LITT
Try LITT free
TARIG MOHAMED ABDELSALAM ABDELRAHMAN v EXEPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2022] DIFC CFI 056 — Amended order for escrow release (24 March 2022)
The dispute originated from a claim filed under CFI 056/2021, involving Tarig Mohamed Abdelsalam Abdelrahman and Exepresso Telecom Group. The litigation reached a critical juncture when Justice Sir Jeremy Cooke issued an order on 5 December 2021, mandating that the Defendant pay the sum of USD…
TARIG MOHAMED ABDELSALAM ABDELRAHMAN v EXEPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2022] DIFC CFI 056 — Registrar’s order for release of settlement funds (10 March 2022)
This order formalizes the distribution of settlement funds held in the DIFC Courts’ Escrow Account following a mediated resolution between the parties.
TARIG MOHAMED ABDELSALAM ABDELRAHMAN v EXEPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2022] DIFC CFI 056 — Costs reservation in interlocutory proceedings (26 January 2022)
Justice Sir Jeremy Cooke’s order underscores the DIFC Court’s judicial preference for reserving costs in interlocutory applications where the final liability remains contingent on the ultimate resolution of the underlying dispute.
TARIG MOHAMED ABDELSALAM ABDELRAHMAN v EXEPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2022] DIFC CFI 056 — Procedural management of escrow funds and amended pleadings (04 January 2022)
Justice Sir Jeremy Cooke clarifies the restrictive purpose of funds paid into court on admissions and establishes a strict procedural timeline for resolving contested amendments to pleadings in an employment dispute.
TARIG MOHAMED ABDELSALAM ABDELRAHMAN v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 056 — Default Judgment set aside (05 December 2021)
The dispute arose from the termination of an employment contract entered into on 1 August 2019, under which the Claimant served as the managing director of the Defendant’s subsidiary in Mauritania.
TARIG MOHAMED ABDELSALAM ABDELRAHMAN v EXEPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 056 — Refusal of late-stage evidence submission (14 November 2021)
The dispute centers on the Claimant’s attempt to introduce additional evidence in the form of comments regarding the Defendant’s Third Witness Statement. Following the filing of that statement by Exepresso Telecom Group on 19 October 2021, the Claimant sought formal permission from the Court to…
TARIG MOHAMED ABDELSALAM ABDELRAHMAN v EXEPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 056 — Default judgment for USD 447,700 (01 September 2021)
The DIFC Court of First Instance confirms the procedural requirements for obtaining a default judgment where a defendant fails to acknowledge service or file a defence within the prescribed timeframe.