LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

IM Skaugen SE and another v MAN Diesel & Turbo SE and another [2016] SGHCR 6

In IM Skaugen SE and another v MAN Diesel & Turbo SE and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Choses in Action — Assignment, Civil Procedure — Transfer to SICC.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Ding Pei Zhen v Yap Son On [2015] SGHC 246

In Ding Pei Zhen v Yap Son On, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Choses in Action — assignment, Contract — contractual terms.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

IM Skaugen SE and another v MAN Diesel & Turbo SE and another [2018] SGHC 123

In IM Skaugen SE and another v MAN Diesel & Turbo SE and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Choses in Action — Assignment, Conflict of Laws — Choice of Law.

Sushant Shukla· ·10 min read
Singapore

Sutherland Hugh David Brodie v Official Assignee and another [2021] SGHC 65

In Sutherland Hugh David Brodie v Official Assignee and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Choses In Action — Assignment, Equity — Estoppel.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi (legal representative of the estate of Maran s/o Kannakasabai, deceased) [2014] SGCA 38

In Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi (legal representative of the estate of Maran s/o Kannakasabai, deceased), the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Choses in action — assignment.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas [2010] SGCA 2

In Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Striking out, Choses in Action — Assignment.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Tsu Soo Sin v Oei Tjiong Bin and Another [2008] SGCA 46

In Tsu Soo Sin v Oei Tjiong Bin [2008] SGCA 46, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was entitled to moneys as a joint assignee. The court dismissed the respondents' claim, clarifying that equity will not convert a joint tenancy into a tenancy in common without considera

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read