LITT
Try LITT free
Law Society of Singapore v Govindan Balan Nair [2020] SGHC 174
In Law Society of Singapore v Govindan Balan Nair, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Disciplinary proceedings, Legal Profession — Professional conduct.
The Law Society of Singapore v Tan Chun Chuen, Malcolm [2020] SGHC 166
In The Law Society of Singapore v Tan Chun Chuen, Malcolm, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Conflict of interest, Legal Profession — Professional conduct.
Tan Ng Kuang and another v Law Society of Singapore [2020] SGHC 127
In Tan Ng Kuang and another v Law Society of Singapore, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Disciplinary proceedings, Legal Profession — Professional conduct.
WIH v WII [2020] SGHCF 1
In WIH v WII, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Bill of costs.
Law Society of Singapore v Dhanwant Singh [2019] SGHC 290
In Law Society of Singapore v Dhanwant Singh, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Disciplinary proceedings, Statutory interpretation — Construction of statute.
Choy Chee Yean v Law Society of Singapore and another [2019] SGHC 271
In Choy Chee Yean v Law Society of Singapore and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Reinstatement.
JWR Pte Ltd v Syn Kok Kay (trading as Patrick Chin Syn & Co) [2019] SGHC 253
In JWR Pte Ltd v Syn Kok Kay (trading as Patrick Chin Syn & Co), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Bill of costs.
Re Gearing, Matthew Peter QC [2019] SGHC 249
The court held that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the issues in the case were sufficiently complex to warrant the admission of foreign senior counsel under the ad hoc admissions regime.
Re Salwant Singh s/o Amer Singh [2019] SGHC 225
The court held that a prima facie case for an investigation into alleged misconduct by Legal Service Officers was not established, and that in any event, the inordinate delay in bringing the complaint militated against the exercise of the court's discretion to grant leave.
Law Society of Singapore v G B Vasudeven [2019] SGHC 187
Misconduct involving dishonesty by a solicitor is viewed with utmost gravity and generally warrants striking off, especially where there is a violation of the solicitor-client relationship and the creation of fictitious court documents.
Re Harish Salve and another appeal [2018] SGCA 6
Analysis of [2018] SGCA 6, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2018-01-25.
TAJUDIN BIN GULAM RASUL & Anor v SURIAYA BINTE HAJA MOHIDEEN
The court has the inherent power to impose personal costs on advocates and solicitors who cite fictitious AI-generated authorities, based on a three-stage test assessing improper conduct, unnecessary costs, and just compensation.
Kuek Siang Wei and another v Kuek Siew Chew [2015] SGCA 39
In Kuek Siang Wei and another v Kuek Siew Chew, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Deeds and Other Instruments — Deeds, Legal Profession — Conflict of interest.
Lam Hwa Engineering & Trading Pte Ltd v Yang Qiang [2014] SGCA 3
In Lam Hwa Engineering & Trading Pte Ltd v Yang Qiang, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs, Legal Profession — Duties.
Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC [2014] SGCA 25
Case Details * Citation: [2014] SGCA 25 * Case Number: Civil Appeals Nos 68, 69, 70 and 71 of 2013 * Decision Date: 16 May 2014 * Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore * Coram: Sundaresh Menon
Manjit Singh s/o Kirpal Singh and another v Attorney-General [2013] SGCA 45
In Manjit Singh s/o Kirpal Singh and another v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law, Legal Profession.
Law Society of Singapore v Top Ten Entertainment Pte Ltd [2011] SGCA 11
In Law Society of Singapore v Top Ten Entertainment Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Disciplinary Procedures.
Lim Hsi-Wei Marc v Orix Capital Ltd and another and another appeal [2010] SGCA 24
In Lim Hsi-Wei Marc v Orix Capital Ltd and another and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Partnership, Legal Profession.
Lock Han Chng Jonathan (Jonathan Luo Hancheng) v Goh Jessiline [2007] SGCA 56
In Lock Han Chng Jonathan (Jonathan Luo Hancheng) v Goh Jessiline, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Courts and Jurisdiction — Judges, Legal Profession — Professional conduct.
Re Platts-Mills Mark Fortescue QC [2005] SGCA 57
Analysis of [2005] SGCA 57, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2005-12-06.
Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Chor Pee & Partners [2005] SGCA 53
In Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Chor Pee & Partners, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Remuneration.
Lau Liat Meng & Co v Lum Kai Keng [2003] SGCA 24
Case Details * Citation: Lau Liat Meng & Co v Lum Kai Keng [2003] SGCA 24 (eLitigation) * Case Number: CA 147/2002 * Decision Date: 28 May 2003 * Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore (No 4) [2002] SGCA 24
In Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore (No 4), the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Disciplinary procedures, Legal Profession — Professional conduct.
Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore (No 3) [2001] SGCA 54
In Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore [2001], the Court of Appeal set aside an order allowing third-party intervention, ruling that inherent jurisdiction requires compelling reasons and a clear need, rather than mere interest in the outcome of disciplinary proceedings.