LITT
Try LITT free
Lonpac Insurance Bhd v American Home Assurance Co [2011] SGHC 257
The High Court allowed Lonpac's appeal, ruling that the parol evidence rule under section 94 of the Evidence Act does not apply to third parties. The case was remitted for re-hearing to allow for the admission of extrinsic evidence to clarify the insurance policy's scope.
MovingU Pte Ltd v Trans-Cab Services Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 254
In MovingU Pte Ltd v Trans-Cab Services Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract.
United Fiber System Limited v China National Machinery & Equipment Import & Export Corporation [2011] SGHC 25
In United Fiber System Limited v China National Machinery & Equipment Import & Export Corporation, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract, Companies.
OMG Holdings Pte Ltd v Pos Ad Sdn Bhd [2011] SGHC 246
Case Details * Citation: [2011] SGHC 246 * Case Number: Suit No 253 of 2009 * Decision Date: 17 November 2011 * Court: High Court of Singapore * Coram: Andrew Ang J * Judgment Delivered By: Andrew Ang
Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 241
In Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Illegality and Public Policy.
Liang and Sons Holdings (S) Pte Ltd v Chan Ah Beng [2011] SGHC 236
In Liang and Sons Holdings (S) Pte Ltd v Chan Ah Beng, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Breach.
Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 226
In Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract.
Tan Holdings Pte Ltd (in creditor's voluntary liquidation) v Prosperity Steel (Asia) Co Ltd and others [2011] SGHC 219
In Tan Holdings Pte Ltd (in creditor's voluntary liquidation) v Prosperity Steel (Asia) Co Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Courts and jurisdiction — court judgments, Contract — contractual terms.
SKK (S) Pte Ltd v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1166 [2011] SGHC 215
In SKK (S) Pte Ltd v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1166, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — breach.
Sincastle Enterprises Pte Ltd v Sulzer Chemtech Pty Ltd (formerly known as Towertech Pty Ltd) and another [2011] SGHC 206
In Sincastle Enterprises Pte Ltd v Sulzer Chemtech Pty Ltd (formerly known as Towertech Pty Ltd) and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms.
Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 204
The High Court ruled in favor of Sheng Siong, ordering the return of security deposits and legal fees after a tenancy agreement was frustrated by HDB's refusal to approve the premises' use. The court applied the Frustrated Contracts Act to adjust for expenses incurred by the defendant.
Peck Wee Boon Patrick and another v Lim Poh Goon and others [2024] SGHC 44
In Peck Wee Boon Patrick and another v Lim Poh Goon and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Incorporation of companies, Contract — Breach.
Kim Eng Securities Pte Ltd v Goh Teng Poh Karen [2011] SGHC 201
In Kim Eng Securities Pte Ltd v Goh Teng Poh Karen, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract.
Morten Innhaug v Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd and others [2011] SGHC 20
In Morten Innhaug v Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd [2011] SGHC 20, the High Court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, ruling that the dispute must be resolved via SIAC arbitration. The court emphasized strict adherence to arbitration clauses, even when internal management disputes overlap with operational dutie
Ong Kok Ming (alias Ong Henardi) v Happy Valley Holdings Pte Ltd and another [2011] SGHC 199
In Ong Kok Ming v Happy Valley Holdings, the High Court ruled that a binding land sale contract existed despite the lack of a formal option. The court awarded the plaintiff $1m in damages, representing the difference between the contract price and the property's market value at the time of breach.
Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong and others (Yeo Boon Hwa, third party) [2011] SGHC 18
In Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong and others (Yeo Boon Hwa, third party), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure, Contract.
Baumann Xiaoyan v Tong Lian Joo and another [2011] SGHC 178
In Baumann Xiaoyan v Tong Lian Joo and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract.
Sentosa Development Corp v Sentosa Tiger Island Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 168
In Sentosa Development Corp v Sentosa Tiger Island Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Summary judgment, Contract — Contractual terms.
Chew Nam Fong Ronny v Continental Chemical Corp Pte Ltd and another [2011] SGHC 166
The High Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for severance and bonuses, ruling that the employer was justified in terminating the employee for poor performance. The court affirmed management's prerogative to set targets and awarded the defendant indemnity costs following a rejected settlement offe
Robert Bosch GmbH and another v YSH Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 148
In Robert Bosch GmbH and another v YSH Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Civil Procedure.
SetClear Pte Ltd and others v Ashlock William Grover [2011] SGHC 130
In SetClear Pte Ltd and others v Ashlock William Grover, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract, Conflict of Laws.
ABN AMRO Bank NV, Singapore Branch v CWT Commodities (SEA) Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 13
In ABN AMRO Bank NV, Singapore Branch v CWT Commodities (SEA) Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract.
Smartbus Pte Ltd v Yeap Transport Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 129
In Smartbus Pte Ltd v Yeap Transport Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 129, the High Court dismissed the claim for 40 CNG buses due to lack of proof but awarded the plaintiff $79,820 for the outstanding balance of two buses, emphasizing the need for clear evidence in commercial contract disputes.
The Stansfield Group Pte Ltd (trading as Stansfield College and another v Consumers' Association of Singapore and another [2011] SGHC 122
The High Court dismissed claims against CASE and awarded only nominal damages of $100 against NTUC Income. The ruling clarifies that contractual rights are not subject to implied duties of good faith, emphasizing strict contract construction and the necessity of proving actual loss.