LITT
Try LITT free
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS LLC [2021] DIFC CFI 020 — procedural order regarding cessation of legal representation (10 May 2021)
The litigation between Tempo Events Management and Envie Events LLC - FZC, registered under case number CFI 020/2019, reached a procedural juncture regarding the status of the Claimant’s legal counsel.
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS LLC FZC [2021] DIFC CFI 020 — Conditional Order for Security for Costs (11 February 2021)
The dispute between Tempo Events Management and Envie Events LLC FZC involves a high-stakes commercial claim that has been subject to extensive procedural maneuvering. The Defendant, Envie Events LLC FZC, sought an order for security for costs to mitigate the financial risk associated with…
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS [2020] DIFC CFI 020 — Dismissal of permission to appeal security for costs order (12 November 2020)
Chief Justice Zaki Azmi denies the Appellant’s request to challenge a security for costs order, reinforcing the high threshold for appellate intervention in procedural matters.
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS LLC FZC [2020] DIFC CFI 020 — Dismissal of appeal against security for costs order (17 September 2020)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the high threshold for appealing case management decisions, confirming that security for costs orders are governed by the restrictive criteria of RDC 44.27 rather than the general permission to appeal test under RDC 44.19.
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS [2020] DIFC CFI 020 — Quashing a Judicial Officer’s document production order (29 June 2020)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the threshold for document production, emphasizing that broad, non-specific requests fail to satisfy the requirements of RDC 28.1.
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS LLC FZC [2020] DIFC CFI 020 — Order for Redfern Schedule disclosure (08 June 2020)
The lawsuit involves a commercial dispute between Tempo Events Management and Envie Events LLC FZC, which reached a procedural juncture regarding the scope of discovery. Following a Case Management Conference (CMC) order issued earlier in the proceedings, the Claimant sought to compel the…
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS [2020] DIFC CFI 020 — Judicial Officer order on Redfern schedule disclosure (19 May 2020)
The dispute in CFI 020/2019 centers on the scope of document disclosure required during the pre-trial phase of litigation between the Claimant, Tempo Events Management, and the Defendant, Envie Events.
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS LLC - FZ [2020] DIFC CFI 020 — Case Management Order (05 March 2020)
The lawsuit involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Tempo Events Management, and the Defendant, Envie Events LLC - FZ. While the specific underlying contractual or tortious claims are not detailed in this procedural order, the litigation has reached the stage of active case management,…
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS LLC FZC [2020] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural directions for security for costs (26 February 2020)
The litigation involves a commercial dispute between Tempo Events Management (the Claimant) and Envie Events LLC FZC (the Defendant). While the underlying substantive claims remain to be fully ventilated, the immediate procedural focus concerns the Defendant’s application filed on 23 February 2020,…
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS LLC FZC [2019] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural directions for amended pleadings (22 December 2019)
The lawsuit involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Tempo Events Management, and the Defendant, Envie Events LLC FZC. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain to be fully ventilated, the current stage of the proceedings focuses on the formalization of the parties'…
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS LLC [2019] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural mootness of time extension applications (17 September 2019)
The dispute between Tempo Events Management and Envie Events LLC - FZ centers on a procedural application filed by the Defendant, Envie Events LLC - FZ, seeking to extend the deadline for the submission of its Defence and Counterclaim. The original deadline for these filings was 2 September 2019.
TEMPO EVENTS MANAGEMENT v ENVIE EVENTS LLC [2019] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural mootness in time extension applications (17 September 2019)
The dispute between Tempo Events Management and Envie Events LLC-FZ centers on the procedural timeline for the exchange of pleadings within the DIFC Court of First Instance. On 5 September 2019, the Defendant, Envie Events LLC-FZ, initiated an application (CFI 020-2019/1) seeking a formal extension…
MOHAMMAD WAFIK TAWFIK AS’AD v FIELDS INVESTMENT [2018] DIFC CFI 020 — Discontinuance of claims by consent (29 July 2018)
A definitive resolution of the dispute between Mohammad Wafik Tawfik As’ad and Fields Investment (DIFC) Limited through a court-sanctioned consent order, effectively terminating all active litigation and counterclaims.
VTJ v Mohd Ammar Al Hassan [2018] DIFC CFI 020 — Permission to appeal granted (17 July 2018)
The litigation between VTJ Limited and Mohd Ammar Al Hassan originated as a claim filed under case number CFI-020-2017. While the specific underlying commercial merits of the dispute were not detailed in the July 2018 order, the procedural history indicates a contested judgment delivered by H.E.
VTJ Limited v Mohd Ammar Al Hassan [2017] DIFC CFI 020 — Dismissal of claims due to evidentiary failure (30 May 2018)
The litigation centered on a contested real estate transaction involving a property unit located within the DIFC. The Claimant, VTJ Limited, sought to enforce an MOU allegedly executed in 2012, which purportedly established a payment schedule for the acquisition of the unit from the Defendant.
VTJ v MOHD AMMAR AL HASSAN [2018] DIFC CFI 020 — Dismissal of non-party disclosure application (02 May 2018)
In the matter of CFI-020-2017, the Claimant, VTJ Limited, initiated a formal request for judicial intervention regarding the production of evidence. Specifically, the Claimant filed an Application Notice, identified as CFI-020-2017/2, on 25 April 2018.
BROOKFIELD MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2017] DIFC CFI 020 — Consent order extending stay of proceedings (13 February 2017)
This order formalizes the continued suspension of litigation between Brookfield Multiplex Constructions and the DIFC entities, maintaining the status quo established in previous consent orders until 30 March 2017.
BROOKFIELD MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2017] DIFC CFI 020 — Extension of stay of proceedings (15 January 2017)
The litigation involves a construction dispute between Brookfield Multiplex Constructions LLC and the respondents, DIFC Investments LLC and the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority.
BROOKFIELD MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2016] DIFC CFI 020 — Consent order staying proceedings (04 August 2016)
The litigation involved a construction-related dispute between the Claimant, Brookfield Multiplex Constructions LLC, and the Respondents, DIFC Investments LLC and the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority.
BROOKFIELD MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2016] DIFC CFI 020 — Anti-suit injunctions and the preservation of evidence (28 July 2016)
The dispute arose from a construction contract for "The Gate" building, which contained an arbitration clause requiring disputes to be submitted to arbitration in the Emirate of Dubai. Brookfield sought an anti-suit injunction to restrain the respondents from pursuing Lawsuit No.
BROOKFIELD MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2016] DIFC CFI 020 — Anti-suit injunctions and arbitration primacy (30 June 2016)
The dispute arose from a long-standing construction contract executed on 22 May 2003. Brookfield Multiplex Constructions LLC (the Claimant) sought an urgent interim injunction to restrain the Respondents, DIFC Investments LLC and the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority, from continuing…
MOHAMMAD BIN HAMAD BIN ABDUL-KARIM AL-MOJIL v PROTIVITI MEMBER FIRM [2018] DIFC CFI 020 — Consent order for discontinuance (05 November 2018)
The litigation identified as CFI 020/2015 involved two claimants, Mohammad Bin Hamad Bin Abdul-Karim Al-Mojil and Adel Bin Mohammad Bin Hamad Al-Mojil, who initiated proceedings against the defendant, Protiviti Member Firm (Middle East) Limited.
MOHAMMAD BIN HAMAD BIN ABDUL-KARIM AL-MOJIL v PROTIVITI MEMBER FIRM [2018] DIFC CFI 020 — Consent order for stay and release of security (07 May 2018)
The claimants, Mohammad Bin Hamad Bin Abdul-Karim Al-Mojil and Adel Bin Mohammad Bin Hamad Al-Mojil, initiated proceedings against Protiviti Member Firm (Middle East) Limited under claim number CFI-020-2015.
MOHAMMAD BIN HAMAD BIN ABDUL-KARIM AL-MOJIL v PROTIVITI MEMBER FIRM [2018] DIFC CFI 020 — Case management order for complex expert evidence and trial preparation (07 February 2018)
The lawsuit involves claims brought by Mohammad Bin Hamad Bin Abdul-Karim Al-Mojil and Adel Bin Mohammad Bin Hamad Al-Mojil against Protiviti Member Firm (Middle East) Limited. The dispute centers on professional services rendered by the defendant, specifically regarding a report provided to the…