LITT
Try LITT free
MOHAMMED ZAHID ASLAM v SDI CAPITAL [2019] DIFC CFI 084 — Default judgment for unpaid wages and statutory penalties (31 July 2019)
The dispute originated from the employment relationship between the Claimant, Mohammed Zahid Aslam, and the First Defendant, SDI Capital Limited, a DIFC-registered entity. The Claimant initiated proceedings to recover outstanding financial entitlements, specifically unpaid wages, payment in lieu of…
MOHAMMED ZAHID ASLAM v SDI CAPITAL [2019] DIFC CFI 084 — Employment judgment for unpaid wages and statutory penalties (22 August 2019)
The litigation centered on the Claimant’s pursuit of outstanding employment entitlements following his tenure with the First Defendant. The dispute involved a comprehensive claim for unpaid wages, accrued holiday pay, and end-of-service gratuity.
MOHAMMED ZAHID ASLAM v SDI CAPITAL [2019] DIFC CFI 084 — Referral of enforcement proceedings following non-compliance (19 December 2019)
This order addresses the procedural escalation of enforcement measures in CFI 084/2018, where the failure of the Judgment Debtor to engage with the Court necessitated a referral from the Deputy Registrar to a Judge.
MOHAMMED ZAHID ASLAM v SDI CAPITAL [2019] DIFC CFI 084 — Procedural discipline in complex commercial litigation (07 May 2019)
The order imposes a rigorous requirement for the parties to synthesize their factual narratives into a coherent, cross-referenced document. By requiring the Claimant to lead the filing of this chronology, the Court ensures that the trial judge is presented with a structured overview of the case,…
MOHAMMED ZAHID ASLAM v SDI CAPITAL [2019] DIFC CFI 084 — procedural roadmap for trial preparation (24 April 2019)
The Court has mandated a collaborative approach to the factual narrative of the dispute. To ensure the trial judge is presented with a streamlined version of the evidence, the parties are required to synthesize their respective positions into a single, cross-referenced document.
MOHAMMED ZAHID ASLAM v SDI CAPITAL [2019] DIFC CFI 084 — Judicial oversight of document production (22 April 2019)
The litigation involves a dispute between Mohammed Zahid Aslam (the Claimant) and SDI Capital Limited and SDI Capital Holdings Limited (the Defendants). The core of the current procedural impasse centered on the exchange of evidence pursuant to the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC).
MOHAMED ZAHID ASLAM v SDI CAPITAL [2019] DIFC CFI 084 — Procedural withdrawal of legal representation (21 April 2019)
This order formalizes the cessation of legal representation for SDI Capital Limited and SDI Capital Holdings Limited, establishing the procedural requirements for a law firm to exit the record in the DIFC Courts.
MOHAMMED ZAHID ASLAM v SDI CAPITAL [2018] DIFC CFI 084 — Employment visa transfer order (31 December 2018)
The DIFC Court of First Instance grants an urgent application for the transfer of an employment visa following the failure of the employer to respond to the claimant's request.