LITT
Try LITT free
Ng Kiam Bee v Ng Bee Eng
In Ng Kiam Bee v Ng Bee Eng, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Public Prosecutor v BUT [2019] SGHC 37
In Public Prosecutor v BUT, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Bonds) (No. 10) Regulations 2005
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Bonds) (No. 10) Regulations 2005, Singapore sl.
Thian Sung Construction Pte Ltd v International Elements Pte Ltd
In Thian Sung Construction Pte Ltd v International Elements Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Lam Kwok Leong and another v Yap Koe Siong [2016] SGHC 184
In Lam Kwok Leong and another v Yap Koe Siong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Credit and security — Money and moneylenders.
HI-P INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v TAN CHAI HAU (CHEN ZAIHAO) & 2 Ors
In HI-P INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v TAN CHAI HAU (CHEN ZAIHAO) & 2 Ors, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Ltd Partnership v PT Bakrie Investindo
In Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Ltd Partnership v PT Bakrie Investindo, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 32) Regulations 2004
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 32) Regulations 2004, Singapore sl.
Fujitec Singapore Corp Ltd v GS Engineering & Construction Corp
In Fujitec Singapore Corp Ltd v GS Engineering & Construction Corp, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
THE "MIN RUI" [2016] SGHC 183
In The Min Rui [2016] SGHC 183, the High Court ruled that beneficial ownership of a vessel passes to the buyer upon completion of delivery formalities. The court set aside the vessel's arrest, confirming that the Protocol of Delivery and Acceptance marks the shift of proprietary interests.
Qroi Ltd v Pascoe, Ian and another [2019] SGHC 36
The court held that a claim should not be struck out if there are genuine issues of fact and law that require trial, even if the claim appears weak.
TAN NG KUANG & Anor v LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE
In TAN NG KUANG & Anor v LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Securities and Futures (Exemption of Phillip Financial Pte Ltd and Phillip Securities Pte Ltd) Regulations 2004
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Exemption of Phillip Financial Pte Ltd and Phillip Securities Pte Ltd) Regulations 2004, Singapore sl.
Han Kim Hwa v Public Prosecutor
In Han Kim Hwa v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Oro Negro Drilling Pte Ltd and others v Integradora de Servicios Petroleros Oro Negro, SAPI de CV and others [2019] SGHC 35
In Oro Negro Drilling Pte Ltd and others v Integradora de Servicios Petroleros Oro Negro, SAPI de CV and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Injunctions, Civil Procedure — Appeals.
Paul Patrick Baragwanath and another v Republic of Singapore Yacht Club
The High Court allowed the appeal in Paul Patrick Baragwanath v Republic of Singapore Yacht Club, ruling that damages for vessel trespass must be calculated based on vessel length rather than berth length, aligning with the market value of services provided.
Public Prosecutor v Ong Jack Hong [2016] SGHC 182
In Public Prosecutor v Ong Jack Hong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 31) Regulations 2004
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 31) Regulations 2004, Singapore sl.
OMAE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT PTE LTD v TETSUYA MOTOMURA
In OMAE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT PTE LTD v TETSUYA MOTOMURA, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Lee Seng Eder v Wee Kim Chwee and others
In Lee Seng Eder v Wee Kim Chwee and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Ozak Seiko Co Ltd v Ozak Seiko (S) Pte Ltd and another and other matters [2019] SGHC 34
The Singapore High Court dismissed an application for a derivative action under s 216A of the Companies Act, ruling that the applicant failed to meet notice requirements, lacked good faith due to unexplained delays, and failed to prove the litigation was in the company's best interests.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 22) Regulations 2005
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 22) Regulations 2005, Singapore sl.
Sumoi Paramesvaeri v Fleury, Jeffrey Gerard and another [2016] SGHC 181
In Sumoi Paramesvaeri v Fleury, Jeffrey Gerard and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Equity — Defences, Equity — Estoppel.
Ting Choon Meng v Attorney-General and another appeal
The High Court ruled that the Singapore Government lacks standing to invoke section 15 of the Protection from Harassment Act (POHA). The court set aside orders against Ting Choon Meng, establishing that POHA is intended for individuals, not as a tool for the state to police public discourse.