LITT
Try LITT free
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2024] DIFC CFI 108 — Refusal to set aside order regarding extension of time to appeal (07 February 2024)
The DIFC Court of First Instance reaffirms its strict procedural requirements, denying a set-aside application where the defendants failed to justify their historical non-engagement or provide substantive grounds for a proposed appeal.
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2023] DIFC CFI 108 — Refusal of retrospective extension for appeal (07 December 2023)
The litigation involves a claim initiated by Alexander Reuter and Andre Bledjian against Wellness United INC. and two individual co-defendants. Following a judgment delivered on 27 October 2023, the defendants sought to challenge the outcome by filing an application for a retrospective extension of…
Alexander Reuter v Wellness United [2021] DIFC CFI 108 — Enforcement of loan agreements and personal guarantees (27 October 2023)
The DIFC Court of First Instance affirmed the enforceability of commercial loan agreements and personal guarantees, dismissing last-minute adjournment tactics and meritless defenses of illegality and conflict of interest.
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2023] DIFC CFI 108 — Procedural timeline for amendment of pleadings (23 February 2023)
The lawsuit involves a multi-party dispute between Alexander Reuter and Andre Bledjian as Claimants, and Wellness United, Jacob Logothetis, and Angela Turovskaya as Defendants. The core of this specific procedural intervention concerns the Claimants' Application No.
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2022] DIFC CFI 108 — Setting aside a default judgment (17 November 2022)
The litigation involves a multi-party claim initiated by Mr. Alexander Reuter and Mr. Andre Bledjian against Wellness United Inc. and two individual co-defendants. The dispute centers on the legal obligations and potential liabilities arising from the business activities of the corporate entity and…
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2022] DIFC CFI 108 — Stay of enforcement pending set-aside application (30 September 2022)
This order addresses the procedural intersection between an existing default judgment and a pending application to set aside, clarifying the court's stance on maintaining the status quo during active challenges to judgment validity.
MR. ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2022] DIFC CFI 108 — Default judgment for unpaid claims (29 July 2022)
The litigation involved two claimants, Mr. Alexander Reuter and Mr. Andre Bledjian, who initiated proceedings against Wellness United Inc. and two individual respondents, Mr. Jacob Logothetis and Ms. Angela Turovskaya.