LITT
Try LITT free
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2024] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural refinement via consent order (01 April 2024)
The litigation involves a high-stakes banking dispute initiated by ICICI Bank Limited against Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. While the specific underlying commercial claims—often associated with complex debt recovery and financial obligations in the DIFC—are currently in the pre-trial phase, the matter…
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2024] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural recalibration of high-stakes banking litigation (23 February 2024)
The litigation involves a significant banking dispute between ICICI Bank Limited, acting as the Claimant, and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty, the Defendant. While the underlying merits of the claim remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the case represents a high-profile matter within the DIFC’s civil…
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2024] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural refinement of document production (05 February 2024)
The litigation between ICICI Bank Limited and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty concerns a substantial banking dispute currently navigating the DIFC Court of First Instance. The matter reached a juncture where the parties required an adjustment to the existing case management framework to facilitate the…
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2024] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural timetable amendment by consent (22 January 2024)
The litigation under case number CFI 034/2022 involves a high-stakes banking dispute between ICICI Bank Limited, acting as the Claimant, and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty, the Defendant.
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2023] DIFC CFI 034 — Case management order regarding forgery allegations (29 November 2023)
The litigation concerns the enforcement of personal guarantees allegedly executed by Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty to secure credit facilities provided to the NMC Group and Modular. The Claimant, the DIFC branch of ICICI Bank, seeks to recover substantial sums stemming from these facilities, which have…
CTB FINANCE v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural amendment of trial preparation deadlines (08 September 2023)
The litigation involves a Part 7 claim initiated by The CTB Finance Ltd against Dubai Insurance Co PSC, filed on 5 July 2022. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain confidential, the procedural history of the case indicates a complex preparation phase requiring multiple…
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2023] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural adjustment of the Reply deadline (11 August 2023)
The litigation involves a high-stakes banking dispute initiated by ICICI Bank Limited against Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. While the specific underlying causes of action are not detailed in this procedural order, the matter is categorized under the Banking sector within the DIFC Court of First…
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2023] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural adjustment of litigation timelines (13 July 2023)
The lawsuit concerns a significant banking dispute between ICICI Bank Limited and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. While the underlying merits of the claim remain subject to ongoing litigation, the immediate procedural focus of this application was the management of the exchange of pleadings.
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2023] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural timeline for Statement of Defence (23 May 2023)
The litigation involves a claim brought by ICICI Bank Limited against Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. While the substantive merits of the banking dispute remain to be fully ventilated in the pleadings, the matter reached a procedural milestone following the service of the Particulars of Claim on 19…
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2023] DIFC CFI 034 — procedural dismissal following withdrawal of service extension application (18 May 2023)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes the dismissal of a procedural application for an extension of time to serve process after the claimant voluntarily withdrew its request.
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2022] DIFC CFI 034 — Extension of time for service of claim form (14 November 2022)
The dispute concerns a civil claim initiated by ICICI Bank Limited against Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty, filed with the DIFC Court on 12 May 2022. While the underlying substantive merits of the banking claim remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the immediate procedural hurdle involved the Claimant’s…
ICICI BANK v BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY [2022] DIFC CFI 034 — Refusal of alternative service via email (11 October 2022)
The dispute arises from a claim initiated by ICICI Bank Limited against Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. Seeking to progress the litigation, the Claimant filed an Application Notice on 6 October 2022, requesting the Court’s permission to bypass standard international service protocols.
AL EATESAM MODERN MARKETING CO LTD v SEED MENA BUSINESSMEN SERVICES [2023] DIFC CFI 034 — Final assessment of legal costs (11 April 2023)
The dispute originated from the underlying proceedings in CFI 034/2021, where the Defendant, Seed Mena Businessmen Services LLC, successfully defended the claims brought by Al Eatesam Modern Marketing Co Ltd (Secutronic).
AL EATESAM MODERN MARKETING CO LTD v SEED MENA BUSINESSMEN SERVICES [2022] DIFC CFI 034 — Breach of contract and revenue target dispute (28 November 2022)
The dispute centered on a failed business collaboration between Al Eatesam Modern Marketing Co Ltd (trading as Secutronic) and Seed Mena Businessmen Services LLC (SEED). Secutronic, a Saudi-based physical security systems provider, entered into a series of agreements with SEED in late 2018 to…
AL EATESAM MODERN MARKETING CO LTD v SEED MENA BUSINESSMEN SERVICES [2022] DIFC CFI 034 — Admissibility of evidence and procedural streamlining (09 May 2022)
The dispute in CFI 034/2021 centers on the evidentiary foundation of the Claimant’s case against the Defendant, Seed Mena Businessmen Services LLC. The Claimant, Al Eatesam Modern Marketing Co Ltd (trading as Secutronic), sought to introduce specific documentary evidence to support its claims.
AL EATESAM MODERN MARKETING CO LTD v SEED MENA BUSINESSMEN SERVICES [2022] DIFC CFI 034 — Consent order revising trial scheduling and document filing deadlines (21 April 2022)
The litigation involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Al Eatesam Modern Marketing Co Ltd (trading as Secutronic), and the Defendant, Seed Mena Businessmen Services LLC. While the substantive merits of the claim remain pending, the procedural history of the case indicates a complex…
AL EATESAM MODERN MARKETING CO LTD v SEED MENA BUSINESSMEN SERVICES [2022] DIFC CFI 034 — Revision of Case Management Order (31 March 2022)
The lawsuit involves a commercial dispute between Al Eatesam Modern Marketing Co Ltd (trading as Secutronic) and Seed Mena Businessmen Services LLC. The matter reached a critical juncture during a Progress Monitoring Hearing, where the court addressed the claimant’s attempt to introduce additional…
AL-EATESAM MODERN MARKETING CO. v SEED MENA BUSINESS SERVICES [2021] DIFC CFI 034 — Denial of document production requests (26 October 2021)
The dispute centers on a procedural application for disclosure filed by the Defendant, Seed Mena Business Services LLC, against the Claimant, Al-Eatesam Modern Marketing Co. Ltd (trading as "Secutronic").
AL EATESAM MODERN MARKETING CO LTD v SEED MENA BUSINESSMEN SERVICES [2021] DIFC CFI 034 — Case management order defining trial issues (25 October 2021)
The litigation centers on a multi-faceted commercial relationship between Al Eatesam Modern Marketing Co Ltd (trading as Secutronic) and Seed Mena Businessmen Services LLC. The dispute involves competing claims regarding the performance of various agreements, including a Cooperation Agreement, a…
AL EATESAM MODERN MARKETING CO v SEED MENA BUSINESSMEN SERVICES [2021] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural adjustment via consent order (29 August 2021)
The lawsuit involves a commercial dispute between Al Eatesam Modern Marketing Co (trading as “Secutronic”) and Seed Mena Businessmen Services LLC. While the substantive merits of the underlying claim remain pending, the immediate procedural impasse concerned the preparation for the Case Management…
AL-EATESAM MODERN MARKETING CO v SEED MENA BUSINESSMEN SERVICES [2021] DIFC CFI 034 — Service by publication order (28 March 2021)
The lawsuit involves a claim initiated by Al-Eatesam Modern Marketing Co (trading as Secutronic) against Seed Mena Businessmen Services. The core of the dispute centers on the Claimant’s inability to effectuate service of the Claim Form through conventional means, necessitating an application for…
PRIYA HIRANANDANI-VANDREVALA v DARSHAN HIRANANDANI [2017] DIFC CFI 034 — Consent order discharging freezing injunction following foreign security deposit (01 February 2017)
The lawsuit centered on the Applicant’s efforts to enforce an arbitral award dated 18 May 2016 against the Respondent, Darshan Hiranandani. To protect the potential fruits of this enforcement, the Applicant secured a Freezing Order and a Provision of Information Order from the DIFC Court on 6…
DAVID LAWRENCE HAIGH v GFH CAPITAL [2015] DIFC CFI 034 — Strike out of employment and share transfer claims (14 May 2015)
The litigation centered on a dispute regarding employment benefits, specifically share transfers and bonus payments allegedly owed to the Claimant, David Lawrence Haigh. The Claimant asserted that he was entitled to shares under an agreement with the Defendants and sought damages for an alleged…
DAVID LAWRENCE HAIGH v GFH CAPITAL [2015] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural rejection of default judgment (18 January 2015)
David Lawrence Haigh initiated proceedings against GFH Capital Limited and Hisham Al Rayes under claim number CFI 034/2014. On 15 January 2015, the Claimant filed a formal request for a default judgment, asserting that the procedural conditions for such an order had been met.