LITT
Try LITT free
Public Prosecutor v Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh and another [2016] SGHC 217
In Public Prosecutor v Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences.
Joseph Ramanathan v Stratech Systems Ltd [2016] SGHC 216
In Joseph Ramanathan v Stratech Systems Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Employment Law — Pay.
Chng Leng Khim v Public Prosecutor and another matter [2016] SGHC 215
The High Court set aside a conviction after finding the appellant's guilty plea was induced by undue pressure from counsel regarding a potential psychiatric remand. The case clarifies that pleas must be entered voluntarily, free from alarmist advice that deprives an accused of their freedom of choic
Calvin Klein, Inc and another v HS International Pte Ltd and others [2016] SGHC 214
In an application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement, the court must determine if there is a prima facie case of infringement and if the defendant has a real or bona fide defence. Innocent infringement is not a defence in civil trade mark infringement actions.
Public Prosecutor v Pram Nair [2016] SGHC 213
In Public Prosecutor v Pram Nair, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal procedure and sentencing — Sentencing.
JX Holdings Inc and another v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2016] SGHC 212
In JX Holdings Inc and another v Singapore Airlines Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Shares, Conflict of Laws — Choice of law.
BDG v BDH [2016] SGHC 211
In BDG v BDH, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Winding up.
Pacific Andes Resources Development Ltd and other matters [2016] SGHC 210
Analysis of [2016] SGHC 210, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2016-09-27.
Sim Yeow Kee v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2016] SGHC 209
In Sim Yeow Kee v Public Prosecutor and another appeal, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
One Investment and Consultancy Limited and another v Cham Poh Meng (DBS Bank Ltd, garnishee) [2016] SGHC 208
In One Investment and Consultancy Limited and another v Cham Poh Meng (DBS Bank Ltd, garnishee), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Banking — Garnishee orders.
Lee Wei Ling and another v Attorney-General [2016] SGHC 207
The High Court dismissed the application, ruling that while the LKY estate holds the copyright to the Transcripts, its rights are limited by the Interview Agreement. The court held that the estate cannot grant access or use the materials, as those rights were personal to the late Lee Kuan Yew.
Tan Swee Wan and another v Lian Tian Yong Johnny [2016] SGHC 206
The court held that paragraph 26(d) of the Statement of Claim should be struck out as it was not relevant to the issue of the Defendant's state of mind and would unduly delay the trial.
Higgins, Danial Patrick v Mulacek, Philippe Emanuel and others and another suit [2016] SGHC 205
In Higgins, Danial Patrick v Mulacek, Philippe Emanuel and others and another suit, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms, Companies — Directors.
Jaya Sudhir a/l Jayaram v Tong Seak Kan and another [2016] SGHC 204
In Jaya Sudhir a/l Jayaram v Tong Seak Kan and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Pleadings.
Max-Sun Trading Ltd and another v Tang Mun Kit and another (Tan Siew Moi, third party) [2016] SGHC 203
In Max-Sun Trading Ltd and another v Tang Mun Kit and another (Tan Siew Moi, third party), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Formation, Equity — Fiduciary relationships.
BDC v BDD and another [2016] SGHC 202
In BDC v BDD and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings.
Addy Amin bin Mohamed v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGHC 201
In Addy Amin bin Mohamed v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Revision of proceedings.
SKP Pradiksi (North) Sdn Bhd and another v Trisuryo Garuda Nusa Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 200
The High Court dismissed a stay of proceedings application, ruling that Indonesia was not an appropriate forum under forum non conveniens because the local legal system would not recognize the plaintiffs' trust claim, effectively denying them access to justice.
Chia Hang Kiu (administratrix of the estate of Chia Chee Wah (alias Chay Ah Soo) deceased) v Chia Kwok Yeo and others and another suit [2016] SGHC 198
In Chia Hang Kiu (administratrix of the estate of Chia Chee Wah (alias Chay Ah Soo) deceased) v Chia Kwok Yeo and others and another suit, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Probate and administration — Administration of assets, Trusts — Constructive trusts.
George Sapooran Singh v Gordip d/o MD Garsingh [2016] SGHC 197
In George Sapooran Singh v Gordip d/o MD Garsingh, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Maintenance.
ATS v ATT [2016] SGHC 196
In ATS v ATT, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Maintenance, Family law — Child.
Re Taisoo Suk (as foreign representative of Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd) [2016] SGHC 195
Analysis of [2016] SGHC 195, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2016-09-14.
Karthigeyan M Kailasam v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGHC 193
In Karthigeyan M Kailasam v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Leow Kwee Huay v Public Accountants Oversight Committee [2016] SGHC 180
The High Court allowed Leow Kwee Huay's appeal against the PAOC, ruling that cancelling her registration was disproportionate. The court substituted the cancellation with a two-year suspension, emphasizing that sanctions must be proportionate to the gravity of the professional misconduct.