LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

HG Metal Manufacturing Ltd v Nam Tat Hardware Co (a firm) [2006] SGHC 37

A contract is not terminated by a party's expression of frustration or statement that the contract is 'useless' unless it clearly and unequivocally conveys an intention to treat the contract as at an end.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

The "Mezen" [2006] SGHC 35

The court held that 'goods carried in a ship' under section 3(1)(g) of the High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act refers only to goods carried as cargo, meaning items transported for the purpose of being conveyed from one place to another.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Sheares Betty Hang Kiu v Chow Kwok Chi and Others [2006] SGHC 34

A completely constituted trust is immediately binding upon the settlor and his personal representatives unless a power of revocation has been expressly reserved, and the acid test for whether an instrument is testamentary is whether it is revocable.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Fornet Enterprise Co Ltd v Howell Universal Pte Ltd and Others [2006] SGHC 33

The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of a mercantile agency relationship or that the defendants breached any agreement, and that the conspiracy claim was not proven.

Sushant Shukla· ·15 min read
Singapore

Siah Eng Hock v Tan Cheng Huat and Another [2006] SGHC 32

The court found the plaintiff solely liable for the accident due to overwhelming objective evidence contradicting his testimony, including the location of the collision on the bus and the testimony of an independent witness.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Jenton Overseas Investment Pte Ltd v Townsing Henry George [2006] SGHC 31

A director breaches fiduciary duties by acting in the interests of a third party (Normandy) rather than the company (NQF) and by unilaterally transferring company funds to satisfy a debt that was not clearly owed by the company.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

The Global 1 [2006] SGHC 30

An in rem action, once commenced, continues as such unless altered by amendment, but if the defendant enters an appearance, the action proceeds as both an in rem and in personam action. If the in rem jurisdiction was never properly invoked, the court may allow an amendment to the

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Forefront Medical Technology (Pte) Ltd v Modern-Pak Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 3

The court held that the defendant had discharged its contractual obligations regarding material suitability by providing the required Certificates of Analysis from the specified supplier, May Polyester Films Sdn Bhd.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Wah Heng Glass Holdings Pte Ltd v Diethelm Keller Engineering Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 29

The court held that the plaintiff had proven the existence of the contracts and the defendant failed to prove its counterclaims for defective work and material due to lack of evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Skylift Consolidator (Pte) Ltd (Direct Services (HK) Ltd, Third Party) [2006] SGHC 28

A limitation of liability clause relates to liability rather than the quantum of damages, and therefore must be specifically pleaded in accordance with the Rules of Court.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Silberline Asia Pacific Inc v Lim Yong Wah Allan and Others [2006] SGHC 27

A stay of execution of a summary judgment pending the trial of a counterclaim is discretionary and requires a sufficient connection between the claim and the counterclaim, as well as a plausible counterclaim.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Sin Leng Industries Pte Ltd v Ong Chai Teck and Others [2006] SGHC 25

An application to amend pleadings in the middle of a trial will be refused if it introduces a new case that causes prejudice to the other party which cannot be compensated by costs, especially when the party seeking the amendment has been negligent in the conduct of its litigatio

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Geowin Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Management Corporation Strata Title No 1256 [2006] SGHC 245

An expert's decision is binding on the parties as a matter of contract, and the court will not intervene to set it aside in the absence of fraud, collusion, or a material breach of the expert's terms of appointment.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2006] SGHC 244

In an application to set aside a judgment obtained in the absence of a party at trial, the most important consideration is the reason for the party's absence. Unless the absence was due to accident or mistake rather than being deliberate, the court is unlikely to allow a rehearin

Sushant Shukla· ·15 min read
Singapore

Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG and Another [2006] SGHC 243

The court allowed the plaintiff to amend its pleadings during the trial because the delay was not substantial and did not cause prejudice to the defendant, and the amendments were sufficiently clear to be understood.

Sushant Shukla· ·15 min read
Singapore

Compact Metal Industries Ltd v PPG Industries (Singapore) Ltd [2006] SGHC 242

The court held that the defendant was in breach of the implied conditions of satisfactory quality and fitness for purpose under the Sale of Goods Act, as the paint supplied was inherently incapable of producing a consistent finish.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Firstlink Energy Pte Ltd v Creanovate Pte Ltd and Another Action [2006] SGHC 240

The court held that the term 'loan' in sections 162 and 163 of the Companies Act includes 'advances', and that directors who breach their fiduciary duties are liable to make restitution to the company.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Siti Hajar bte Abdullah v Public Prosecutor [2006] SGHC 24

A 'special reason' for exemption from mandatory disqualification under s 3(3) of the MVA must be a mitigating or extenuating circumstance directly connected with the commission of the offence, not merely a circumstance peculiar to the offender.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Nautical Concept Pte Ltd v Jeffery Mark Richard and Another [2006] SGHC 239

An application for a trade mark is made in bad faith if it involves dealings that fall short of standards of acceptable commercial behaviour, even if the marks are not identical or confusingly similar.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Smith & Associates Far East Ltd v Britestone Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 238

A buyer can recover damages from a seller for a settlement paid to a third party in a chain of contracts if the damages were within the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time of the contract.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

Ng Geok Eng v Public Prosecutor [2006] SGHC 232

Market rigging and false trading offences under s 197(1) SFA should attract custodial sentences in appropriate cases to deter market manipulation, and the sentencing approach for unauthorised share trading under s 201(b) SFA should distinguish between cases involving deception of

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Abdul Aziz bin Mohamed Yatim v Rubiah bte Rahmat [2006] SGHC 231

Civil contempt proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature and personal to the alleged contemnor; therefore, they abate upon the death of the alleged contemnor and cannot be continued against their personal representative.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Lock Yeng Fun (mw) v Chua Hock Chye [2006] SGHC 230

The court held that in a long marriage where the wife's financial contributions were minimal but she performed the role of homemaker, an award of 40% of the matrimonial assets was just and equitable.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Gan Too Cheh v Public Prosecutor [2006] SGHC 23

Findings of fact by a trial judge based on the credibility of witnesses should not be overturned unless they are plainly wrong or against the weight of the evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read