LITT
Try LITT free
GRACIELA v GIACOBBE [2016] DIFC CFI 027 — Anonymisation of party identities in court records (16 November 2016)
The dispute in CFI 027/2014 involved an application by the Defendant, Giacobbe, to restrict the public disclosure of his identity in relation to the ongoing litigation against Graciela Limited.
GRACIELA v GIACOBBE [2015] DIFC CFI 027 — Damages and indemnity costs award (09 December 2015)
The dispute centered on a claim brought by Graciela Limited against the Defendant, Giacobbe, which culminated in a judgment delivered on 11 November 2015. Following the court's determination on the merits, the Claimant was awarded a specific sum in damages, which the court subsequently formalized…
GRACIELA v GIACOBBE [2015] DIFC CFI 027 — Indemnity costs for malicious IT sabotage (29 November 2015)
The dispute centered on the liability of the Defendant, Giacobbe, following the successful claim brought by Graciela Limited. Having established the Defendant’s liability in the underlying judgment, the Court moved to quantify the financial relief due to the Claimant.
GRACIELA v GIACOBBE [2015] DIFC CFI 027 — Procedural management of evidence (16 August 2015)
The dispute between Graciela Limited and Giacobbe involves a complex evidentiary phase where the Claimant, Graciela Limited, sought formal leave from the Court to expand the record. By filing Application Notice CFI-027-2014/9 on 9 July 2015, the Claimant requested permission to introduce reply…
GRACIELA v GIACOBBE [2015] DIFC CFI 027 — Document production and Redfern Schedule compliance (05 May 2015)
The litigation between Graciela Limited and the defendant, Giacobbe, reached a critical juncture regarding the scope of discovery. Both parties had filed competing requests for document production, leading to a stalemate that required judicial intervention.
GRACIELA v GIACOBBE [2015] DIFC CFI 027 — Procedural leave to substitute expert witness (26 April 2015)
The core of this procedural dispute involved the Defendant, Giacobbe, seeking formal judicial approval to replace their previously appointed expert witness. In the context of complex litigation under CFI 027/2014, the selection and retention of an expert witness are critical to the presentation of…
GABRIEL LIMITED v GIACOBBE [2015] DIFC CFI 027 — Procedural order for remote testimony (02 April 2015)
The litigation between Gabriel Limited and Giacobbe involves a civil claim currently before the Court of First Instance. As the matter progressed toward trial, the Defendant, Giacobbe, found it necessary to provide oral testimony despite being located in Australia.
GABRIEL LIMITED v GIACOBBE [2015] DIFC CFI 027 — Judicial refusal to adjourn Case Management Conference (12 February 2015)
The dispute in CFI 027/2014 involves Gabriel Limited as the Claimant and Giacobbe as the Defendant. The specific procedural conflict arose when the Defendant filed an Application Notice, identified as CFI 027-2014/5, on 12 February 2015.
GABRIEL LIMITED v GIACOBBE [2014] DIFC CFI 027 — Stay of enforcement pending set-aside application (16 November 2014)
This order clarifies the procedural interplay between enforcement applications and pending challenges to default judgments within the DIFC Court of First Instance.
GRACIELA v GIACOBBE [2014] DIFC CFI 027 — Default judgment and the rejection of a late defence extension (29 October 2014)
The dispute centered on the procedural timeline following the initiation of proceedings by the Claimant, Graciela Limited, against the Defendant, Giacobbe. The core of the matter involved the Claimant’s pursuit of a default judgment due to the Defendant’s failure to serve a defence within the…