LITT
Try LITT free
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2024] DIFC CFI 090 — Dismissal of stay of execution pending appeal (20 May 2024)
The DIFC Court of First Instance confirms that a stay of execution is untenable once the underlying applications for permission to appeal have been dismissed.
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2024] DIFC CFI 090 — Procedural extension for PTA response (04 January 2024)
The litigation in CFI 090/2022 involves a banking dispute between the Claimant, Bank of Singapore Limited, and the Defendants, Marj Holding Limited and Mohammed Ahmad Ramadhan Juma. While the specific underlying commercial claims are not detailed in this procedural order, the case reached a…
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2024] DIFC CFI 090 — Costs allocation following successful immediate judgment (03 January 2024)
This order clarifies the procedural mechanics of cost recovery in the DIFC when a claimant secures immediate judgment on a primary debt claim while a secondary misrepresentation claim remains pending.
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2022] DIFC CFI 090 — Immediate judgment in a USD 55.8 million debt claim (20 November 2023)
The dispute centers on a credit facility agreement entered into in October 2021, under which the Bank of Singapore provided MARJ Holding Limited with revolving short-term advances and trading facilities. Mr.
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2023] DIFC CFI 090 — Procedural variation of consent order deadlines (12 September 2023)
The litigation involves Bank of Singapore Limited as the Claimant against Marj Holding Limited and Mohammed Ahmad Ramadhan Juma as the Defendants. The dispute centers on the Claimant’s pursuit of an Immediate Judgment Application, which was filed on 2 June 2023 under Part 24 of the Rules of the…
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2023] DIFC CFI 090 — Procedural timeline for Part 24 Immediate Judgment (05 September 2023)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Bank of Singapore Limited against Marj Holding Limited and Mohammed Ahmad Ramadhan Juma. While the underlying merits of the claim are not detailed in the procedural order, the case has reached a critical juncture where the Claimant is seeking a summary…
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2023] DIFC CFI 090 — Procedural extension for immediate judgment evidence (21 August 2023)
The litigation involves a claim brought by the Bank of Singapore against Marj Holding Limited and Mohammed Ahmad Ramadhan Juma. The core of the current procedural dispute centers on the Claimant’s pursuit of an Immediate Judgment Application, filed under RDC 24 on 21 June 2023.
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2023] DIFC CFI 090 — Withdrawal of legal representation (20 June 2023)
The dispute in CFI 090/2022 involves a banking claim initiated by Bank of Singapore against Marj Holding Limited and Mohammed Ahmad Ramadhan Juma. The litigation, which falls under the jurisdiction of the DIFC Courts, reached a procedural juncture regarding the status of the Defendants' legal…
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2023] DIFC CFI 090 — Consent order adjourning CMC pending immediate judgment application (19 June 2023)
The litigation involves a banking dispute initiated by Bank of Singapore Limited against Marj Holding Limited and Mohammed Ahmad Ramadhan Juma. While the underlying merits of the claim remain to be fully ventilated in subsequent filings, the procedural posture of the case has been defined by the…
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2023] DIFC CFI 090 — Consent order adjourning CMC pending immediate judgment application (19 May 2023)
The litigation involves Bank of Singapore Limited as the Claimant against two Defendants: Marj Holding Limited and Mohammed Ahmad Ramadhan Juma. While the specific underlying contractual or tortious basis of the claim remains subject to further pleadings, the procedural posture of the case…
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2023] DIFC CFI 090 — Procedural extension via consent order (08 March 2023)
The litigation involves a banking dispute initiated by Bank of Singapore Limited against Marj Holding Limited and Mohammed Ahmad Ramadhan Juma. While the substantive merits of the claim remain pending, the current procedural posture involves the exchange of pleadings.
BANK OF SINGAPORE v MARJ HOLDING [2023] DIFC CFI 090 — Procedural extension for pleadings (14 February 2023)
The litigation involves a banking dispute initiated by Bank of Singapore Limited against Marj Holding Limited and Mohammed Ahmad Ramadhan Juma. While the specific underlying financial claims remain subject to the ongoing pleadings process, the matter has reached a stage where the parties are…