LITT
Try LITT free
SMIT LAMNALCO v AIROLINK INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — strict adherence to RDC service protocols (18 September 2022)
The dispute centers on the procedural threshold for effecting service of process upon a defendant within the DIFC jurisdiction. Smit Lamnalco Limited, acting as the Claimant, initiated proceedings against Airolink International Construction LLC under Claim No. CFI 029/2022.
SMIT LAMNALCO v AIROLINK INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Default judgment for unpaid construction invoices (31 August 2022)
The dispute centers on a claim for unpaid invoices arising from a commercial relationship between the claimant, Smit Lamnalco Limited, and the defendant, Airolink International Construction LLC.
PHENIX CONSULTING v ARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT [2021] DIFC CFI 029 — Settlement-driven discontinuance (23 March 2021)
The litigation involved Phenix Consulting FZE as the Claimant, initiating proceedings against three distinct Respondents: ARK Capital Management (Dubai) Limited, ARK Capital Limited, and Apex Fund Services (Dubai) Limited.
MS ALEXANDRA WILSON v SIMMONS & SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST [2021] DIFC CFI 029 — Consent order staying proceedings (03 March 2021)
The litigation initiated by Ms Alexandra Wilson against Simmons & Simmons Middle East LLP and Mr Syed Raza Abbas Rizvi involved a claim brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance.
MS ALEXANDRA WILSON v SIMMONS & SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST [2021] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural timeline adjustment via consent order (27 January 2021)
The litigation under case number CFI 029/2020 involves a claim brought by Ms Alexandra Wilson against Simmons & Simmons Middle East LLP and Mr Syed Raza Abbas Rizvi. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim are not detailed in this specific procedural order, the matter has reached the…
MS ALEXANDRA WILSON v SIMMONS & SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST [2021] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural framework for employment litigation (19 January 2021)
This Agreed Case Management Order establishes the comprehensive procedural roadmap for the employment dispute between Ms Alexandra Wilson and Simmons & Simmons Middle East, mandating psychiatric expert evidence and judicial mediation.
MS ALEXANDRA WILSON v SIMMONS & SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST [2021] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural amendment to case management timeline (13 January 2021)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Ms Alexandra Wilson against Simmons & Simmons Middle East LLP and Mr Syed Raza Abbas Rizvi. The dispute, filed under case number CFI 029/2020, reached a juncture where the parties sought to modify the existing procedural timeline established by the Court.
MS ALEXANDRA WILSON v SIMMONS & SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST [2020] DIFC CFI 029 — Judicial mediation procedural order (14 December 2020)
This order formalizes the framework for court-annexed mediation in an employment dispute, establishing strict protocols for virtual proceedings, confidentiality, and the mediator’s role.
MS ALEXANDRA WILSON v SIMMONS & SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST [2020] DIFC CFI 029 — Case management directions by consent (23 November 2020)
The lawsuit involves a claim brought by Ms Alexandra Wilson against Simmons & Simmons Middle East LLP and Mr Syed Raza Abbas Rizvi. While the specific quantum of the claim is not detailed in the initial case management order, the litigation centers on allegations of employment-related grievances…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Costs assessment following employment and tort litigation (30 October 2023)
The litigation involved a complex interplay between employment law claims and tortious allegations. Mr. Hamid, the former employee, initiated a counterclaim against The Industrial Group (TIG) seeking compensation for notice pay, end-of-service gratuity, accrued vacation, and statutory penalties…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Consent dismissal of costs assessment payment application (23 June 2023)
The dispute centered on the procedural funding required to initiate the formal assessment of legal costs following the underlying litigation in CFI 029/2018. The Defendant, Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid, had filed Application No.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural timeline extension for Consolidated Costs Assessment (26 May 2023)
The litigation between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a protracted affair involving multiple layers of procedural history, including substantive CFI proceedings and subsequent appellate review.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural extension for consolidated costs assessment (11 May 2023)
The litigation between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a protracted matter involving multiple stages of proceedings, including both the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Consolidation of costs assessment procedures (24 March 2023)
The dispute between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a long-standing fixture in the DIFC Courts, involving multiple procedural stages, including default judgment challenges and disclosure disputes.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Post-judgment interest and cost assessment guidance (10 March 2023)
The dispute centered on the Defendant’s entitlement to interest on a penalty sum of AED 244,640, which had been the subject of previous appellate proceedings. Following the Court of Appeal’s decision in CA-005-2022, which remitted the interest application to the trial judge, Justice Sir Richard…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v MR ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Consent order staying detailed assessment of costs (20 October 2022)
The litigation between The Industrial Group and Mr Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a protracted matter involving multiple procedural stages, including default judgment challenges and disclosure disputes.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Finalizing employment entitlements and stay of execution (04 August 2022)
This order marks the culmination of a protracted employment dispute, quantifying specific end-of-service entitlements while balancing the Claimant’s right to appeal against a significant penalty award.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Costs and interest allocation following employment and tort litigation (17 June 2022)
The litigation centered on a complex employment dispute involving allegations of embezzlement, dismissal with cause, and subsequent tort claims for abuse of process and malicious prosecution.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Conditional grant of permission to appeal tort claims (03 June 2022)
The litigation between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a protracted affair, involving multiple procedural stages. Following the Court’s judgment on 6 April 2022, which dismissed the Defendant’s counterclaims for malicious prosecution and abuse of process, the…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Retrospective extension for appeal notice filing (26 May 2022)
The dispute between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a protracted matter involving multiple procedural milestones, as evidenced by previous orders such as [THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2018] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural consolidation and…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural sanctions for late submissions and improper reply content (25 May 2022)
The dispute concerns the post-judgment phase of the litigation between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid. Following the issuance of judgment on the primary claims and counterclaims, the Court established a strict schedule for the parties to file their respective submissions…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural extension for costs submissions (21 April 2022)
The dispute in CFI 029/2018 concerns the final stages of litigation between The Industrial Group, acting as Claimant and Counterclaim Defendant, and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid, the Defendant and Counterclaim Claimant.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2018] DIFC CFI 029 — Unlawful termination and malicious prosecution (06 April 2022)
The dispute centered on the summary termination of Mr. Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid, the former VP of Finance and Planning at The Industrial Group (TIG). TIG, a specialty chemicals and food flavors group, summarily dismissed Mr.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2021] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural management of closing submissions (15 September 2021)
The litigation involves a high-stakes commercial dispute between The Industrial Group Ltd, acting as Claimant and Counterclaim Defendant, and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid, the Defendant and Counterclaim Claimant.