LITT
Try LITT free
Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General
In Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Ang Pek San Lawrence v Singapore Medical Council [2015] SGHC 58
The High Court has the power to order costs against a regulatory body like the Singapore Medical Council in disciplinary proceedings, and such costs are determined by a multi-factorial approach rather than a strict 'costs follow the event' rule.
Stamp Duties (Relief from Stamp Duty upon Acquisition of Shares of Companies) Rules 2013
Overview of the Stamp Duties (Relief from Stamp Duty upon Acquisition of Shares of Companies) Rules 2013, Singapore sl.
Re BJU to be called B
Analysis of [2013] SGHC 138, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2013-07-19.
JK Integrated (Pte Ltd) v 50 Robinson Pte Ltd and another [2015] SGHC 57
In JK Integrated (Pte Ltd) v 50 Robinson Pte Ltd and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Building and construction related contracts, Credit and security — Performance bond.
SINGAPORE MEDICAL COUNCIL v DR SOO SHUENN CHIANG
In SINGAPORE MEDICAL COUNCIL v DR SOO SHUENN CHIANG, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Public Prosecutor v Lisa Ismaniar
In Public Prosecutor v Lisa Ismaniar, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Stamp Duties (Senior Singles) (Remission of ABSD on Replacement Property) Rules 2024
Overview of the Stamp Duties (Senior Singles) (Remission of ABSD on Replacement Property) Rules 2024, Singapore sl.
Seah Hock Thiam v Public Prosecutor
In Seah Hock Thiam v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Dong Jianrong v Jiang Huaguo [2015] SGHC 56
In Dong Jianrong v Jiang Huaguo, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Custody, Family law — Maintenance.
Stamp Duties (Section 23) Order 2017
Overview of the Stamp Duties (Section 23) Order 2017, Singapore sl.
Foo Jee Boo and another v Foo Jhee Tuang and another (Foo Jee Seng, intervener)
In Foo Jee Boo and another v Foo Jhee Tuang and another (Foo Jee Seng, intervener), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Law Society of Singapore v Kurubalan s/o Manickam Rengaraju
In Law Society of Singapore v Kurubalan s/o Manickam Rengaraju, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Re: In the matter of an application by MATTHEW PETER GEARING, Queen’s Counsel of England British Passport No.535188416)
Analysis of [2019] SGHC 249, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2019-10-18.
ARX v ARY [2015] SGHC 55
In ARX v ARY, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Matrimonial assets, Family law — Maintenance.
Zhang Run Zi v Koh Kim Seng and another
In Zhang Run Zi v Koh Kim Seng and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Buergin Juerg v Public Prosecutor
Section 377D(1) of the Penal Code precludes an accused from raising a defence of reasonable mistake as to the age of the victim in a charge under s 376B.
Stamp Duties (Relief from Stamp Duty upon Reconstruction or Amalgamation of Companies) Rules
Overview of the Stamp Duties (Relief from Stamp Duty upon Reconstruction or Amalgamation of Companies) Rules, Singapore sl.
JOSHUA JAMES TAYLOR & Anor v SINFENG MARINE SERVICES PTE. LTD.
In JOSHUA JAMES TAYLOR & Anor v SINFENG MARINE SERVICES PTE. LTD., the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Koh Swee Beng v Public Prosecutor
In Koh Swee Beng v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Re Rogers, Heather QC
Analysis of [2015] SGHC 174, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2015-07-08.
Chan Chee Kien v Performance Motors Ltd [2015] SGHC 54
In Chan Chee Kien v Performance Motors Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — misrepresentation, Contract — Misrepresentation Act.
Quek Yen Fei Kenneth v Yeo Chye Huat
In Quek Yen Fei Kenneth v Yeo Chye Huat, the High Court held the defendant taxi driver 100% liable for a collision. The court rejected claims of contributory negligence, ruling that the defendant's sudden, sharp maneuver across lanes was the sole cause of the accident.
Order under Section 74
Overview of the Order under Section 74, Singapore sl.