LITT
Try LITT free
Tjong Mark Edward v Public Prosecutor and another appeal
In Tjong Mark Edward v Public Prosecutor and another appeal, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
LJH Construction & Engineering Co Pte Ltd v Chan Bee Cheng Gracie [2022] SGHC 230
In LJH Construction & Engineering Co Pte Ltd v Chan Bee Cheng Gracie, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Dispute resolution, Building and Construction Law — Statutes and regulations.
OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED v KS ENERGY LIMITED
In OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED v KS ENERGY LIMITED, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Securities and Futures (Exemption of Fortune Real Estate Investment Trust) Regulations 2019
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Exemption of Fortune Real Estate Investment Trust) Regulations 2019, Singapore sl.
Public Prosecutor v Adith s/o Sarvotham
The High Court dismissed the Prosecution's appeal in Public Prosecutor v Adith s/o Sarvotham, ruling that replacing a probation order with reformative training after a sentence has been partially served would constitute double punishment, despite acknowledging errors in the initial sentencing.
Chan Chun Hong v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGHC 75
In Chan Chun Hong v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal procedure and sentencing — Sentencing.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 44) Regulations 2005
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 44) Regulations 2005, Singapore sl.
Chong Kim Beng v Lim Ka Poh (trading as Mysteel Engineering Contractor) and others
The High Court dismissed Chong Kim Beng's appeal, ruling that a breach of duty, such as failing to conduct a risk assessment, does not automatically establish causation. The court affirmed that plaintiffs must provide specific evidence linking an omission to the injury sustained.
Uday Mehra v L Capital Asia Advisors and others [2022] SGHC 23
In Uday Mehra v L Capital Asia Advisors and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms, Contract — Termination.
Pacific Marine & Shipbuilding Pte Ltd v Xin Ming Hua Pte Ltd
In Pacific Marine & Shipbuilding Pte Ltd v Xin Ming Hua Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Toyota Tsusho (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v United Overseas Bank Ltd & another [2016] SGHC 74
In Toyota Tsusho (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v United Overseas Bank Ltd & another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Discovery of documents.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 44) Regulations 2004
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 44) Regulations 2004, Singapore sl.
ACB v Thomson Medical Pte Ltd and others
In ACB v Thomson Medical Pte Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
TAN WEI LEONG (CHEN WEILONG) v TAN LEE CHIN (CHEN LIJIN) & 2 Ors
In TAN WEI LEONG (CHEN WEILONG) v TAN LEE CHIN (CHEN LIJIN) & 2 Ors, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Song Jianbo v Sunmax Global Capital Fund 1 Pte Ltd [2022] SGHC 229
In Song Jianbo v Sunmax Global Capital Fund 1 Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Insolvency Law — Winding up.
Silica Investors Limited v Tomolugen Holdings Limited and others
The High Court dismissed appeals by defendants, affirming the refusal to stay proceedings under the International Arbitration Act. It ruled that minority oppression claims are non-arbitrable when they involve third-party shareholders and remedies outside an arbitral tribunal's statutory powers.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 43) Regulations 2005
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 43) Regulations 2005, Singapore sl.
Phua Han Chuan Jeffery v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGHC 73
In Phua Han Chuan Jeffery v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences.
LIEW KHOON FONG @ LIEW FONG v GOH YONG CHIANG KELVIN & Anor
In LIEW KHOON FONG @ LIEW FONG v GOH YONG CHIANG KELVIN & Anor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Diora-Ace Ltd and others v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3661 and others
In Diora-Ace Ltd and others v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3661 and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Syed Ibrahim Shaik Mohideen v Wavoo Abdusalam Shahul Hameed and others [2022] SGHC 228
In Syed Ibrahim Shaik Mohideen v Wavoo Abdusalam Shahul Hameed and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Statutory derivative action.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 43) Regulations 2004
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 43) Regulations 2004, Singapore sl.
Tan Kim Huat Jerry v Public Prosecutor
In Tan Kim Huat Jerry v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
HOU CHAO (In his personal capacity and also in his representative capacity on behalf of Yong Zhen Yuan Pte. Ltd.) v GU XIAOLAN & 2 Ors
A common law derivative action requires the plaintiff to demonstrate a prima facie case of wrongdoing and locus standi under the 'fraud on the minority' exception. The court retains discretion to deny leave if the action is not in the company's best interests or is an abuse of pr