LITT
Try LITT free
Seiko Epson Corp v Sepoms Technology Pte Ltd and Another [2007] SGHC 81
The court held that a consent judgment for patent infringement is interlocutory in nature, and the defendant is not estopped from raising the defence of innocent infringement under s 69(1) of the Patents Act during the subsequent inquiry for the assessment of profits.
Dextra Asia Co Ltd and Another v Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd [2007] SGHC 51
The court held that the further evidence did not establish that the Bartec patent was invalid due to prior use, as the alleged admissions were merely commercial bluffs made during royalty negotiations.
Ship's Equipment Centre Bremen GmbH v Fuji Trading (Singapore) Pte Ltd and others and another suit
The court dismissed the plaintiff's application to amend its patent claims because the amendments disclosed additional matter, extended the scope of protection, and were not clear or concise. Furthermore, the court exercised its discretion to refuse the amendments due to the plai
Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd v Khek Tai Ting (trading as Soon Heng Digitax)
Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd v Khek Tai Ting (trading as Soon Heng Digitax) [2011] SGHC 36 is a significant High Court decision concerning the validity and infringement of Singapore Patent No 89534, which related to a "transportation status display system" primarily utilized