LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Huang Rong Tai and Another [2003] SGCA 1

The Court of Appeal allowed the prosecution's appeal in Public Prosecutor v Huang Rong Tai [2003] SGCA 1, overturning the acquittal of two respondents. The Court ruled that the respondents' confessions, corroborated by forensic evidence, were reliable and sufficient to sustain a conviction.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Thongthot Yordsa-Art and Another v Public Prosecutor [2002] SGCA 33

In Thongthot Yordsa-Art and Another v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences, Evidence — Admissibility of evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Syed Abdul Mutalip bin Syed Sidek and Another v Public Prosecutor [2002] SGCA 27

In Syed Abdul Mutalip bin Syed Sidek and Another v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Evidence — Admissibility of evidence, Evidence — Weight of evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Tan Hock Keng v L and M Group Investments Ltd [2002] SGCA 22

In Tan Hock Keng v L and M Group Investments Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms, Evidence — Admissibility of evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Abdul Malik bin Abdul Jamil v Public Prosecutor [2002] SGCA 19

In Abdul Malik bin Abdul Jamil v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Evidence — Admissibility of evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Dr Lo Sook Ling Adela v Au Mei Yin Christina and Another [2002] SGCA 11

In Dr Lo Sook Ling Adela v Au Mei Yin Christina and Another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Appeals, Evidence — Admissibility of evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·10 min read
Singapore

Lee Hiok Tng (in her personal capacity) v Lee Hiok Tng and another (executors and trustees fo the estate of Lee Wee Nam, deceased) and Others [2001] SGCA 26

In Lee Hiok Tng (in her personal capacity) v Lee Hiok Tng and another (executors and trustees fo the estate of Lee Wee Nam, deceased) and Others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Res Judicata — Action against executors of estate for deceased's breaches of trust in

Sushant Shukla· ·10 min read
Singapore

Syed Yasser Arafat bin Shaik Mohamed v Public Prosecutor [2000] SGCA 46

In Syed Yasser Arafat bin Shaik Mohamed v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences, Evidence — Proof of evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Loganatha Venkatesan and Others v Public Prosecutor [2000] SGCA 42

In Loganatha Venkatesan and Others v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal, Evidence — Admissibility of evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Latham v Credit Suisse First Boston [2000] SGCA 26

In Latham v Credit Suisse First Boston, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Employment Law — Contract of service, Evidence — Admissibility of evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Def. Lex-O-Pedia
What is the Burden of Proof under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023?
The Burden of Proof under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 places the responsibility on the party asserting a fact to provide evidence supporting it. Sections 104-114 govern this obligation, ensuring fairness in legal proceedings by preventing baseless claims.
Read full entry