LITT
Try LITT free
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Consent dismissal of costs assessment payment application (23 June 2023)
The dispute centered on the procedural funding required to initiate the formal assessment of legal costs following the underlying litigation in CFI 029/2018. The Defendant, Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid, had filed Application No.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural timeline extension for Consolidated Costs Assessment (26 May 2023)
The litigation between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a protracted affair involving multiple layers of procedural history, including substantive CFI proceedings and subsequent appellate review.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural extension for consolidated costs assessment (11 May 2023)
The litigation between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a protracted matter involving multiple stages of proceedings, including both the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Consolidation of costs assessment procedures (24 March 2023)
The dispute between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a long-standing fixture in the DIFC Courts, involving multiple procedural stages, including default judgment challenges and disclosure disputes.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2023] DIFC CFI 029 — Post-judgment interest and cost assessment guidance (10 March 2023)
The dispute centered on the Defendant’s entitlement to interest on a penalty sum of AED 244,640, which had been the subject of previous appellate proceedings. Following the Court of Appeal’s decision in CA-005-2022, which remitted the interest application to the trial judge, Justice Sir Richard…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v MR ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Consent order staying detailed assessment of costs (20 October 2022)
The litigation between The Industrial Group and Mr Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a protracted matter involving multiple procedural stages, including default judgment challenges and disclosure disputes.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Finalizing employment entitlements and stay of execution (04 August 2022)
This order marks the culmination of a protracted employment dispute, quantifying specific end-of-service entitlements while balancing the Claimant’s right to appeal against a significant penalty award.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Costs and interest allocation following employment and tort litigation (17 June 2022)
The litigation centered on a complex employment dispute involving allegations of embezzlement, dismissal with cause, and subsequent tort claims for abuse of process and malicious prosecution.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Conditional grant of permission to appeal tort claims (03 June 2022)
The litigation between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a protracted affair, involving multiple procedural stages. Following the Court’s judgment on 6 April 2022, which dismissed the Defendant’s counterclaims for malicious prosecution and abuse of process, the…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Retrospective extension for appeal notice filing (26 May 2022)
The dispute between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid has been a protracted matter involving multiple procedural milestones, as evidenced by previous orders such as [THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2018] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural consolidation and…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural sanctions for late submissions and improper reply content (25 May 2022)
The dispute concerns the post-judgment phase of the litigation between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid. Following the issuance of judgment on the primary claims and counterclaims, the Court established a strict schedule for the parties to file their respective submissions…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2022] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural extension for costs submissions (21 April 2022)
The dispute in CFI 029/2018 concerns the final stages of litigation between The Industrial Group, acting as Claimant and Counterclaim Defendant, and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid, the Defendant and Counterclaim Claimant.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2018] DIFC CFI 029 — Unlawful termination and malicious prosecution (06 April 2022)
The dispute centered on the summary termination of Mr. Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid, the former VP of Finance and Planning at The Industrial Group (TIG). TIG, a specialty chemicals and food flavors group, summarily dismissed Mr.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2021] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural management of closing submissions (15 September 2021)
The litigation involves a high-stakes commercial dispute between The Industrial Group Ltd, acting as Claimant and Counterclaim Defendant, and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid, the Defendant and Counterclaim Claimant.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2021] DIFC CFI 029 — Case Management Order (10 March 2021)
The litigation involves a multi-faceted dispute between The Industrial Group (the Claimant and Counterclaim Defendant) and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid (the Defendant and Counterclaimant).
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2020] DIFC CFI 029 — Strike out of the 'Meraab Claim' (02 November 2020)
The DIFC Court of First Instance reinforces strict adherence to pleading requirements by striking out a reformulated employment-related claim following the Claimant's failure to comply with previous judicial directions.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2020] DIFC CFI 029 — Strike out of the Meraab Claim (26 October 2020)
The DIFC Court of First Instance strikes out a reformulated employment claim, emphasizing the necessity of strict compliance with court-ordered pleading limitations and the requirement to prove actual loss in parent-subsidiary corporate structures.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2020] DIFC CFI 029 — Strike out of defective pleadings (27 May 2020)
Justice Sir Richard Field orders the strike out of a poorly drafted credit-related claim, mandating that future pleadings must be free-standing and devoid of improper document annexation.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2020] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural extension of time for amended pleadings (18 March 2020)
The litigation between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid involves a substantive dispute that necessitated the filing of an amended Counterclaim. The core of this procedural application centered on the Defendant/Counterclaimant’s request to adjust the deadlines previously…