LITT
Try LITT free
MASHREQBANK v INFINITE PARTNERS INVESTMENT [2021] DIFC CFI 063 — Lifting a stay of proceedings following the Court of Appeal’s clarification on jurisdictional disputes (22 September 2021)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the high threshold for staying proceedings in light of the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Lakhan v Lamia, rejecting attempts to rely on foreign bankruptcy orders and non-binding delegation letters.
MASHREQBANK v INFINITE PARTNERS INVESTMENT [2020] DIFC CFI 063 — Stay of proceedings pending Joint Judicial Committee review (09 December 2020)
The litigation involves a high-stakes claim brought by Mashreqbank PSC against a series of corporate and individual defendants, including Infinite Partners Investment LLC, Khaleefa Butti Omair Yousif Almuhairi, and His Excellency Saeed Mohamed Butti Mohamed Alqebaisi, alongside several related…
SKATTEFORVALTNINGEN v LA TRESORERIE LIMITED [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — Consent order for expanded document production (12 February 2024)
The dispute centers on the ongoing efforts of Skatteforvaltningen (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration) to secure comprehensive document production from LA Tresorerie Limited, a company currently in liquidation.
SKATTEFORVALTNINGEN v LA TRESORERIE [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — Consent order amending compliance deadlines (22 January 2024)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes a procedural extension for a defendant in liquidation, adjusting the timeline for compliance with prior judicial mandates.
SKATTEFORVALTNINGEN v LA TRESORERIE LIMITED [2023] DIFC CFI 062 — Consent order amending compliance deadlines (08 December 2023)
The dispute involves the Danish Customs and Tax Administration, known as Skatteforvaltningen, acting as the Claimant against La Tresorerie Limited, a company currently in liquidation.
SKATTEFORVALTNINGEN v LA TRESORERIE LIMITED [2023] DIFC CFI 062 — Consent order amending compliance deadlines (24 November 2023)
The litigation involves Skatteforvaltningen, the Danish Customs and Tax Administration, acting as the Claimant against LA Tresorerie Limited, a company currently in liquidation. While the specific underlying merits of the claim—often associated with complex cross-border tax recovery efforts—are not…
SKATTEFORVALTNINGEN v LA TRESORERIE [2023] DIFC CFI 062 — Consent order for compliance extension (15 November 2023)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Skatteforvaltningen, the Danish Customs and Tax Administration, against LA Tresorerie Limited, a company currently in liquidation. The dispute centers on the enforcement of obligations against the defendant, which has necessitated judicial intervention…
SKATTEFORVALTNINGEN v LA TRESORERIE [2023] DIFC CFI 062 — Consent order for compliance extension (30 October 2023)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Skatteforvaltningen, the Danish Customs and Tax Administration, against LA Tresorerie Limited, a company currently in liquidation. While the underlying merits of the claim remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the case centers on the enforcement of…
SKATTEFORVALTNINGEN v LA TRESORERIE LIMITED [2023] DIFC CFI 062 — Disclosure of documents in liquidation proceedings (11 October 2023)
The dispute centers on the Claimant’s, Skatteforvaltningen (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration), attempt to secure evidence held by the Defendant, LA Tresorerie Limited, which is currently in liquidation.
VISTA CAPITAL GOODS WHOLESALERS v FORTAUNSA B.V [2023] DIFC CFI 062 — Default judgment for breach of settlement agreement (02 May 2023)
The dispute arose from a breach of a settlement agreement executed on 20 December 2021 between the Claimant, Vista Capital Goods Wholesalers LLC, and the two Respondents, Fortaunsa B.V and Taunsa Agropecauira LTDA.
SANJEEV SAWHNEY v UBS AG [2026] DIFC CFI 062 — Regulatory disclosure and client classification disputes (24 February 2026)
The dispute arises from the Claimants’ contention that they were improperly classified as "Professional Clients" when opening an investment account with the Defendant (formerly Credit Suisse) in January 2012.
SANJEEV SAWHNEY v CREDIT SUISSE AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — Procedural refinement of document production timelines (25 July 2024)
The litigation between Sanjeev Sawhney and Alka Sawhney and the defendant, Credit Suisse AG, involves a complex discovery phase governed by the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC). The current procedural impasse centers on the parties' mutual desire to compel the production of documents from one…
Sanjeev Sawhney v Credit Suisse AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — Procedural variation of document production deadlines (12 June 2024)
The litigation between Sanjeev Sawhney, Alka Sawhney, and Credit Suisse AG involves complex disclosure requirements typical of high-value financial disputes within the DIFC. The parties reached a point where the existing deadlines set out in the Case Management Order (CMO) of 14 September 2023…
SANJEEV SAWHNEY v CREDIT SUISSE AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — procedural scheduling for RFI application (13 May 2024)
The litigation in CFI 062/2021 involves a claim brought by Sanjeev Sawhney and Alka Sawhney against Credit Suisse AG. While the underlying merits of the claim remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the immediate procedural focus concerns the Defendant’s Application No: CFI-062-2021/7.
Sanjeev Sawhney v Credit Suisse AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — Consent order on document production timelines (06 May 2024)
The litigation, registered under CFI 062/2021, involves Claimants Sanjeev Sawhney and Alka Sawhney against the Defendant, Credit Suisse AG. While the underlying substantive claims relate to the banking and finance sector, the current proceedings have focused heavily on the mechanics of disclosure…
Sanjeev Sawhney v Credit Suisse AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — Procedural variation of document production timelines (30 April 2024)
The litigation involves a complex dispute between the Claimants, Sanjeev and Alka Sawhney, and the Defendant, Credit Suisse AG. While the underlying substantive claims remain the subject of ongoing proceedings, the current procedural posture concerns the rigorous management of document production.
SANJEEV SAWHNEY v CREDIT SUISSE AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — Procedural variation of document production timelines (24 April 2024)
The litigation involves a complex dispute between the Claimants, Sanjeev and Alka Sawhney, and the Defendant, Credit Suisse AG. While the underlying merits of the claim remain the subject of the broader proceedings, the current procedural posture concerns the management of document production—a…
SANJEEV SAWHENY v CREDIT SUISSE AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — procedural variation of document production timelines (19 April 2024)
The litigation, registered under CFI 062/2021, involves a complex dispute between the Claimants, Sanjeev and Alka Sawheny, and the Defendant, Credit Suisse AG. While the underlying substantive claims remain the subject of ongoing proceedings, the current order addresses the mechanics of the…
Sanjeev Sawhney v Credit Suisse AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — Consent order regarding re-amended pleadings (02 April 2024)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Sanjeev Sawhney and Alka Sawhney against Credit Suisse AG. While the underlying merits of the dispute remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the current procedural posture concerns the Defendant’s request to re-amend its Amended Defence.
SANJEEV SAWHNEY v CREDIT SUISSE AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — Consent order for document production (02 February 2024)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Sanjeev and Alka Sawhney against Credit Suisse AG. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the current procedural focus has shifted toward the standard production of evidence.
SANJEEV SAWHNEY v CREDIT SUISSE AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — Procedural order regarding audio recording disclosure (23 January 2024)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Sanjeev Sawhney and Alka Sawhney against Credit Suisse AG. The dispute reached a procedural juncture concerning the scope and timing of document production, specifically regarding audio recordings held by the Defendant.
Sanjeev Sawhney v Credit Suisse AG [2024] DIFC CFI 062 — procedural recalibration of document production timelines (11 January 2024)
This consent order formalizes the fourth adjustment to the document production schedule in the ongoing litigation between Sanjeev and Alka Sawhney and Credit Suisse AG, reflecting the court's flexibility in managing complex banking disputes.
SANJEEV SAWHNEY v CREDIT SUISSE AG [2023] DIFC CFI 062 — procedural timeline adjustment for document production (29 November 2023)
The litigation between Sanjeev and Alka Sawhney and Credit Suisse AG involves complex document disclosure requirements typical of high-value financial disputes within the DIFC. The consent order dated 29 November 2023 was necessitated by the parties' mutual desire to adjust the timelines originally…
MR SANJEEV SAWHNEY (2) MRS ALKA SAWHNEY v CREDIT SUISSE AG [2023] DIFC CFI 062 — Procedural roadmap for complex banking litigation (14 September 2023)
This Case Management Order establishes the rigorous procedural timeline governing the high-stakes dispute between the Sawhneys and Credit Suisse AG, setting the stage for a multi-day trial.