LITT
Try LITT free
FIVE HOLDING v ORIENT UNB TAKAFUL [2021] DIFC CFI 027 — Procedural alignment of jurisdiction and set-aside applications (11 April 2021)
The litigation arises from a default judgment issued on 14 March 2021 by H.E. Justice Nassir Al Nasser against the Defendant, Orient Unb Takaful PJSC. Following the entry of this judgment, the Defendant initiated two distinct procedural challenges: "Application 1," which seeks to set aside the…
FIVE HOLDING LIMITED v ORIENT UNB TAKAFUL PJSC [2021] DIFC CFI 027 — Default judgment for AED 25 million (14 March 2021)
The litigation involved a substantial financial claim brought by Five Holding Limited and Five Hotel Jumeirah Village LLC against Orient Unb Takaful PJSC. The claimants sought recovery of a specified sum of AED 25,000,000.
IDBI BANK LTD. v PRIME STAR ENERGY [2021] DIFC CFI 027 — Extension of time and alternative service via publication (16 March 2021)
The dispute arises from a banking claim initiated by IDBI Bank Ltd (DIFC Branch) against Prime Star Energy FZE and Hameed Syed Salahuddin. The Claimant faced significant procedural obstacles in effecting formal service of the Claim Form upon the Defendants, necessitating an application to the Court…
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2022] DIFC CFI 027/2018 — Procedural order regarding withdrawal of legal representation (24 June 2022)
The application filed by Clyde & Co LLP on 22 June 2022 was a procedural necessity to formally terminate the firm’s role as the legal representative for the Amira Parties in two complex, consolidated sets of proceedings.
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2021] DIFC CFI 027 — Discharge of security injunction following established indebtedness (20 December 2021)
The DIFC Court of First Instance confirms that once a claimant’s underlying indebtedness is judicially established, the Court will release security—specifically physical cheques—previously held under its control.
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2021] DIFC CFI 027/2018 — Procedural timeline for injunction discharge (26 October 2021)
The litigation involves a complex procedural battle between Amira C Foods International DMCC and A K Global Business FZE (the Claimants) and IDBI Bank Limited (the Defendant). The core of the current dispute concerns an application filed by IDBI Bank to discharge an injunction that has been in…
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2021] DIFC CFI 027/2018 — Consent Order regarding bank guarantee extension (16 March 2021)
The litigation involves a complex web of claims and cross-claims between Amira C Foods International DMCC, A K Global Business FZE, IDBI Bank Limited, and Karan A Chanana. At the heart of this specific procedural order is the preservation of security provided to the DIFC Courts’ Registry.
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2020] DIFC CFI 027 — Consent order regarding bank guarantee amendment (16 September 2020)
The dispute centers on the management of security provided by IDBI Bank Limited in favor of Amira C Foods International DMCC and A K Global Business FZE. Following a series of legal battles, including an appeal and related Part 8 proceedings, the parties reached a consensus to modify the existing…
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2020] DIFC CFI 027 — Post-judgment orders on security instruments, interest, and costs (22 January 2020)
The litigation centered on the Bank’s attempt to present security cheques provided by Amira C Foods International DMCC as collateral for credit facilities. Amira sought an injunction to restrain the Bank from presenting these instruments, arguing that no default had occurred under the facilities…
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2019] DIFC CFI 027 — Permission to appeal granted (11 December 2019)
Justice Roger Giles grants IDBI Bank Limited leave to appeal the Court of First Instance judgment dated 7 October 2019, setting the stage for appellate review of four specific grounds of challenge.
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL v IDBI BANK [2019] DIFC CFI 027 — Assessment of costs following unsuccessful applications (08 October 2019)
A procedural order quantifying the cost liability of the First Claimant following failed interlocutory applications in the DIFC Court of First Instance.
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDIB BANK [2019] DIFC CFI 027 — Dismissal of document production application (31 January 2019)
The dispute centered on an application filed by the First Claimant, Amira C Foods International DMCC, seeking a court-ordered production of documents from the Defendant, IDIB Bank Limited.
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2018] DIFC CFI 027 — Discovery and document production obligations (31 December 2018)
The litigation concerns a commercial dispute between the Claimants, Amira C Foods International DMCC and A K Global Business Fze, and the Defendant, IDBI Bank Limited, with Karan A Chanana joined as a Third Party.
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2018] DIFC CFI 027 — Case Management Order (01 November 2018)
This Case Management Order establishes the procedural roadmap for the litigation between Amira C Foods International DMCC, A K Global Business FZE, and IDBI Bank Limited, setting strict deadlines for document production, expert testimony, and trial preparation.
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2018] DIFC CFI 027 — Joinder of personal guarantor in banking facility dispute (12 September 2018)
The dispute centers on a banking facility arrangement between the Claimants, Amira C Foods International DMCC and A K Global Business FZE, and the Defendant, IDBI Bank Limited. Following a previous judgment on 13 May 2018, the bank sought to enforce its rights regarding alleged defaults under the…
AMIRA C FOODS INTERNATIONAL DMCC v IDBI BANK [2018] DIFC CFI 027 — Enforcing irrevocable payment undertakings and restraining security realization (16 May 2018)
The dispute centered on the failure of IDBI Bank Limited to honor an Irrevocable Letter issued to the Second Claimant, A K Global Business Fze. The Claimants, Amira C Foods International DMCC and A K Global, sought immediate payment of USD 4,134,000, arguing that the Bank’s obligation under the…
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v ALLEN AND OVERY [2018] DIFC CFI 027 — Consent order for discontinuance (13 August 2018)
The litigation involved a professional negligence or commercial dispute between Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank (ADIB) and the international law firm Allen and Overy. While the specific underlying facts regarding the nature of the legal advice or the specific transaction in question were not ventilated in a…
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v ALLEN AND OVERY [2018] DIFC CFI 027 — Dismissal of de novo review application (10 May 2018)
The dispute originated from an underlying claim, CFI 027/2017, involving Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank PJSC (the Claimant) and the international law firm Allen and Overy LLP (the Defendant).
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v ALLEN AND OVERY [2018] DIFC CFI 027 — Document production and Redfern Schedule compliance (20 March 2018)
The litigation involves a professional negligence claim brought by Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank (ADIB) against the international law firm Allen and Overy. The core of the current dispute concerns the scope of pre-trial discovery, specifically the exchange of documents necessary to substantiate the bank's…
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v ALLEN AND OVERY [2018] DIFC CFI 027 — Consent order for document production and confidentiality club (14 March 2018)
The litigation involves a dispute between Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank (ADIB) and the international law firm Allen and Overy. The core of the dispute centers on the production of sensitive materials that the parties agreed should be disclosed to facilitate the progression of the claim.
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v ALLEN & OVERY [2018] DIFC CFI 027 — Amended case management order by consent (04 February 2018)
The lawsuit involves a professional dispute between Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank (ADIB) and Allen & Overy, though the specific underlying causes of action remain shielded by the procedural nature of this order.
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v ALLEN & OVERY [2018] DIFC CFI 027 — Amended Case Management Order (14 January 2018)
The lawsuit involves a professional negligence claim brought by Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank PJSC against the international law firm Allen & Overy LLP. While the specific underlying facts of the professional engagement are not detailed in this procedural order, the litigation represents a significant…
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v ALLEN & OVERY [2017] DIFC CFI 027 — Case Management Order (28 December 2017)
The litigation involves a professional dispute between Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank PJSC (the Claimant) and the international law firm Allen & Overy LLP (the Defendant). While the specific underlying allegations of professional negligence or breach of contract are not detailed in this procedural order,…
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v ALLEN AND OVERY [2017] DIFC CFI 027 — Procedural extension for filing Particulars of Claim (01 August 2017)
The litigation involves a professional negligence claim brought by Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank PJSC against the international law firm Allen and Overy LLP. While the specific factual allegations regarding the scope of legal advice or the nature of the transaction remain confidential at this preliminary…