LITT
Try LITT free
TARIG RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 069 — Correction of accidental slips in employment judgment (30 November 2021)
The litigation between Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla and Expresso Telecom Group Ltd centered on a high-stakes employment dispute involving claims for gratuity, accrued leave, and penalties.
TARIG H.A.G RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2020] DIFC CFI 069 — Case management order for trial preparation (30 November 2020)
The litigation concerns a claim brought by Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla against Expresso Telecom Group Ltd. While the underlying merits of the claim are not detailed in this specific procedural order, the case has progressed through several stages of judicial oversight, including document production…
TARIG H.A.G. RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2022] DIFC CFI 069 — Granting a second application for permission to appeal (05 April 2022)
The litigation between Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla and Expresso Telecom Group Ltd originated as a claim within the DIFC Court of First Instance. Following a judgment delivered by Justice Sir Peter Gross on 8 August 2021, the defendant sought to challenge the court's findings.
TARIG H.A.G. RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 069 — Refusal of permission to appeal and stay of execution (28 December 2021)
The underlying dispute in this matter concerns the claimant, Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla, and his former employer, Expresso Telecom Group. Following an initial judgment delivered on 8 August 2021, the defendant sought to challenge the court's findings regarding the claimant's entitlement to…
TARIG H.A.G. RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2020] DIFC CFI 069 — Employment termination for secret profits and penalty claim adjudication (09 December 2021)
The dispute arose from the termination of Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla (TR), a former executive at Expresso Telecom Group (ETG), who sought payment of end-of-service entitlements, including unpaid gratuity and accrued annual leave.
TARIG H.A.G. RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2020] DIFC CFI 069 — Employment termination and fiduciary duty dispute (07 December 2021)
The litigation arose from the termination of Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla (TR), a former executive at Expresso Telecom Group (ETG), who sought unpaid end-of-service entitlements and statutory penalties.
TARIG H.A.G. RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2020] DIFC CFI 069 — Breach of fiduciary duty and termination for cause (30 November 2021)
The dispute arose from the termination of Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla (TR), a former executive at Expresso Telecom Group (ETG), who sought unpaid employment entitlements totaling US$785,015.80.
TARIG H.A.G RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2020] DIFC CFI 069 — Summary assessment of costs and interest following employment judgment (22 November 2021)
The lawsuit originated from an employment dispute where the Claimant, Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla (TR), sought various payments from his former employer, Expresso Telecom Group (ETG). Following the Court’s substantive judgment on 8 August 2021, which awarded TR USD 404,896.67 plus a daily payment…
TARIG H.A.G RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 069 — Procedural extension for appellate filings (16 November 2021)
The dispute centers on the procedural timeline governing the appeal process following the initial proceedings in CFI 069/2020. Expresso Telecom Group, as the Defendant, sought judicial intervention to rectify a delay in its appellate filings.
TARIG H.A.G. RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 069 — Procedural extension of time for evidence filing (02 November 2021)
The dispute involves a procedural application filed by the Claimant, Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla, against the Defendant, Expresso Telecom Group Ltd. The core of the matter before the Court on 2 November 2021 was not the underlying merits of the claim, but rather a request for an extension of time to…
TARIG H.A.G. RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 069 — Procedural management of appellate timelines (26 October 2021)
The litigation involves a dispute between the Claimant, Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla, and the Defendant, Expresso Telecom Group. Following the initial proceedings, the Defendant initiated an appeal process, filing an Appeal Notice on 30 August 2021.
TARIG H.A.G. RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2020] DIFC CFI 069 — Employment termination for cause and secret profits (08 August 2021)
The dispute arose from the termination of Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla (TR), a former executive at Expresso Telecom Group (ETG), who sought various end-of-service entitlements and statutory penalties. The total amount claimed by the Claimant reached US$785,015.80.
TARIG H.A.G RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 069 — Procedural discipline in employment litigation (31 March 2021)
The lawsuit concerns an employment dispute brought by Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla against Expresso Telecom Group. While the specific quantum of the primary claim remains confidential within the court records, the litigation involves significant counter-allegations regarding breach of contract.
TARIG RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 069 — Procedural timeline adjustment via consent order (07 March 2021)
The litigation involves a claim initiated by Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla against Expresso Telecom Group, a telecommunications entity, which commenced with the filing of a Claim Form on 30 August 2020.
TARIG H.A.G. RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 069 — Document production dispute resolution (22 February 2021)
The litigation involves a dispute between the Claimant, Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla, and the Defendant, Expresso Telecom Group, which has escalated into a contest over the scope of document production.