LITT
Try LITT free
TING JUN HENG V YAP KOK HUA & ANOR
In TING JUN HENG v YAP KOK HUA & ANOR, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Public Prosecutor v Saiful Rizam bin Assim and other appeals
The High Court dismissed the Prosecution's appeal against the Respondents' sentences. While noting reformative training was initially appropriate, the Court declined to substitute it for imprisonment, citing the risk of 'double punishment' after significant custodial time had already been served.
Bagadiya Brothers (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Ghanashyam Misra & Sons Pte Ltd [2022] SGHC 246
In Bagadiya Brothers (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Ghanashyam Misra & Sons Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award.
SINTALOW HARDWARE PTE LTD v OSK ENGINEERING PTE. LTD.
In SINTALOW HARDWARE PTE LTD v OSK ENGINEERING PTE. LTD., the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Arnold William v Tanoto Shipyard Pte Ltd and another appeal [2016] SGHC 89
The High Court allowed the plaintiff's appeal in Arnold William v Tanoto Shipyard, ruling that expert testimony outside of pleaded cases is inadmissible. The court reaffirmed that the duty to provide a safe system of work applies regardless of a worker's status as an independent contractor.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Bonds) (No. 24) Regulations 2004
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Bonds) (No. 24) Regulations 2004, Singapore sl.
ONG KIAN PENG JULIAN v SERENE TIONG SZE YIN
The High Court allowed the appeal in Ong Kian Peng Julian v Serene Tiong Sze Yin, ruling the respondent failed to prove justification for defamation. While the appellant won his libel claim, the court noted the public exposure of his private conduct resulted in a Pyrrhic victory.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Bonds) (No. 23) Regulations 2004
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Bonds) (No. 23) Regulations 2004, Singapore sl.
Chiam Heng Hsien (on his own behalf and as partner of Mitre Hotel Proprietors) v Chiam Heng Chow (executor of the estate of Chiam Toh Say, deceased) and others
In Chiam Heng Hsien (on his own behalf and as partner of Mitre Hotel Proprietors) v Chiam Heng Chow (executor of the estate of Chiam Toh Say, deceased) and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib and others [2022] SGHC 245
In British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Parties.
S. Pacific Resources Ltd v Tomolugen Holdings Ltd [2016] SGHC 88
In S. Pacific Resources Ltd v Tomolugen Holdings Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms, Contract — Consideration.
CHONG KUM HENG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
In CHONG KUM HENG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v ANDREW KOH WEIWEN
In PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v ANDREW KOH WEIWEN, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Bonds) (No. 27) Regulations 2005
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Bonds) (No. 27) Regulations 2005, Singapore sl.
Public Prosecutor v Low Chuan Woo
In Public Prosecutor v Low Chuan Woo, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
ABC v Public Prosecutor [2022] SGHC 244
In ABC v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing, Criminal Law — Offences.
VITOL ASIA PTE LTD v MACHLOGIC SINGAPORE PTE LTD
In VITOL ASIA PTE LTD v MACHLOGIC SINGAPORE PTE LTD, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Law Society of Singapore v Thirumurthy Ayernaar Pambayan [2016] SGHC 87
In Law Society of Singapore v Thirumurthy Ayernaar Pambayan, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Professional Conduct, Legal Profession — Disciplinary Proceedings.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 52) Regulations 2005
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 52) Regulations 2005, Singapore sl.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v MOHAMAD YAZID BIN MD YUSOF & 2 Ors
In PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v MOHAMAD YAZID BIN MD YUSOF & 2 Ors, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Arun Kaliamurthy and others v Public Prosecutor and another matter
The High Court ordered solicitor Mr Ravi to pay personal costs after finding his filing of an unmeritorious motion constituted an abuse of process. The court ruled his conduct fell below the standard of reasonable competence, prioritizing the solicitor's duty to the court over client instructions.
On Site Car Accessories.SG (KEL Services) v Tang Mun Wah Jerry [2022] SGHC 243
The High Court allowed the appeal in On Site Car Accessories.SG v Tang Mun Wah Jerry, awarding $20,000 in damages for defamation. The court ruled that while corporate entities cannot claim aggravated damages, the defendant's malice and refusal to retract statements justified the award.
Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 51) Regulations 2005
Overview of the Securities and Futures (Market Conduct) (Exemption for Stabilising Action in respect of Dealings in Notes) (No. 51) Regulations 2005, Singapore sl.
BAJ v BAK and another matter [2016] SGHC 86
In BAJ v BAK and another matter, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Matrimonial assets.