LITT
Try LITT free
Republic Airconditioning (S) Pte Ltd v Shinsung Eng Co Ltd (Singapore Branch) [2012] SGHC 46
In Republic Airconditioning (S) Pte Ltd v Shinsung Eng Co Ltd (Singapore Branch), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Summary Judgment.
Breezeway Overseas Ltd v UBS AG [2012] SGHC 41
In Breezeway Overseas Ltd v UBS AG, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Electronic Discovery.
Chia Kok Kee v Tan Wah and others [2012] SGHC 36
In Chia Kok Kee v Tan Wah and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Striking Out.
Wong Wan Chin v Wang Choong Li (now or formerly trading as The Feline Bridal) [2012] SGHC 24
In Wong Wan Chin v Wang Choong Li (now or formerly trading as The Feline Bridal), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Koh Chong Chiah and others v Treasure Resort Pte Ltd and another [2012] SGHC 239
In Koh Chong Chiah and others v Treasure Resort Pte Ltd and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Rules of Court.
Henan Province Construction Group Corp Ltd (Singapore Branch) (formerly trading as Henan Province Construction Corp (Singapore Branch)) and another v Evanbuild Engineering Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 231
The High Court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff, holding the Defendant liable to indemnify losses under performance bonds. The court rejected restrictive interpretations of the indemnity, affirming the Plaintiff's absolute right to compromise claims and granting interlocutory judgment for the Plainti
Yeo Boong Hua and others v Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd and others [2012] SGHC 227
In Yeo Boong Hua and others v Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Setting aside of consent order.
Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v Attorney-General [2012] SGHC 221
In Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v Attorney-General [2012] SGHC 221, the court departed from the general rule that costs follow the event, ordering no costs for either party. It ruled that public interest litigation requires a genuine lack of private interest, not just raising public law issues.
Tan Kee Huat v Lim Kui Lin [2012] SGHC 218
In Tan Kee Huat v Lim Kui Lin, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Ong Kim Yeng and another v Forte Development Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 215
In Ong Kim Yeng and another v Forte Development Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Originating processes.
Giorgio Ferrari Pte Ltd v Lifebrandz Ltd and others [2012] SGHC 206
In Giorgio Ferrari Pte Ltd v Lifebrandz Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Toh Her Chiew (Zhuo Huoshu) and another v Grand Isle Holdings Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 201
Pleadings must identify the cause of action (contract or tort) and not merely set out evidence; further and better particulars are not for the purpose of obtaining evidence.
Garden Hub Pte Ltd v Attorney-General [2012] SGHC 20
In Garden Hub Pte Ltd v Attorney-General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Sembcorp Marine Ltd v Aurol Anthony Sabastian [2012] SGHC 195
In Sembcorp Marine Ltd v Aurol Anthony Sabastian, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Supreme Court of Judicature Act, Contempt of Court — Criminal Contempt Criminal Procedure and Sentencing.
Nanyang Law LLC v Alphomega Research Group Ltd [2012] SGHC 184
In Nanyang Law LLC v Alphomega Research Group Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs.
Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank AG [2012] SGHC 182
In Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank AG, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — damages, Damages — assessment.
Jurong Town Corp v Dauphin Shipyard Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 179
In Jurong Town Corp v Dauphin Shipyard Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Summary Judgment, Landlord and Tenant — Agreements for leases.
Mitora Pte Ltd v Agritrade International (Pte) Ltd [2012] SGHC 178
In Mitora Pte Ltd v Agritrade International (Pte) Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Striking out.
Chia Kim Huay (litigation representative of the estate of Chua Chye Hee, deceased) v Saw Shu Mawa Min Min and another [2012] SGHC 172
In Chia Kim Huay (litigation representative of the estate of Chua Chye Hee, deceased) v Saw Shu Mawa Min Min and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — offer to settle, Civil procedure — service.
Breezeway Overseas Ltd and another v UBS AG and others [2012] SGHC 170
In Breezeway Overseas Ltd and another v UBS AG and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Discovery of documents.
Then Khek Khoon and another v Arjun Permanand Samtani and another [2012] SGHC 17
In Then Khek Khoon and another v Arjun Permanand Samtani and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession — Professional Conduct, Civil Procedure — Injunctions.
WestLB AG v Philippine National Bank and others [2012] SGHC 162
In WestLB AG v Philippine National Bank and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Interpleader, Conflict of laws — Choice of law.
WEN HANRONG v HUATIONG CONTRACTOR PTE LTD & Anor
The court assessed damages for personal injuries sustained in a traffic accident, rejecting claims for heart and lung complications due to lack of causal link, and provided guidance on the conduct of counsel in assessment proceedings.
AstraZeneca AB (SE) v Sanofi-Aventis Singapore Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 16
In AstraZeneca AB v Sanofi-Aventis, the Singapore High Court ruled that patentees need not plead specific product composition details in section 12A Medicines Act actions. The court dismissed the striking-out application, prioritizing the legislative intent for discovery over initial pleading.