LITT
Try LITT free
Ong & Ong Pte Ltd v Fairview Developments Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 5
In Ong & Ong Pte Ltd v Fairview Developments Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Offer to settle, Contract — Formation.
WANG PIAO V LEE WEE CHING
A claimant establishes a prima facie case for summary judgment by producing a signed loan agreement, and the defendant must then show a real or bona fide defence to avoid summary judgment.
ANB v ANC and another and another matter [2015] SGCA 43
In ANB v ANC and another and another matter, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Injunctions, Tort — Confidence.
The "STX Mumbai" and another matter [2015] SGCA 35
Analysis of [2015] SGCA 35, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2015-07-24.
Gimpex Limited v Unity Holdings Business Ltd and others and another appeal [2015] SGCA 17
In Gimpex Limited v Unity Holdings Business Ltd and others and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs.
JOHAN DANIEL BLOMBERG v KHAN ZHI YAN
A substantive contractual consent order cannot be set aside ab initio unless there are recognised vitiating factors in contract law; the court has no residual discretion to set aside such orders to prevent injustice.
Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd and another [2014] SGCA 63
In Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd and another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Leave to commence arbitration proceedings, Civil Procedure — Summary judgment.
Santoso Winoto v Suseno Winoto & Anor
The court has the inherent power to stay the implementation and distribution of an order for sale, but such discretion must be exercised on principled grounds. The court will not grant a stay where the application is inappropriate, late, and lacks credible evidence or bona fides.
Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 61
In Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Appeals, Courts and Jurisdiction — Jurisdiction.
Yan Jun v Attorney-General [2014] SGCA 60
In Yan Jun v Attorney-General [2014] SGCA 60, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to allow the appellant's false imprisonment claim to proceed. The court found no basis to strike out claims for loss of liberty and punitive damages.
Zoom Communications Ltd v Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 44
In Zoom Communications Ltd v Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 44, the Court of Appeal affirmed Singapore as the appropriate forum for trial. Despite finding material non-disclosure by the respondent, the court upheld the leave order, emphasizing strong connecting factors over procedural flaws
Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard v Robinson & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 43
In Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard v Robinson & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Striking Out, Employment Law.
Falmac Ltd v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie and another matter [2014] SGCA 42
In Falmac Ltd v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie and another matter, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — appeals.
Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 4
In Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Interrogatories.
Lam Hwa Engineering & Trading Pte Ltd v Yang Qiang [2014] SGCA 3
In Lam Hwa Engineering & Trading Pte Ltd v Yang Qiang, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs, Legal Profession — Duties.
Sandz Solutions (Singapore) Pte Ltd and others v Strategic Worldwide Assets Ltd and others [2014] SGCA 27
In Sandz Solutions (Singapore) Pte Ltd and others v Strategic Worldwide Assets Ltd and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of CIVIL PROCEDURE — Witnesses, Companies — Shares.
Burgundy Global Exploration Corp v Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd and another appeal [2014] SGCA 24
In Burgundy Global Exploration Corp v Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Damages, Civil Procedure — Service.
Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General and another matter [2014] SGCA 23
In Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General and another matter, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Cupid Jewels Pte Ltd v Orchard Central Pte Ltd and another appeal [2014] SGCA 2
In Cupid Jewels Pte Ltd v Orchard Central Pte Ltd and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of CIVIL PROCEDURE — Ex-parte application, LANDLORD AND TENANT — Distress for rent.
Olivine Capital Pte Ltd and another v Chia Chin Yan and another matter [2014] SGCA 19
In Olivine Capital Pte Ltd and another v Chia Chin Yan and another matter, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Summary Judgment, Contract — Interpretation.
Fong Khim Ling (administrator of the estate of Fong Ching Pau Lloyd, deceased) v Tan Teck Ann [2014] SGCA 11
In Fong Khim Ling (administrator of the estate of Fong Ching Pau Lloyd, deceased) v Tan Teck Ann, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Jurisdiction.
The "Nasco Gem" [2014] SGCA 1
Analysis of [2014] SGCA 1, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2014-01-07.
Nim Minimaart (suing as a firm) v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1079 and others [2013] SGCA 54
In Nim Minimaart (suing as a firm) v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1079 and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Jurisdiction.
Koh Chong Chiah and others v Treasure Resort Pte Ltd [2013] SGCA 52
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in Koh Chong Chiah v Treasure Resort, reinstating a representative action for 202 claimants. The court ruled that speculative concerns regarding individual defenses do not justify striking out claims, emphasizing case management over procedural dismissal.