Connectus Group Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Winding up.
Vanbo Investments Pte Ltd v ph. AG & Anor
In Vanbo Investments Pte Ltd v ph. AG & Anor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Public Prosecutor v BMF [2019] SGHC 227
In Public Prosecutor v BMF, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v Parthiban Kanapathy [2019] SGHC 226
In Public Prosecutor v Parthiban Kanapathy, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Statements, Criminal Law — Statutory offences.
Re: ALSEN CHANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Analysis of [2026] SGHC 61, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2026-03-19.
Re Salwant Singh s/o Amer Singh [2019] SGHC 225
The court held that a prima facie case for an investigation into alleged misconduct by Legal Service Officers was not established, and that in any event, the inordinate delay in bringing the complaint militated against the exercise of the court's discretion to grant leave.
Tay Wee Kiat and another v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2019] SGHC 224
In Tay Wee Kiat and another v Public Prosecutor and another appeal, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Kay Swee Pin v Ng Kong Yeam [2019] SGHC 223
In Kay Swee Pin v Ng Kong Yeam, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Restitution — Unjust enrichment.
Anita Hatta v Lee Siow Kiang Georgia and others [2019] SGHC 222
In Anita Hatta v Lee Siow Kiang Georgia and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Misrepresentation, Companies — Oppression.
Ye Lin Myint v Public Prosecutor [2019] SGHC 221
In Ye Lin Myint v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
ARFAT PANNIR SELVAM & 2 Ors v SHARAD SELVAM RAMACHANDRA
In ARFAT PANNIR SELVAM & 2 Ors v SHARAD SELVAM RAMACHANDRA, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Cheng Tim Jin v Alvamar Capital Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC 220
In Cheng Tim Jin v Alvamar Capital Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Directors.
Xiamen Tonghin Furniture Industries Co Pte Ltd v Goh Heng Tee
The court held that the Defendant had actual notice of the Second Xiamen Proceedings, thereby refuting the allegation of breach of natural justice. The court also clarified the application of the Ladd v Marshall requirements for adducing fresh evidence on appeal.
Ng Kong Yeam (suing by Ling Towi Sing (alias Ling Chooi Seng) and others) v Kay Swee Pin and another [2019] SGHC 219
In Ng Kong Yeam (suing by Ling Towi Sing (alias Ling Chooi Seng) and others) v Kay Swee Pin and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Evidence – Admissibility of evidence, Gifts – Presumptions against.
Bijynath s/o Ram Nawal v Innovationz Pte Ltd (Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority, intervener) [2019] SGHC 218
The court has broad discretion under s 344G(3) of the Companies Act to place persons in the position they would have been in had a company not been struck off, provided it is just to do so, and this discretion is not limited by the test for leave under s 155A(3).
Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman v Attorney-General [2019] SGHC 217
In Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman v Attorney-General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial review, Civil Procedure — Discovery of documents.
ABDULLAH BIN MOHAMMAD KUNHI v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
In ABDULLAH BIN MOHAMMAD KUNHI v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Heince Tombak Simanjuntak and others v Paulus Tannos and others [2019] SGHC 216
In Heince Tombak Simanjuntak and others v Paulus Tannos and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Conflict of Laws — Foreign judgments.
Public Prosecutor v Khoo Kwee Hock Leslie [2019] SGHC 215
In Public Prosecutor v Khoo Kwee Hock Leslie, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences, Criminal Law — Special exceptions.
GREEN GLOBAL TRADING LIMITED v ATTORNEY-GENERAL
The High Court dismissed Green Global Trading Limited's application to challenge a French Confiscation Order, ruling that the applicant failed to prove grounds for cancellation under the MACMA and should have exhausted legal remedies in the French courts instead of seeking a collateral review.
Philip Antony Jeyaretnam and another v Kulandaivelu Malayaperumal and others (Thirumurthy Ayernaar Pamabayan, third party; Pramela d/o Govindasamy and another, non-parties) [2019] SGHC 214
In Philip Antony Jeyaretnam and another v Kulandaivelu Malayaperumal and others (Thirumurthy Ayernaar Pamabayan, third party; Pramela d/o Govindasamy and another, non-parties), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Trusts — Constructive trusts, Equity — Equitable lien.
Tan Hai Peng Micheal and another (as the executors of the estate of Tan Thuan Teck, deceased) v Tan Cheong Joo and another and other matters
The court held that solicitors have a non-delegable duty to verify the authenticity and accuracy of all legal authorities cited in court submissions, and that the citation of fictitious authorities, even if unintentional, warrants personal costs orders against the solicitors resp