LITT
Try LITT free
MR ANDREW RAOF v KBH LIMITED [2024] DIFC CFI 052 — Consent order dismissing proceedings following confidential settlement (12 December 2024)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formally concludes the dispute between Mr Andrew Raof and KBH Limited, vacating all scheduled trial dates following a private settlement agreement.
MR ANDREW RAOF v KBH LIMITED [2024] DIFC CFI 052 — Case management order regarding mediation (26 November 2024)
The DIFC Court of First Instance has formalised the procedural path for the resolution of CFI 052/2023, mandating a specific mediation framework to address the ongoing dispute between Mr Andrew Raof and KBH Limited.
MR ANDREW RAOF v KBH LIMITED [2024] DIFC CFI 052 — Case Management Order (10 October 2024)
The lawsuit involves a general litigation dispute between the Claimant, Mr Andrew Raof, and the Defendant, KBH Limited (formerly known as KBH Kaanuun Limited). While the substantive merits of the claim remain to be ventilated at trial, the current procedural posture centers on the Court’s effort to…
ANDREW RAOF v KBH LIMITED [2024] DIFC CFI 052 — Consent order setting aside default judgment (03 June 2024)
The litigation between Andrew Raof and KBH Limited (formerly known as Kaanuun Limited) reached a critical juncture following the defendant's failure to comply with procedural timelines.
ANDREW RAOF v KBH LIMITED [2024] DIFC CFI 052 — Default judgment following failed jurisdiction challenge (14 May 2024)
The lawsuit concerns an employment dispute between Andrew Raof and KBH Limited (formerly Kaanuun Limited). The claimant sought recovery of unpaid entitlements following the termination of his employment, alongside statutory penalties and compensation for alleged discrimination and victimisation.
ANDREW RAOF v KBH LIMITED [2024] DIFC CFI 052 — Costs assessment for solicitor litigants in person (09 May 2024)
The dispute originated from a jurisdictional challenge brought by the Defendant, KBH Limited, against the Claimant, Andrew Raof. The Defendant sought to have the claim dismissed on the basis that the service of the claim form was procedurally defective under the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC).
ANDREW RAOF v KBH LIMITED [2024] DIFC CFI 052 — Procedural continuity of SCT-to-CFI transfers (16 April 2024)
This ruling clarifies that claims transferred from the Small Claims Tribunal to the Court of First Instance retain their original procedural life, preventing the extinguishment of claims due to technical re-filing requirements.
ANDREW RAOF v KBH LIMITED [2024] DIFC CFI 052 — Procedural validity of SCT-to-CFI transfers (15 April 2024)
The dispute arose from the termination of Andrew Raof’s employment as a dispute resolution associate at KBH Limited. Raof initially filed a claim in the SCT seeking AED 892,022.09, comprising compensation for discrimination and victimisation under Part 9 of the DIFC Employment Law, alongside unpaid…