LITT
Try LITT free
MZ v NA [2006] SGHC 95
The court held that an appeal against a trial judge's assessment of maintenance and division of matrimonial assets must be supported by evidence of a change in circumstances or clear flaws in the trial judge's reasoning, and that minor adjustments for idiosyncratic reasons are no
Lee Pauline Bradnam v Lee Thien Terh George [2006] SGHC 84
Periodic maintenance orders are not registrable under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act (RECJA) because they are not final and conclusive judgments for a defined sum payable immediately.
Lim Ngeok Yuen v Lim Soon Heng Victor [2006] SGHC 83
The court held that in dividing matrimonial assets, the court must consider the marriage as a whole, including both financial and non-financial contributions, rather than focusing solely on financial contributions to specific assets.
Wong Suit Kam v Tan Beng Wah Benny [2006] SGHC 56
In Wong Suit Kam v Tan Beng Wah Benny [2006] SGHC 56, the High Court ordered a 55:45 division of matrimonial assets in favor of the husband and awarded the wife $144,000 in lump sum maintenance, adjusted for property transfer offsets between the parties.
LV v LW (divorce: ancillary matters) [2006] SGHC 50
The court held that lottery winnings are part of the matrimonial assets and that the respondent's attempt to conceal assets through a third party was improbable and rejected.
EB v EC (divorce: maintenance of stepchildren) [2006] SGHC 44
The duty to maintain a child under s 70(1) of the Women's Charter applies to matrimonial proceedings under Part X, and the conjunction 'or' in s 70(1) should be read as 'and' such that the duty arises when neither biological parent maintains the child.
Low Geok Khim (administratrix of the estate of Low Kim Tah, deceased) v Low Geok Bian and Others [2006] SGHC 41
The court held that the presumption of advancement applies to transfers between a father and child, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the moneys in the joint accounts vested in the surviving account holder.
Lock Yeng Fun (mw) v Chua Hock Chye [2006] SGHC 230
The court held that in a long marriage where the wife's financial contributions were minimal but she performed the role of homemaker, an award of 40% of the matrimonial assets was just and equitable.
NK v NL [2006] SGHC 204
The court determined the division of matrimonial assets and custody arrangements based on the parties' contributions and the welfare of the children, rejecting claims for double-counting of contributions and excessive maintenance.
NI v NJ [2006] SGHC 198
The court held that maintenance and division of assets must be assessed holistically, taking into account the new realities of a failed marriage, including the earning capacity of the parties and the need to provide for children.
BF v BG [2006] SGHC 197
The judgment in BF v BG [2006] SGHC 197 represents a comprehensive appellate review of ancillary matters following the dissolution of a marriage between two Australian nationals domiciled in Singapore. The case is particularly significant for its detailed examination of the court
Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai Huah [2006] SGHC 177
The court applied the broad-brush approach to the division of matrimonial assets under s 112 of the Women's Charter, noting that the wife's lack of direct contribution and the husband's financial liabilities were key factors.
Chen Siew Hwee v Low Kee Guan (Wong Yong Yee, co-respondent) [2006] SGHC 172
The court held that shares acquired by a husband as a gift prior to marriage do not form part of the matrimonial pool under s 112(10) of the Women's Charter, as they were not substantially improved during the marriage and do not constitute a matrimonial home.
Koh Mui Noi v Tan Tian Seong [2006] SGHC 141
The decision in [2006] SGHC 141 represents a meticulous judicial calibration of maintenance and asset division following the dissolution of a long-term marriage. The proceedings involved Tan Tian Seong (the Husband) and Koh Mui Noi (the Wife), who were married in 1984 and separat
Noor Azizan bte Colony (alias Noor Azizan bte Mohamed Noor) v Tan Lip Chin (alias Izak Tan) [2006] SGHC 121
A decree of divorce issued by the Syariah Court dissolves the entire marriage relationship between parties, including a marriage previously solemnized under the Women's Charter.
Chan Mei Lan Kristine v Ong Boon Huat Samuel [2006] SGHC 108
The court held that a property acquired during the marriage, even if one party did not contribute financially to it, constitutes a matrimonial asset under s 112(10) of the Women's Charter, unless it falls under the limited exception for gifts or inheritance.
Yap Bee Har v Chan Tai Hock Philip [2005] SGHC 99
In Yap Bee Har v Chan Tai Hock Philip [2005] SGHC 99, the High Court applied a broad-brush approach to matrimonial asset division, awarding the husband a 25% share of the wife's savings after finding his contributions to family expenses indirectly facilitated her ability to accumulate those funds.
Leong Choon Kum v Chia Kin Tuck [2005] SGHC 73
The court affirmed the division of matrimonial assets, applying a broad-brush approach under s 112 of the Women's Charter, and adjusted the wife's share in the matrimonial home and cash assets based on evidence of contributions.
Lim Kok Sian Brandon v Ong Ai Geok (alias Wang Aiyu) [2005] SGHC 51
The court determined the quantum of maintenance for a former wife by considering the wife's mental health (depressive disorder), the husband's high income, and the standard of living during the marriage, while applying the factors under s 114 of the Women's Charter.
AD v AE (minors: custody, care, control and access) [2005] SGHC 30
The court held that under s 92 of the Women's Charter, the court has jurisdiction to determine custody of children of the marriage regardless of biological paternity, rendering the conflict between DNA evidence and the s 114 Evidence Act presumption of paternity less critical in
Wong Ser Wan v Ng Cheong Ling [2005] SGHC 218
The court held that gifts made between spouses for the purpose of inducing a spouse to withdraw divorce proceedings and to provide financial security are irrevocable and should not be brought into the matrimonial pool for division upon divorce.
Lee Bee Kim Jennifer v Lim Yew Khang Cecil [2005] SGHC 209
This case clarifies that interim maintenance orders do not bind final ancillary relief decisions. The court emphasized the duty of full and frank disclosure, ruling that adverse inferences will be drawn against parties who fail to disclose their assets accurately.
Ng Kee Shee v Fu Gaofei [2005] SGHC 171
In Ng Kee Shee v Fu Gaofei [2005] SGHC 171, the High Court allowed the husband's appeal, granting leave to divorce within three years of marriage. The court ruled that the wife's unilateral abandonment constituted exceptional hardship, justifying an exception to the statutory restriction.
Li Kong v Cheng Lai Nar [2005] SGHC 164
The court held that an appellate court may interfere with findings of fact in ancillary matters where the decision is based on inferences drawn from documents rather than oral testimony. It also clarified the attribution of financial contributions to matrimonial assets in the abs