LITT
Try LITT free
Ooi Ching Ling v Just Gems Inc (No 2) [2002] SGCA 43
In Ooi Ching Ling v Just Gems Inc (No 2), the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Breach, Contract — Consideration.
Tan Hock Keng v L and M Group Investments Ltd [2002] SGCA 22
In Tan Hock Keng v L and M Group Investments Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms, Evidence — Admissibility of evidence.
Samwoh Asphalt Premix Pte Ltd v Sum Cheong Piling Private Limited and Another [2001] SGCA 79
The Court of Appeal allowed Samwoh's appeal, setting aside the lower court's order and restoring an injunction against the call on a performance guarantee. The court ruled that SC Piling's call was unconscionable, ordering the repayment of S$500,000 plus interest to restore the parties' positions.
Wu Fu Ping and Another v Ong Beng Seng and Others [2001] SGCA 6
In Wu Fu Ping and Another v Ong Beng Seng and Others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms.
Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1933 v Liang Huat Aluminium Ltd [2001] SGCA 41
In Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1933 v Liang Huat Aluminium Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms, Credit and Security — Guarantees and indemnities.
Projection Pte Ltd v The Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] SGCA 28
Case Details * Citation: [2001] SGCA 28 * Case Number: CA 110/2000 * Decision Date: 19 April 2001 * Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore * Coram: Chao Hick Tin JA; L P Thean JA; Yong
Everbright Commercial Enterprises Pte Ltd v AXA Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd [2001] SGCA 24
In Everbright Commercial Enterprises Pte Ltd v AXA Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Formation, Equity — Estoppel.
Pacific Century Regional Development Ltd v Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd [2001] SGCA 21
The Court of Appeal allowed Pacific Century Regional Development Ltd's appeal, setting aside the lower court's judgment against it. The court dismissed Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd's claim, ruling that the relief sought for an alleged breach of clause 11(E) was legally misconceived.
Hiap Hong & Co Pte Ltd v Hong Huat Development Co (Pte) Ltd [2001] SGCA 17
In Hiap Hong & Co Pte Ltd v Hong Huat Development Co (Pte) Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Implied contracts, Professions — Architects.
PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction (S) Pte Ltd [2000] SGCA 65
In PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction (S) Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Remedies.
Societe Generale v Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd [2000] SGCA 61
In Societe Generale v Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms.
Capital Realty Pte Ltd v Chip Thye Enterprises (Pte) Ltd [2000] SGCA 58
In Capital Realty Pte Ltd v Chip Thye Enterprises (Pte) Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Privity of contract.
Lee Siong Kee v Beng Tiong Trading, Import and Export (1988) Pte Ltd [2000] SGCA 57
In Lee Siong Kee v Beng Tiong Trading, Import and Export (1988) Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Equity — Estoppel, Contract — Breach.
Miller Freeman Exhibitions Pte Ltd v Singapore Industrial Automation Association and Another [2000] SGCA 50
Case Details * Citation: [2000] SGCA 50 * Case Number: CA 211/1999 * Decision Date: 15 September 2000 * Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore * Coram: Chao Hick Tin JA; L P Thean JA; Yong
Zarkovic Stanko v Owners of the Ship or Vessel `MARA` [2000] SGCA 47
In Zarkovic Stanko v Owners of the Ship or Vessel `MARA`, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Admiralty and Shipping — Admiralty jurisdiction and arrest, Contract — Contractual terms.
Bonsel Development Pte Ltd v Tan Kong Kar and Another [2000] SGCA 45
In Bonsel Development Pte Ltd v Tan Kong Kar and Another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms.
Friis and Another v Casetech Trading Pte Ltd and Others [2000] SGCA 35
In Friis and Another v Casetech Trading Pte Ltd and Others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms, Contract — Discharge.
Chua Chay Lee and Others v Premier Properties Pte Ltd [2000] SGCA 34
In Chua Chay Lee and Others v Premier Properties Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Breach.
The "Epic" [2000] SGCA 28
Analysis of [2000] SGCA 28, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2000-06-27.
Gn Muey Muey v Goh Poh Choo [2000] SGCA 20
In Gn Muey Muey v Goh Poh Choo [2000] SGCA 20, the Court of Appeal upheld the validity of a land sale contract, ruling that minor drafting errors and the absence of standard conditions do not invalidate an agreement if essential terms like property identity and price are ascertainable.
National Aerated Water Co Pte Ltd v Monarch Co, Inc [2000] SGCA 2
In National Aerated Water Co Pte Ltd v Monarch Co, Inc, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms, Damages — Compensation and damages.
Hong Huat Development Co (Pte) Ltd v Hiap Hong & Co Pte Ltd [2000] SGCA 14
In Hong Huat Development Co v Hiap Hong & Co [2000] SGCA 14, the Court of Appeal clarified that an arbitrator's delay does not constitute misconduct sufficient to set aside an award. The court emphasized that parties must pursue formal appeal procedures rather than collateral challenges.
Parfums Rochas SA and Others v Davidson Singapore Pte Ltd and Another [2000] SGCA 11
In Parfums Rochas SA and Others v Davidson Singapore Pte Ltd and Another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Discharge, Damages — Assessment.
IHC Pte Ltd v Mustafa Ali Jumabhoy [2000] SGCA 10
In IHC Pte Ltd v Mustafa Ali Jumabhoy [2000] SGCA 10, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, holding that the respondent's claim for recovery of shares was barred by a prior agreement to contribute those shares for capitalisation, which would be breached by their return.