LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

Tan Yeow Khoon and Another v The Law Society of Singapore [2001] SGHC 129

The court held that it has no jurisdiction to inquire into a complaint against an advocate and solicitor that has not been first inquired into by an Inquiry Committee and determined by the Council of the Law Society.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

In te Matter of Section 102 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161) revised Edition 2001 v In the Matter of an application by Nirmal Singh s/o Fauja Singh [2001] SGHC 128

In In te Matter of Section 102 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161) revised Edition 2001 v In the Matter of an application by Nirmal Singh s/o Fauja Singh, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·2 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Noor bin Abdullah [2001] SGHC 127

The court held that the accused failed to rebut the prosecution's case for drug trafficking, as the presence of trafficking accessories and the lack of a credible consumption defence indicated trafficking activity.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 19) Order 2013

Overview of the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 19) Order 2013, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Newspeed International Limited v Citus Trading Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 126

A party cannot challenge an arbitration award in the enforcing court on grounds that were already raised and rejected by the courts of the seat of arbitration.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

The "Arktis Fighter" [2001] SGHC 124

The court held that security for an arrested vessel should cover the plaintiff's reasonably best arguable case, including interest and costs, but should not exceed the value of the vessel, and that ex parte applications for inspection should be made only in exceptional circumstan

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Tan Ngin Hai v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 122

Preventive detention is appropriate for a recalcitrant offender who has proven by his history of criminal behaviour to be a menace to society, regardless of whether the specific offence involved violence or dishonesty.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Nomura Regionalisation Venture Fund Ltd v Ethical Investments Ltd [2001] SGHC 121

The court granted relief against forfeiture of shares where the forfeiture provision was essentially a penalty to secure payment, and the notice of forfeiture was technically invalid.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Industrial & Commercial Bank Ltd v Banco Ambrosiano Veneto S.P.A. [2001] SGHC 120

Authenticated SWIFT messages have the legal effect of binding the sender bank according to their contents, as the system is designed to avoid arguments regarding authority.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 4) Order 2017

Overview of the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 4) Order 2017, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Chiu Teng Construction Co Pte Ltd v The Hartford Insurance Company (Singapore) Ltd (formerly known as The People's Insurance Co Ltd) [2001] SGHC 119

An insurer is entitled to raise policy defences against a third party who has stepped into the shoes of the insured under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act, and a final judgment against the insured is conclusive evidence of liability and quantum against the insurer.

Sushant Shukla· ·15 min read
Singapore

Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 18) Order 2013

Overview of the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 18) Order 2013, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Chan Fook Kee v Chan Siew Fong [2001] SGHC 118

In Chan Fook Kee v Chan Siew Fong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·2 min read
Singapore

Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 17) Order 2013

Overview of the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 17) Order 2013, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Kay Swee Tuan v Chia Shih Ching James [2001] SGHC 117

The High Court dismissed an appeal against the division of matrimonial assets, upholding the district judge's evaluation of the evidence. The court found no merit in the appellant's claims regarding mortgage liabilities and alleged asset losses.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 16) Order 2013

Overview of the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 16) Order 2013, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Thenmoli d/o Periasamy v Liew Yee Cheong [2001] SGHC 116

The court held that pre-trial periods must be deducted from post-trial multipliers in dependency claims, and that damages for children should be based on the deceased's contribution rather than the full cost of upkeep.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 15) Order 2013

Overview of the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 15) Order 2013, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 14) Order 2013

Overview of the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 14) Order 2013, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Lewis Christine v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 113

The case confirms that conduct subsequent to an offence, such as attempting to escape from detention, is relevant evidence of guilt under s 8(2) of the Evidence Act and can corroborate the testimony of prosecution witnesses.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 13) Order 2013

Overview of the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 13) Order 2013, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Lim Lye Kim [2001] SGHC 112

In Public Prosecutor v Lim Lye Kim, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 12) Order 2013

Overview of the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 12) Order 2013, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 11) Order 2013

Overview of the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) (Exemption from Prohibition against Dealing) (No. 11) Order 2013, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read