LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

Selvarajan James v Public Prosecutor [2000] SGHC 171

The court held that the prosecution is not under a general duty to disclose witness statements to the defence in criminal proceedings, and that fresh evidence will only be admitted on appeal if it satisfies the three-fold test in Ladd v Marshall.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Credit Corporation (M) Bhd v Public Prosecutor [2000] SGHC 170

Forfeiture of a vehicle used in the commission of an immigration offence under s 49(6) of the Immigration Act is mandatory once the conditions of the offence and the use of the vehicle are met, regardless of the innocence of the vehicle owner.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Kamla Lal Hiranand v Harilela Padma Hari and Others [2000] SGHC 17

Documents meant to be testamentary in character which do not comply with the Wills Act cannot become virtual wills by being regarded as declarations of trust.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

The Law Society of Singapore v Disciplinary Committee [2000] SGHC 169

Solicitors who accept an invitation to be on a developer's panel for conveyancing services do not necessarily commit professional misconduct or touting, provided they do not participate in a scheme that unduly influences or coerces purchasers in their choice of solicitor.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

MeesPierson NV v Bay Pacific (S) Pte Ltd and Others [2000] SGHC 168

In MeesPierson NV v Bay Pacific (S) Pte Ltd, the High Court dismissed the bank's claim for restitution, ruling that a bank cannot recover funds paid under a letter of credit for forged documents if the presenter is innocent, emphasizing strict adherence to UCP 500 contractual obligations.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Andy Sofiaan bin Rahmad [2000] SGHC 167

Where a respondent is sentenced for offences committed during the supervision period following release from a reformative training centre, the existing reformative training sentence ceases to have effect and the new reformative training sentence should commence on the date of con

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd v United Eng Contractors Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 166

An arbitration clause in a standard form contract is not incorporated into a subcontract by mere reference to the existence of the standard form document; clear and specific language is required to incorporate such a collateral agreement.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Wee Kah Lee v Silverdale Investment Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 165

In Wee Kah Lee v Silverdale Investment Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 165, the High Court dismissed a claim for immediate repayment of shareholder loans, ruling that repayment was impliedly tied to the completion of the joint venture project rather than being repayable on demand.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Kwan Peng Hong v Public Prosecutor [2000] SGHC 164

The court held that there is no special legal status for female witnesses in sexual offence cases, and that corroboration is not a strict legal requirement, provided the evidence is unusually compelling or convincing.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Tang Hsiu Lan v Pua Ai Seok and Others [2000] SGHC 163

The court held that the plaintiff was precluded from asserting proprietary claims against the 1st to 3rd defendants because the issues had been or should have been canvassed in previous proceedings, and there was no evidence to support the imposition of a constructive trust.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Linda Lai Swee Lin v Public Service Commission [2000] SGHC 162

The court held that an application for judicial review by a public employee regarding termination of service may be maintainable if it raises an arguable case of public law, particularly where there are allegations of procedural impropriety or breach of natural justice.

Sushant Shukla· ·16 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Tan Siew Lam and Another [2000] SGHC 161

Possession of a controlled drug is satisfied by knowledge of the existence of the thing itself, and ignorance or mistake as to its qualities (e.g. morphine vs heroin) is not an excuse.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Hong Huat Development Co (Pte) Ltd v Hiap Hong & Company Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 160

The court has the power to vary an arbitrator's award on costs after it has determined non-cost issues in the arbitration.

Sushant Shukla· ·16 min read
Singapore

Luis Chang Soh v Comwealth Investments & Trading Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 16

The court granted a stay of proceedings in favour of a pending foreign action in Paris, applying the principle of forum non conveniens, as the plaintiff was found to be abusing the court process by initiating multiple actions to avoid the foreign jurisdiction.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore [2000] SGHC 159

The Council of the Law Society has a duty to consider whether a complaint falls within s 85(1) of the Legal Profession Act, but it should not consider whether the complaint discloses a prima facie case.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Changhe International Investments Pte Ltd (fka Druidstone Pte Ltd) v Banque International A Luxembourg Bil (Asia) Ltd [2000] SGHC 158

An assistant registrar lacks jurisdiction to vary or overturn the order of another assistant registrar; the proper course for a party aggrieved by such an order is to file an appeal.

Sushant Shukla· ·11 min read
Singapore

Siew Yit Beng v Public Prosecutor [2000] SGHC 157

The court held that the appellant's confession was admissible and that her consent to sexual intercourse was not vitiated under s 90(a) of the Penal Code, as she understood the nature of the act and engaged in it voluntarily in exchange for medical treatment.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

The Management Corporation Strata Title No 607 v Tan Kia Sai and Others [2000] SGHC 156

The court determined the scope of an easement granted in a deed of indenture, holding that it included the right to park vehicles but not to store goods.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Tay Beng Guan Albert [2000] SGHC 155

A plea of guilt has little or no mitigating value when the accused is caught red-handed, and offences involving high degrees of planning and potential for repeated viewing of private moments merit deterrent custodial sentences.

Sushant Shukla· ·11 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Heah Lian Khin [2000] SGHC 154

The phrase 'previous inconsistent or contradictory statement' in s 147(3) of the Evidence Act encompasses a witness who deliberately and falsely claims an inability to recall material facts, allowing such a statement to be admitted as substantive evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Thakral Brothers (Private) Ltd and Others [2000] SGHC 153

In Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Thakral Brothers (Private) Ltd [2000] SGHC 153, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' claim, ruling that the defendants' Anton Piller-style order took priority. The case clarifies the timing requirements for creditor priority under the Debtors Act.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Yow Mee Lan v Chen Kai Buan [2000] SGHC 152

The court held that the starting point for division of matrimonial assets is not an assumption of equal contribution, but rather a broad-brush approach considering all factors under s 112 of the Women's Charter to achieve a just and equitable division.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Choong Wai Phwee And Others (Trustees of Cheng Liam Um Vegetarian Temple) v Chileon Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 151

The absence of power of a charity trustee to sell trust property does not make the sale void, but voidable. An agreement to sell charity land is valid even if the power of sale is not yet obtained, provided it is obtained by the time of conveyance.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Leong Mei Chuan v David Chan Texk Hock [2000] SGHC 150

The court held that an application to amend a notice of appeal that effectively seeks to appeal against a part of a decision out of time must satisfy the requirements for extending time for filing a notice of appeal, including considering the length of delay, reasons for delay, c

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read