LITT
Try LITT free
K Solutions Pte Ltd v National University of Singapore [2009] SGHC 143
In K Solutions Pte Ltd v National University of Singapore, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Striking out.
Checkpoint Fluidic Systems International Ltd v Marine Hub Pte Ltd and Another Appeal [2009] SGHC 134
In Checkpoint Fluidic Systems International Ltd v Marine Hub Pte Ltd and Another Appeal, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Agency, Civil Procedure.
Zheng San Gen v OGG Landscape Pte Ltd and Another [2009] SGHC 131
In Zheng San Gen v OGG Landscape Pte Ltd and Another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs.
Anwar Siraj and Another v Ting Kang Chung John and Another [2009] SGHC 129
The court held that an originating summons should not be converted into a writ action where there are no substantial disputes of fact and the allegations of fraud are unsubstantiated.
Tan Keaw Chong v Chua Tiong Guan and Another [2009] SGHC 127
In Tan Keaw Chong v Chua Tiong Guan and Another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
XFactor Consolidated (M) Sdn Bhd v IT21 (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Others [2009] SGHC 123
In XFactor Consolidated (M) Sdn Bhd v IT21 (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract, Civil Procedure.
Singapore Flyer Pte Ltd v Purcell Peter Francis [2009] SGHC 120
The High Court dismissed the application to strike out the originating summons in Singapore Flyer Pte Ltd v Purcell Peter Francis [2009] SGHC 120, ruling that a director's reappointment did not constitute a new cause of action under the Eshelby Principle, as the core legal basis remained unchanged.
Zhong Da Chemical Development Co Ltd v Lanco Industries Ltd [2009] SGHC 112
In Zhong Da Chemical Development Co Ltd v Lanco Industries Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs.
Calwealth Properties Pte Ltd v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 562 [2009] SGHC 108
A party is precluded by the doctrine of res judicata from re-litigating issues that have already been decided by a court in previous proceedings.
Teleoptik-Ziroskopi and others v Westacre Investments Inc and other appeals
The court held that a trial was necessary to resolve factual issues regarding the beneficial ownership of funds in garnishee proceedings, as summary determination was inappropriate where the legal issues depended on disputed facts.
Yokogawa Engineering Asia Pte Ltd v Transtel Engineering Pte Ltd [2009] SGHC 1
A party is estopped by representation from asserting a dispute resolution mechanism different from the one it represented to the other party, where the other party has relied on that representation to its detriment.
The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 689 v DTZ Debenham Tie Leung (SEA) Pte Ltd and Another [2008] SGHC 98
The court held that litigation privilege requires a reasonable prospect of litigation and that the dominant purpose of the document creation must be for such litigation. The court also clarified the distinction between jurisdiction and discretion in discovery applications.
Yeo Boong Hua and Others v Turf City Pte Ltd and Others and Another Suit [2008] SGHC 93
In Yeo Boong Hua and Others v Turf City Pte Ltd and Others and Another Suit, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Amendments.
Frantonios Marine Services Pte Ltd and Another v Kay Swee Tuan [2008] SGHC 91
The court held that once the condition in s 388 of the Companies Act is satisfied, the court has discretion to order security for costs, and the policy of the legislation is to protect defendants against impecunious companies.
Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd v BNP Paribas [2008] SGHC 86
In Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd v BNP Paribas, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Agency — Third party and principal’s relations, Civil Procedure — Originating processes.
Vita Life Sciences Limited and Another v Arthur Andersen and Another [2008] SGHC 85
In Vita Life Sciences Limited and Another v Arthur Andersen and Another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd and Others [2008] SGHC 84
In Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd and Others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Tan Kah Hock and Another v Chou Li Chen and Others [2008] SGHC 82
The High Court allowed the appeal in Tan Kah Hock v Chou Li Chen [2008] SGHC 82, ruling that plaintiffs need not elect between concurrent Singaporean and Australian proceedings where causes of action are distinct and provide legitimate juridical advantages, rejecting claims of vexation.
Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P and Another and Another Suit [2008] SGHC 76
In Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P and Another and Another Suit, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Striking out, Evidence — Proof of evidence.
Regalindo Resources Pte Ltd v Seatrek Trans Pte Ltd [2008] SGHC 74
In Regalindo Resources Pte Ltd v Seatrek Trans Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Injunctions.
Ong Wui Jin and Others v Ong Wui Teck [2008] SGHC 72
In Ong Wui Jin and Others v Ong Wui Teck, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Mohamed Iskandar bin Jumari v Tan Seng Poh [2008] SGHC 71
In Mohamed Iskandar bin Jumari v Tan Seng Poh, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Mok Kwong Yue v Ding Leng Kong [2008] SGHC 65
In Mok Kwong Yue v Ding Leng Kong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Petroval SA v Stainby Overseas Ltd and Others [2008] SGHC 64
In Petroval SA v Stainby Overseas Ltd [2008] SGHC 64, the High Court set aside the action, ruling it lacked jurisdiction under The Siskina doctrine. The court ordered an inquiry into damages for the defendants and awarded costs, emphasizing strict limits on seeking interlocutory relief in Singapore.