LITT
Try LITT free
Dao Thi Boi v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 290
In Dao Thi Boi v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences ; Criminal Law — Elements of crime, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Fan Lei v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 278
In Fan Lei v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing, Criminal Law — Statutory offences.
JCY v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 267
In JCY v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph (in his personal capacity and in his capacity as administrator of the estate of Salvin Foster Steven, the deceased) and another [2024] SGHC 26
The sentencing framework in Melvin Tan for fraudulent evasion of GST under s 128D of the Customs Act is extended to apply to offences concerning the fraudulent evasion of excise duty on imported goods, where no harmful goods are involved.
Adri Satryawan Pratama v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 258
In Adri Satryawan Pratama v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Road Traffic Act, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v S Iswaran [2024] SGHC 251
In Public Prosecutor v S Iswaran, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory Offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v DAN [2024] SGHC 250
In Public Prosecutor v DAN, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v Adam bin Mohamed Noor [2024] SGHC 25
In Public Prosecutor v Adam bin Mohamed Noor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal.
Public Prosecutor v Muhamad Akashah Aizad bin Hasni [2024] SGHC 223
In Public Prosecutor v Muhamad Akashah Aizad bin Hasni, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Ang Boon Han v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 221
In Ang Boon Han v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Muhamad Zulhilmi bin Mohamad Sapari v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 209
In Muhamad Zulhilmi bin Mohamad Sapari v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Ng Nicholas v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 2
The sentencing framework in Melvin Tan for fraudulent evasion of GST under s 128D of the Customs Act is extended to apply to offences involving the fraudulent evasion of excise duty under the same section, provided no harmful goods are involved.
Public Prosecutor v JCS [2024] SGHC 172
In Public Prosecutor v JCS, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v CRX [2024] SGHC 162
In Public Prosecutor v CRX, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing, Criminal Law — Offences.
Muhammad Nurashik bin Mohd Nasir v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 161
In Muhammad Nurashik bin Mohd Nasir v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal.
Public Prosecutor v Iskandar bin Jinan and another [2024] SGHC 134
In Public Prosecutor v Iskandar bin Jinan [2024] SGHC 134, the High Court sentenced two repeat drug offenders to 32 and 31 years' imprisonment. The judgment clarifies sentencing frameworks for repeat offenders, emphasizing the totality principle and the application of consecutive sentences under the
Chen Song v Public Prosecutor and other appeals [2024] SGHC 129
The court held that the categories of harm in s 65 of the Road Traffic Act are discrete and mutually exclusive, and that the Prosecution has no discretion to reduce charges by invoking a punishment provision for a lower category of harm than that disclosed by the facts.
Public Prosecutor v CPS [2024] SGCA 59
Rehabilitation is not the predominant sentencing consideration for young offenders who commit serious offences like rape, especially when aggravating factors such as victim vulnerability, group elements, and recalcitrance are present.
Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGCA 56
The Court of Appeal dismissed Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad’s application for a Post-Appeal Criminal Case (PACC) review, ruling the request lacked merit and was a tactical delay. The Court affirmed the death sentence, emphasizing that re-litigating settled issues without new, admissible evidence is futi
Iskandar bin Jinan v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2024] SGCA 55
The Court of Appeal calibrated the Sentencing Advisory Panel's PG Guidelines for drug trafficking and importation offences, establishing a maximum sentence reduction of 10% for guilty pleas, with a maximum of 5% for subsequent stages, while affirming that the guidelines are non-b
Public Prosecutor v Xu Yuanchen [2024] SGCA 45
In Public Prosecutor v Xu Yuanchen, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Criminal references, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
CNK v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGCA 42
The court held that while a mental disorder may attenuate culpability, it does not act as a blanket excuse, especially where the offender retains rationality and premeditation. Retribution and deterrence remain dominant principles for heinous offences.
Sulaiman bin Jumari v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGCA 40
The Court of Appeal held that a criminal motion seeking a stay of execution based on an ongoing civil proceeding challenging the constitutionality of the PACC procedure is without merit where the applicant has no new material to challenge the conviction and sentence.
Pausi bin Jefridin v Public Prosecutor and other matters [2024] SGCA 37
The Court of Appeal dismissed several criminal motions brought by prisoners awaiting capital punishment, holding that the disclosure of their correspondence to the Attorney-General's Chambers after their convictions and appeals had concluded could not have affected the integrity