LITT
Try LITT free
TAVIRA SECURITIES v RE POINT VENTURES [2017] DIFC CFI 026 — Jurisdiction of Licensed DIFC Establishments (17 December 2017)
The dispute centers on a breach of contract claim brought by Tavira Securities Limited ("Tavira"), an English-incorporated entity, against Re Point Ventures Fzco and three individual defendants.
TAVIRA SECURITIES v RE POINT VENTURES [2019] DIFC CFI 026 — Order of Discontinuance (13 March 2019)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formally concludes proceedings in CFI-026-2017 following a private settlement agreement between Tavira Securities Limited and the four named defendants.
TAVIRA SECURITIES v RE POINT VENTURES [2019] DIFC CFI 026 — Pre-Trial Review procedural directions (06 March 2019)
This order clarifies the procedural landscape of a complex financial services dispute, resolving contested amendments to statements of case, document production obligations, and the logistical requirements for international witness testimony.
TAVIRA SECURITIES v RE POINT VENTURES [2018] DIFC CFI 026 — Procedural resolution of Unless Order application (07 November 2018)
The litigation involved a dispute between the Claimant, Tavira Securities Limited, and four Respondents: Re Point Ventures FZCO, Jai Narain Gupta, Mayank Kumar, and Saroj Gupta. The core of the procedural friction centered on the Claimant’s Request for Further Information of the Defence, which was…
TAVIRA SECURITIES v RE POINT VENTURES [2018] DIFC CFI 026 — Procedural order for disclosure of further information (05 September 2018)
The litigation involves a dispute between Tavira Securities Limited and four defendants: Re Point Ventures FZCO, Jai Narain Gupta, Mayank Kumar, and Saroj Gupta. The core of the current procedural impasse centered on the Claimant’s need for additional clarity regarding the Defendants' position,…
TAVIRA SECURITIES v RE POINT VENTURES [2018] DIFC CFI 026 — Costs and pleading amendments following a failed jurisdiction challenge (29 January 2018)
Following the dismissal of a jurisdiction challenge, the DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the high threshold for indemnity costs and the evidentiary requirements for amending pleadings to include allegations of fraud and conspiracy.