LITT
Try LITT free
HEPHER ASSOCIATES v RASANA ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES [2019] DIFC CFI 043 — Striking out a defence for non-attendance at trial (05 May 2019)
This judgment addresses the procedural consequences of a defendant’s failure to appear at trial, resulting in the striking out of the defence and the subsequent entry of judgment for the claimants in a complex construction consultancy dispute.
HEPHER ASSOCIATES v RASANA ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES CO [2019] DIFC CFI 043 — Default costs assessment following failure to file points of dispute (18 December 2019)
The underlying litigation, registered under case number CFI-043-2017, involved the Claimants, Hepher Associates Ltd and Trevor Anscombe, and the Defendant, Rasana Engineering Industries Co. LLC. Following a substantive judgment delivered by H.E.
HEPHER ASSOCIATES v RASANA ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES CO [2019] DIFC CFI 043 — Procedural order for withdrawal of legal representation (04 March 2019)
The application filed on 4 March 2019 by Ahmed Bin Dhahi Advocates and Legal Consultants was a formal procedural step to terminate their role as the legal representative for the Defendant, Rasana Engineering Industries Co.
HEPHER ASSOCIATES v RASANA ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES CO. [2018] DIFC CFI 043 — Case Management Order (01 November 2018)
The lawsuit involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Hepher Associates Ltd., and the Defendant, Rasana Engineering Industries Co. LLC. While the specific underlying cause of action is not detailed in the procedural order, the court’s focus on expert evidence regarding "payments" and…
HEPHER ASSOCIATES v RASANA ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES [2018] DIFC CFI 043 — Setting aside default judgment for a real prospect of success (30 April 2018)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Hepher Associates Ltd and Trevor Anscombe against Rasana Engineering Industries Co. LLC. The matter reached a critical juncture on 28 January 2018, when a default judgment was entered against the Defendant by Judicial Officer Nassir Al Nasser.