LITTLITT Try LITT free
uae-difc-cases

WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order and trial vacation (12 December 2016)

The litigation initiated by William Daniel Milligan against Al Mojil Investment Limited under case number CFI 037/2015 concerned a commercial claim brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Procedural variation of trial timelines (24 October 2016)

The litigation involves a claim brought by William Daniel Milligan against Al Mojil Investment Limited. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain outside the scope of this specific procedural order, the case reached a critical juncture in late 2016 where the parties sought to…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — procedural amendment and the avoidance of mini-trials (03 October 2016)

The dispute centers on the Claimant’s attempt to recover outstanding salary, notice pay, and end-of-service gratuity following the termination of his employment. Initially, the Claimant pursued these claims against a different entity, MMG, but subsequently discontinued that action and sought to…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for counterclaim discontinuance (29 August 2016)

The litigation under case number CFI 037/2015 involved a primary claim brought by William Daniel Milligan against Al Mojil Investment Limited. While the specific underlying commercial merits of the main claim remain outside the scope of this procedural order, the case reached a critical juncture…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Case Management Order (03 August 2016)

The litigation concerns a conflict between the Claimant, William Daniel Milligan, and the Defendant, Al Mojil Investment Limited. The current procedural posture is defined by two opposing applications that threaten the viability of the claim.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for discontinuance (20 July 2016)

The litigation, registered under CFI 037/2015, involved William Daniel Milligan as the Claimant and two entities, Al Mojil Investment Limited and Mohammed Al-Mojil Group, as the First and Second Defendants, respectively.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for stay of proceedings (06 April 2016)

The litigation involves William Daniel Milligan as the Claimant against Al Mojil Investment Limited (First Defendant) and Mohammed Al-Mojil Group (Second Defendant). While the underlying substantive claims are not detailed in the consent order, the procedural history indicates a significant…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for mediation stay (22 March 2016)

The litigation under case number CFI 037/2015 involves a claim brought by William Daniel Milligan against two corporate entities: Al Mojil Investment Limited (the First Defendant) and Mohammed Al-Mojil Group (the Second Defendant).

Sushant Shukla· ·7 min read