LITT
Try LITT free
Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 274
The court held that the defendant was not in breach of contract or duty of care in booking funds into the plaintiff's account within 3 minutes and 38 seconds of notification, as the contract expressly allowed up to one business day for such processing.
Mitfam International Ltd v Motley Resources Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 270
The court held that the defendant failed to prove that payments made were advances for goods, finding instead they were reimbursements for payments made by the plaintiff on the defendant's behalf. The defendant's ledger was held inadmissible for failing to meet the requirements o
Chua Kwee Sin v Venerable Sek Meow Di (Tang Kheng Tiong, third party) [2013] SGHC 265
In Chua Kwee Sin v Venerable Sek Meow Di (Tang Kheng Tiong, third party), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Collateral Contracts, Tort — Misrepresentation.
Leong Eva v Loo Yek Hwee Robin and another [2013] SGHC 241
In Leong Eva v Loo Yek Hwee Robin and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of contract — breach.
Official Assignee of the estate of Tay Teng Tiang William, a bankrupt v Tay Lee Kiang Liza and others [2013] SGHC 239
In Official Assignee of the estate of Tay Teng Tiang William, a bankrupt v Tay Lee Kiang Liza and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Misrepresentation, Tort — Misrepresentation.
Drydocks World LLC (formerly known as Dubai Drydocks World LLC) v Tan Boy Tee
The court dismissed an Originating Summons and an application to convert it to a writ action, finding that the plaintiff's allegations were based on inadmissible hearsay and that the discovery process should not be used to 'fish' for a cause of action.
Gimpex Ltd v Unity Holding Business Ltd and others [2013] SGHC 224
In Gimpex Ltd v Unity Holding Business Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract.
Bridgeman Pte Ltd v Dukim International Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 220
In Bridgeman Pte Ltd v Dukim International Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 220, the High Court allowed both the plaintiff’s claim for payment and the defendant’s counterclaim for breach of contract, ordering a set-off of damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
Stone World Sdn Bhd v Engareh (S) Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 22
In Stone World Sdn Bhd v Engareh (S) Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Formation.
Intrading Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2013] SGHC 219
In Intrading Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual Terms, Contract — Breach.
Chai Kwok Seng Anthony v CCM Group Limited [2013] SGHC 208
In Chai Kwok Seng Anthony v CCM Group Limited, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual Terms.
Belfield International (Hong Kong) Ltd v Sheagar s/o T M Veloo [2013] SGHC 206
The Singapore High Court ruled in favor of Belfield International, holding that isolated interest-bearing loans during the 2008 financial crisis did not constitute a 'business of moneylending.' The defendant was ordered to pay the outstanding debt, and the counterclaim was dismissed.
Biomedia Pharma Pte Ltd (formerly known as Malaysia Chemist Pte Ltd) v TAC Distribution Pte Ltd (trading as Trane Singapore) (Amcrotech Pte Ltd, third party) [2013] SGHC 2
In Biomedia Pharma Pte Ltd (formerly known as Malaysia Chemist Pte Ltd) v TAC Distribution Pte Ltd (trading as Trane Singapore) (Amcrotech Pte Ltd, third party), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Remedies.
Rudhra Minerals Pte Ltd v MRI Trading Pte Ltd (formerly known as CWT Integrated Services Pte Ltd) [2013] SGHC 187
In Rudhra Minerals Pte Ltd v MRI Trading Pte Ltd (formerly known as CWT Integrated Services Pte Ltd), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Formation, Contract — Intention to create legal relations.
Boon Lay Choo and another v Ting Siew May [2013] SGHC 175
In Boon Lay Choo and another v Ting Siew May, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Illegality and Public Policy, Land — Sale of Land.
Olivine Capital Pte Ltd and another v Lee Chiew Leong and another [2013] SGHC 168
In Olivine Capital Pte Ltd and another v Lee Chiew Leong and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Summary judgment, Contract — Interpretation.
Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd v Ong Boon Lin Lester [2013] SGHC 163
In Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd v Ong Boon Lin Lester, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — illegality and public policy, Statutory Interpretation — definitions.
Yeoh Wee Liat v Wong Lock Chee and another suit [2013] SGHC 153
In Yeoh Wee Liat v Wong Lock Chee and another suit, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract.
Chan Tuck Cheong v Sin Wee Hiong [2026] SGHC 1
In Chan Tuck Cheong v Sin Wee Hiong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Intention to create legal relations.
Aero-Gate Pte Ltd v Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 148
In Aero-Gate Pte Ltd v Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Breach, Contract — Waiver.
Lateral Capital Group Pte Ltd v ChemOne Holdings Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 143
In Lateral Capital Group Pte Ltd v ChemOne Holdings Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract.
Ong Hong Kiat v RIQ Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 131
In Ong Hong Kiat v RIQ Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Formation, Contract — Discharge.
Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd v Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 127
In Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd v Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Frustration.
Chew Ai Hua, Sandra v Woo Kah Wai and another (Chesney Real Estate Pte Ltd, third party) [2013] SGHC 120
The High Court allowed the Plaintiff's claim for damages following a failed property transaction, ordering the return of $9,200 in option money and an assessment of damages based on market value. The court dismissed claims for alternative accommodation costs, citing a lack of net loss.