LITT
Try LITT free
LAPIS v LARAMIE AND LASH [2019] DIFC CFI 086 — Enforcement of settlement agreement and guarantor liability (06 October 2022)
The dispute arose from a breach of a Settlement Agreement entered into on 5 December 2019 between the Claimant, Lapis, and the Defendants, Laramie (D1) and Lash (D2). The parties had previously operated under a distribution agreement, but following payment defaults, the Claimant ceased product…
RAK CERAMICS v ASSALA DEVELOPMENT [2022] DIFC CFI 086 — Procedural withdrawal of legal representation (23 November 2022)
This order addresses the procedural requirements for legal counsel to formally withdraw from representing a party in ongoing litigation before the DIFC Court of First Instance.
RAK CERAMICS P.J.S.C. v ASSALA DEVELOPMENTS SARL [2019] DIFC CFI 086 — Enforcement of settlement agreement and guarantor liability (06 October 2022)
The DIFC Court of First Instance affirms the enforceability of settlement agreements and the liability of non-signatory guarantors who participate in commercial negotiations.
RAK CERAMICS v ASSALA DEVELOPMENT [2021] DIFC CFI 086 — Extension of time for service of claim form (02 May 2021)
The litigation between RAK Ceramics P.J.S.C and Assala Development SARL, registered under CFI 086/2019, reached a procedural juncture in early 2021 regarding the validity of service.
RAK CERAMICS v ASSALA DEVELOPMENT [2021] DIFC CFI 086 — Extension of time for service of claim form (05 January 2021)
The dispute between RAK Ceramics and Assala Development, registered under CFI 086/2019, centers on the Claimant’s efforts to progress its litigation within the DIFC Court of First Instance.
RAK CERAMICS v ASSALA DEVELOPMENT [2020] DIFC CFI 086 — Extension of time for service of claim form (08 July 2020)
The DIFC Court of First Instance grants a procedural extension for the service of a claim form, reinforcing the court's case management discretion under the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC).