LITT
Try LITT free
Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd v DealStreetAsia Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 74
Pre-action disclosure requires the applicant to show that the order is both necessary and just, with necessity assessed by whether the plaintiff lacks sufficient knowledge to fashion a viable claim.
Wayne Burt Commodities Pte Ltd v Singapore DSS Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 70
In Wayne Burt Commodities Pte Ltd v Singapore DSS Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Summary Judgment.
United Overseas Bank Ltd v Pereira, Dennis John Sunny and another [2017] SGHC 66
In United Overseas Bank Ltd v Pereira, Dennis John Sunny and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Stay of execution, Credit and security — Guarantees and indemnities.
Antariksa Logistics Pte Ltd and others v Nurdian Cuaca and others [2017] SGHC 60
In Antariksa Logistics Pte Ltd and others v Nurdian Cuaca and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Striking out, Res judicata — Extended doctrine.
Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (SATS Security Services Pte Ltd, third party) [2017] SGHC 43
In Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd (SATS Security Services Pte Ltd, third party), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs, Civil Procedure — Offer to settle.
Stepaniuk, Nikolai v Wellstead Corporate Solutions Pte Ltd and others [2017] SGHC 39
In Stepaniuk, Nikolai v Wellstead Corporate Solutions Pte Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Judgment and orders.
KLW Holdings Ltd v Straitsworld Advisory Ltd and another [2017] SGHC 35
In KLW Holdings Ltd v Straitsworld Advisory Ltd and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Summary judgment.
Legis Point LLC v Tay Choon Ai [2017] SGHC 325
In Legis Point LLC v Tay Choon Ai, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Remuneration, Civil Procedure — Costs.
Borneo Ventures Pte Ltd v Ong Han Nam [2017] SGHC 320
In Borneo Ventures Pte Ltd v Ong Han Nam, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Stay of proceedings.
Ma Hongjin v SCP Holdings Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 319
In Ma Hongjin v SCP Holdings Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Summary judgment.
Long Kim Wing v LTX-Credence Singapore Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 312
In Long Kim Wing v LTX-Credence Singapore Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Costs.
Telecom Credit Inc v Star Commerce Pte Ltd (Midas United Group Pte Ltd, garnishee) [2017] SGHC 300
In Telecom Credit Inc v Star Commerce Pte Ltd (Midas United Group Pte Ltd, garnishee), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Judgments and orders.
Sin Herh Construction Pte Ltd v Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd and another [2017] SGHC 3
In Sin Herh Construction Pte Ltd v Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Injunctions, Civil procedure — Judgments and orders.
Neville, Guy v Andrla, Dominic [2017] SGHC 295
Civil Procedure – Summary Judgment Credit and Security – Money and moneylenders – Interest [LawNet Editorial Note: The appeal to this decision in Civil Appeal No 193 of 2017 was withdrawn on 23 November 2017.] 14 November 2017 Belinda Ang Saw Ean J: 1 The plaintiff, Guy Neville, sued the defendant,
BNX v BOE and another matter [2017] SGHC 289
In BNX v BOE and another matter, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award, Civil procedure — Pleadings.
Ebony Ritz Sdn Bhd v Sumatec Resources Bhd [2017] SGHC 282
In Ebony Ritz Sdn Bhd v Sumatec Resources Bhd [2017] SGHC 282, the High Court allowed the plaintiff's appeal, ruling that the defendant failed to secure a timely stay of execution. The Court held that merely filing a stay application does not prevent the entry of judgment.
EQ Capital Investments Ltd v Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd and others (Sim Chye Hock Ron, third party) [2017] SGHC 271
In EQ Capital Investments Ltd v Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd and others (Sim Chye Hock Ron, third party), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Third party proceedings.
Main-line Corporation v United Overseas Bank Ltd and another [2017] SGHC 27
In Main-line Corporation v United Overseas Bank Ltd and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs, Civil Procedure — Offer to settle.
Thu Aung Zaw v Ku Swee Boon (trading as Norb Creative Studio) [2017] SGHC 265
In Thu Aung Zaw v Ku Swee Boon (trading as Norb Creative Studio), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Summary judgment, Civil procedure — Amendments.
Chan Boon Siang and others v Jasmin Nisban [2017] SGHC 249
In Chan Boon Siang and others v Jasmin Nisban, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Striking out.
Harun bin Syed Hussain Aljunied and another v Abdul Samad bin O K Mohamed Haniffa and others [2017] SGHC 248
In Harun bin Syed Hussain Aljunied and another v Abdul Samad bin O K Mohamed Haniffa and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Pleadings, Limitation of actions — When time begins to run.
BGC Partners (Singapore) Ltd v Tan Wee Hiong Kevin [2017] SGHC 214
In BGC Partners (Singapore) Ltd v Tan Wee Hiong Kevin, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Service out of jurisdiction, Conflict of Laws — Stay of court proceedings.
Poh Fu Tek and others v Lee Shung Guan and others [2017] SGHC 212
In Poh Fu Tek and others v Lee Shung Guan and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — oppression, Civil procedure — offer to settle.
Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario v Law Society of Singapore [2017] SGHC 206
In Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario v Law Society of Singapore, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Extension of time, Administrative law — Judicial review.