LITT
Try LITT free
CLI v CLJ
An applicant for leave to appeal must show that the question of importance has a material bearing on the outcome of the main hearing of the appeal.
VFU v VFV
A Syariah Court continuation certificate is not required for committal proceedings in the Family Court if the original civil proceedings (OSG 9/2017) had already concluded with a final order before the commencement of divorce proceedings in the Syariah Court.
TEN v TEO
The court affirmed joint custody but granted care and control to the father, emphasising that the best interests of the children required a period of no direct contact with the mother to allow for therapeutic recovery, while maintaining the father's obligation to facilitate futur
Raja Kannappan v Maanvili d/o Jaganathan [2011] SGHC 160
In Raja Kannappan v Maanvili d/o Jaganathan, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
AON v AOO [2011] SGHC 16
In AON v AOO, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
Choo Hwee Nee v Tan Puay Kern [2011] SGHC 158
In Choo Hwee Nee v Tan Puay Kern, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Matrimonial Assets, Family Law — Maintenance.
AMC v AMD [2011] SGHC 157
In AMC v AMD, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
AOH v AOI [2011] SGHC 14
In AOH v AOI, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
AQR v AQS [2011] SGHC 139
In AQR v AQS, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Divorce.
AQT v AQU [2011] SGHC 138
In AQT v AQU, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Divorce.
Ng Irene v Tan Meng Heng Robin [2011] SGHC 128
An offer to vary a court order remains open for acceptance until it is withdrawn or a reasonable time has elapsed, and the court will consider the circumstances to determine what constitutes a reasonable time.
AQN v AQO [2011] SGHC 127
In AQN v AQO, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Matrimonial assets.
AJE v AJF [2011] SGHC 115
Kan Ting Chiu J Counsel Name(s) : Foo Siew Fong and Cheong Yen Lin Adriene (Harry Elias Partnership LLP) for the Wife; Lim Teong Jin George SC and Tan Ai Ling Jinny (Wee, Tay & Lim LLP) for the Husband. Parties : AJE — AJF Family Law 9 May 2011 Judgment reserved. Kan Ting Chiu J: 1 These matters ori
URF & Anor v URH
The Family Division of the High Court does not have jurisdiction over independent civil claims (Inter Vivos Claims) that do not fall within the definition of 'family proceedings' under the Family Justice Act 2014.
AQB v AQC [2011] SGHC 101
In AQB v AQC, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
Nalini d/o Ramachandran v Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan [2010] SGHC 98
In Nalini d/o Ramachandran v Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Matrimonial assets.
Lim Slott v Wong Chiew Huong [2010] SGHC 91
In Lim Slott v Wong Chiew Huong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
TAU v TAT
The court held that shared care and control is not a legal presumption and must be determined based on the child's welfare, considering factors like parental co-operation and the child's developmental needs.
Dorey Donna Marie v Lee Kit Su (Lee Yee Wai Eva, Intervener) [2010] SGHC 57
The court held that the provision of funds for the purchase of a property by an intervener to the couple was a loan and not a gift, based on the absence of donative intent and the existence of a contemporaneous payment schedule.
UDF v UDG
The court refused to grant interim access orders for a father to see his teenage daughter in the US or to bring her to Singapore for summer vacation, prioritising the child's expressed wishes and her need for stability during a transition period in her education.
ZP v ZO [2010] SGHC 364
In ZP v ZO, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
TOW v TOV
A judge is not required to recuse himself from hearing a subsequent matter simply because he had made adverse findings against a party in an earlier related matter, provided that the judge did not express his views in such outspoken, extreme or unbalanced terms as to cast doubt o
Ho Kiang Fah v Eileen Toh Buan [2010] SGHC 337
In Ho Kiang Fah v Eileen Toh Buan, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
ACU v ACR [2010] SGHC 322
In ACU v ACR, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Appeals, Family Law — Custody.