LITT
Try LITT free
MAHESH SRICHAND TOURANI v DUSTI LALICHAND MEHTANI TOURANI [2018] DIFC CFI 007 — Procedural order for further information (05 April 2018)
The dispute in CFI 007/2018 centers on the Claimant, Mahesh Srichand Tourani, and his claims against the Respondents, Dusti Lalichand Mehtani Tourani and Duzty LLC. The core of the procedural conflict arose when the Defendants found the Claimant’s initial pleadings insufficient to properly prepare…
TRANSFERT v MINERAL TRADE GROUP [2017] DIFC CFI 007 — Consent order recording settlement of USD 3.9M claim (20 August 2017)
The lawsuit initiated by Transfert FZCO centered on a substantial commercial debt, with the claimant seeking recovery of USD 3,901,171.01. The dispute reached a resolution when the respondents, Mineral Trade Group FZE (MTG) and Affert Resources Pte Ltd (Affert), filed formal admissions of the…
SKY NEWS ARABIA FZ-LLC v KASSAB MEDIA FZ [2016] DIFC CFI 007 — Permission to appeal granted (03 August 2016)
The underlying litigation involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Sky News Arabia FZ-LLC, and the Defendant, Kassab Media FZ (LLC). Following an initial judgment delivered by H.E.
MOHAMMED SALEH ABDEL GHANI HIJAZI v LIBERTY HOUSE PRINCIPAL BODY CORPORATE [2015] DIFC CFI 007 — Order of Discontinuance (21 April 2015)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formally closed proceedings in CFI 007/2015 following the voluntary withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant and the subsequent settlement of all outstanding administrative liabilities.
MOHAMMED SALEH ABDEL GANI HIJAZI v LIBERTY HOUSE PRINCIPAL BODY CORPORATE [2015] DIFC CFI 007 — Consent order resolving an appeal from the Small Claims Tribunal (01 April 2015)
The litigation originated from a judgment delivered by the Small Claims Tribunal (SCT) on 23 February 2015, presided over by H.E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi. Following this initial determination, the Appellant, Mohammed Saleh Abdel Gani Hijazi, sought permission to appeal the SCT’s decision, which…
OMAR DOBOUNY v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2014] DIFC CFI 007 — Consent order for discontinuance (27 February 2014)
The litigation, registered under CFI 007/2013, involved a multi-party claim brought by Omar Dobouny, David Dobouny, Steven Ferrari, Ashley Fong, David Mickler, and Oberon Trading Limited against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited.
OMAR DOBOUNY v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2014] DIFC CFI 007 — Refusal of trial adjournment (19 February 2014)
The dispute in CFI 007/2013 involves a group of claimants—Omar Dobouny, David Dobouny, Steven Ferrari, Ashley Fong, David Mickler, and Oberon Trading Limited—seeking the recovery of payments made to Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited.
Omar Dobouny v Daman Real Estate Capital Partners [2013] DIFC CFI 007 — Disclosure Order (15 July 2013)
The litigation concerns a real estate dispute involving multiple claimants—Omar Dobouny, David Dobouny, Steven Ferrari, Ashley Fong, David Mickler, and Oberon Trading Limited—against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited.
OMAR DOBOUNY v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 007 — Case Management Order (23 May 2013)
The litigation involves a multi-party claim brought by Omar Dobouny, David Dobouny, Steven Ferrari, Ashley Fong, David Mickler, and Oberon Trading Limited against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited.
OMAR DOBOUNY v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 007 — Procedural timetable and case management (05 March 2013)
The lawsuit involves a multi-party claim brought by six claimants—Omar Dobouny, David Dobouny, Steven Ferrari, Ashley Fong, David Mickler, and Oberon Trading Limited—against the respondent, Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited.
SIRAJ CAPITAL (DUBAI) LIMITED [2012] DIFC CFI 007 — Stay of proceedings in insolvency winding-up (27 February 2012)
The lawsuit concerned the formal winding up of Siraj Capital (Dubai) Limited, a process initiated to address the company's insolvency. The court was petitioned to intervene in the corporate affairs of the entity, leading to the appointment of a liquidator to manage the company's remaining assets…
RICHARD WILLIAM WHEATLEY v SIMMONS AND COMPANY INTERNATIONAL [2013] DIFC CFI 007 — Costs award and indemnity basis shift (22 July 2013)
The dispute between Richard William Wheatley and Simmons and Company International has been a protracted matter involving complex employment entitlements. Following the substantive proceedings, the Claimant sought an order regarding the recovery of legal costs incurred throughout the litigation.
RICHARD WHEATLEY v SIMMONS & COMPANY INTERNATIONAL [2013] DIFC CFI 007 — Conditional stay of execution pending appeal (10 June 2013)
Chief Justice Michael Hwang grants permission to appeal an employment judgment while mandating the payment of US$ 223,864.20 into court to secure a stay of execution.
RICHARD WHEATLEY v SIMMONS AND COMPANY INTERNATIONAL [2013] DIFC CFI 007 — Post-judgment procedural amendments and deadline extensions (29 April 2013)
The dispute between Richard Wheatley and Simmons and Company International Limited reached a critical juncture following the delivery of the Court’s substantive judgment on 15 April 2013.
RICHARD WHEATLEY v SIMMONS & COMPANY INTERNATIONAL [2012] DIFC CFI 007 — Procedural order for change of legal representation (24 January 2012)
The lawsuit involves a claim brought by Richard Wheatley against Simmons & Company International, a matter that has required ongoing judicial oversight regarding the management of the legal record.
RICHARD WHEATLEY v SIMMONS & COMPANY INTERNATIONAL [2011] DIFC CFI 007 — Procedural compulsion of document disclosure (19 December 2011)
The dispute centers on the Claimant’s attempt to secure essential evidentiary material held by the Defendant, Simmons & Company International, which Richard Wheatley argued was necessary to substantiate his claims.
ELIENE SOUZA SHAW v ITAÚ MIDDLE EAST SECURITIES [2010] DIFC CFI 007 — Consent order concluding litigation (08 December 2010)
The litigation initiated by Eliene Souza Shaw against Itaú Middle East Securities on 14 March 2010 represented a formal legal challenge brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance.
ELIENE SOUZA SHAW v ITAU MIDDLE EAST SECURITIES [2010] DIFC CFI 007 — Consent order for procedural amendment (20 May 2010)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Eliene Souza Shaw against Itau Middle East Securities, a financial institution operating within the Dubai International Financial Centre. While the underlying substantive merits of the dispute remain confidential or subject to the evolving nature of the…
IBRAHIM SAAD v RASMALA INVESTMENTS [2009] DIFC CFI 007 — Procedural discipline in employment bonus disputes (22 November 2009)
The litigation centered on a breach of employment contract claim brought by Ibrahim Saad, the former Head of Private Equity at Rasmala Investments Limited. The Claimant sought to recover a performance bonus he alleged was contractually owed to him, supported by specific "Addendum emails." The…
MR IBRAHIM SAAD v RASMALA INVESTMENTS [2009] DIFC CFI 007 — Procedural management and amendment of pleadings (01 October 2009)
The lawsuit involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Mr Ibrahim Saad, and the Defendant, Rasmala Investments Limited. The matter reached a critical juncture in late 2009 when the parties engaged in a series of contested interlocutory applications.
IBRAHIM SAAD v RASMALA INVESTMENTS [2009] DIFC CFI 007 — Protecting investor confidentiality in private equity litigation (15 June 2009)
The lawsuit between Ibrahim Saad and Rasmala Investments Limited concerns a dispute arising from the management or operation of a Private Equity Fund. Given the sensitive nature of private equity structures, the disclosure of investor identities in public court filings poses significant commercial…
ANNA DADIC v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2011] DIFC CFI 007 — Imposition of an Extended Civil Restraint Order (21 July 2011)
The lawsuit concerns the culmination of protracted legal disputes initiated by the Claimant, Anna Dadic, against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority. Following the judgment delivered on 20 July 2011, the Court determined that the Claimant’s conduct necessitated the imposition of a…
ANNA DADIC v ORION HOLDING OVERSEAS [2010] DIFC CA 007 — Abuse of process and the limits of litigant-in-person cost claims (08 November 2010)
The Court of Appeal addresses the procedural exhaustion of a persistent litigant, confirming that qualified lawyers acting as litigants in person are not entitled to professional legal fees and that repeated, time-barred applications constitute an abuse of process.
ANNA DADIC v ORION HOLDING OVERSEAS [2010] DIFC CFI 007 — Dismissal of repetitive appeals regarding costs assessment (16 August 2010)
The litigation originated in 2008 as an employment claim brought by Anna Dadic, a former employee, against Orion Holding Overseas. The matter became heavily contested regarding the assessment of legal costs following a Part 32 Offer made by the Defendant in March 2009.