LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

In the Matter of Part V of the Bankruptcy Act 1995(Cap20) and In the Matter of an Application for an Interim Order and In the Matter of a Voluntary Arrangement by Lek Kee Meng [2001] SGHC 181

In In the Matter of Part v of the Bankruptcy Act 1995(Cap20) and In the Matter of an Application for an Interim Order and In the Matter of a Voluntary Arrangement by Lek Kee Meng, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Variable Capital Companies (Application of Bankruptcy Act Provisions) Regulations 2020

Overview of the Variable Capital Companies (Application of Bankruptcy Act Provisions) Regulations 2020, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Re Voluntary Arrangment by Lek Kee Meng [2001] SGHC 180

Analysis of [2001] SGHC 180, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-07-13.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Variable Capital Companies Regulations 2020

Overview of the Variable Capital Companies Regulations 2020, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Kim Eng Securities (Pte) Ltd v Ong Eng Poh [2001] SGHC 18

In Kim Eng Securities v Ong Eng Poh [2001] SGHC 18, the High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' claims, allowed Chu's counterclaim for unauthorized appropriation of sale proceeds, and dismissed Ching's counterclaim for inconsistent pleading regarding her nominee status.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Variable Capital Companies (Prescribed Accounting Standards) Regulations 2020

Overview of the Variable Capital Companies (Prescribed Accounting Standards) Regulations 2020, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Wellform Construction Pte Ltd v Lay Sing Construction Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 12

The Singapore High Court ruled in favor of Wellform Construction, ordering Lay Sing to pay $222,938.43 in profit shares. The court rejected Lay Sing's attempt to reduce payments through fabricated sub-contract expenses, affirming that profit-sharing must be based on substantiated project costs.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Variable Capital Companies (Revision of Defective Financial Statements, or Consolidated Financial Statements or Balance Sheet) Regulations 2020

Overview of the Variable Capital Companies (Revision of Defective Financial Statements, or Consolidated Financial Statements or Balance Sheet) Regulations 2020, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Panatron Pte Ltd and Another v Lee Cheow Lee and Another

A plaintiff in an action for deceit need not show that the fraudulent misrepresentation was the sole cause of his action; it is sufficient if the misrepresentation played a real and substantial part in inducing the plaintiff to act. Furthermore, it is no defence to a claim for fr

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Vigilante Corps Regulations

Overview of the Vigilante Corps Regulations, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Trade Unions Regulations

Overview of the Trade Unions Regulations, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction (S) Pte Ltd

An innocent party is not required to accept an offer of partial performance from a contract-breaker if it is unreasonable to do so in the circumstances, and the court will not weigh the innocent party's remedial measures in 'nice scales' when they are placed in an emergency by th

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

SH Sameyeh Pte Ltd v Hassan's Carpets Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 179

The corporate veil will only be lifted if the company was used as a means of committing a fraud, and the 'single economic unit' argument is generally only relevant for statutory or document interpretation, not for pursuing shareholders for a company's commercial debt.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Vigilante Corps (Pay and Allowances) Regulations

Overview of the Vigilante Corps (Pay and Allowances) Regulations, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Lau Ah Lang and Others v Chan Huang Seng and Others [2001] SGHC 178

In Lau Ah Lang v Chan Huang Seng [2001], the High Court ruled that an EOGM notice failing to disclose the removal of trustees was fundamentally defective. The court invalidated the resulting resolutions, emphasizing that procedural fairness and transparency override majority support in governance.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Vulnerable Adults (Notice to Attend Court) Regulations 2018

Overview of the Vulnerable Adults (Notice to Attend Court) Regulations 2018, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Cosmos Shipping Co Ltd v Manson Shipping (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 176

A party is not liable on a contract simply because they are part of a group of companies or because they share communication facilities with the contracting party.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Vulnerable Adults (Bail and Personal Bond) Regulations 2018

Overview of the Vulnerable Adults (Bail and Personal Bond) Regulations 2018, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Pick Hoo Kee [2001] SGHC 175

The court emphasizes that severe punishment is required for those who take advantage of vulnerable and defenceless victims, particularly in cases of rape by a family member.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Vulnerable Adults (Managers of Places of Temporary Care and Protection and Places of Safety) Regulations 2018

Overview of the Vulnerable Adults (Managers of Places of Temporary Care and Protection and Places of Safety) Regulations 2018, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey v Tan Poh Leng Stanley

The Court of Appeal ruled that an arbitral tribunal remains seized of its mandate until a final award, including costs, is issued. The decision clarifies that the concept of 'partial functus officio' is incompatible with the UNCITRAL Model Law, reversing the High Court's previous setting aside.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

In the Matter of Section 102 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161) Revised Edition 2001 v In the Matter of an application by Nirmal singh s/o Fauja Singh [2001] SGHC 174

In In the Matter of Section 102 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161) Revised Edition 2001 v In the Matter of an application by Nirmal singh s/o Fauja Singh, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·2 min read
Singapore

Vulnerable Adults (Review Board) Regulations 2018

Overview of the Vulnerable Adults (Review Board) Regulations 2018, Singapore sl.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Re Nirmal Singh s/o Fauja Singh [2001] SGHC 173

The court held that a significantly longer period than five years must elapse after a striking-off order before an application for reinstatement can be entertained, and that the applicant's conduct did not warrant restoration.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read