LITT
Try LITT free
BARCLAYS BANK PLC v HIS EXCELLENCY HAMAD SUHAIL. O. AL KHAILI [2021] DIFC CFI 086 — Permission to appeal granted on jurisdictional conflict (18 January 2021)
The litigation centers on a conflict of jurisdiction regarding the enforcement and adjudication of banking disputes. Barclays Bank PLC initiated a Part 8 claim on 20 October 2020, seeking two primary declarations from the DIFC Court.
BARCLAYS BANK PLC v HIS EXCELLENCY HAMAD SUHAIL O AL KHAILI [2020] DIFC CFI 086 — Jurisdictional limits regarding onshore final judgments (30 November 2020)
Barclays Bank PLC initiated a Part 8 claim on 20 October 2020, seeking two distinct declarations from the DIFC Court. The first declaration concerned the "Dispute Referred to the Abu Dhabi Courts," which involved matters brought by the defendant, His Excellency Hamad Suhail O.
BARCLAYS BANK PLC v HAMAD SUHAIL O AL KHAILI [2020] DIFC CFI 086 — Alternative service via electronic channels (26 October 2020)
Barclays Bank PLC initiated proceedings against His Excellency Hamad Suhail O Al Khaili and Mr Ibrahim Daoud Jaffal to facilitate the service of a Part 8 Application. The dispute centers on the enforcement of obligations related to a banking account held by the First Defendant with the Claimant.
BARCLAYS BANK PLC v HIS EXCELLENCY HAMAD SUHAIL O AL KHAILI [2020] DIFC CFI 086 — Alternative service via WhatsApp and email (22 October 2020)
The lawsuit concerns a banking dispute initiated by Barclays Bank PLC against two defendants: His Excellency Hamad Suhail O Al Khaili (the First Defendant) and Mr Ibrahim Daoud Jaffal (the Second Defendant).
BARCLAYS BANK PLC v HIS EXCELLENCY HAMAD SUHAIL. O. AL KHAILI [2020] DIFC CFI 086 — Strict evidentiary standards for alternative service (21 October 2020)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the high threshold for granting alternative service via digital channels, emphasizing that general email addresses and unverified mobile numbers are insufficient for procedural compliance.